Systems Thinking for Systems Making: Joining Systems of Thought and Action

Original Paper

Abstract

A common use of systems thinking (ST) is for guiding our practices of systems making (SM). One style of ST for SM centers on making designs with deterministic rules, as in the hard sciences, for guiding engineered applications. Another style mimics natural development, with a process by stepwise learning and improvisation to produce evolving designs; examples including architectural design, scientific research, and the practice of action research (AR). All these use exploratory pathfinding to search for better ways to work with reality, and this is the main subject of the paper. Both deterministic and adaptive ST for SM are widely found in differing roles, each having capabilities the other lacks. I start with simple models, such as step-wise improvisation for adapting recipes when making dinner. Another example is Robert Rosen’s model for how scientific and other cultures learn to work with nature, by turning attention back and forth between nature and theory for creating their cultural language. A review of the modern history of the systems sciences, as practices of ST for SM, then further broadens the view and context. That leads to introducing a new paradigm of natural systems thinking (NST), using commitments to critical awareness, emancipation, and methodological pluralism for working with natural systems.

Keywords

Systems thinking Systems making Rosen model Action research Natural systems thinking Pattern language Organizational change Narrative arcs 

References

  1. Aaker J, Schifrin D (2015) How stories drive growth: HSN. Stanford Business School, Marketing Management Case Study: Retrieved from https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/case-studies/how-stories-drive-growth-hsn. Accessed 2017
  2. Ackoff RL (1979) The future of operational research is past. J Oper Res Soc 30(2):93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander C (1965) A city is not a tree. Architectural Forum 122(1):58–62Google Scholar
  4. Alexander C (1979) The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M, Jacobson M, Fiksdahl-King I, Angel S (1977) A pattern language: towns buildings construction. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Argyris C (1957) Personality and organization. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Argyris C (1977) Double loop learning in organizations. Harv Bus Rev 55(115–117)Google Scholar
  8. Ashby WR (1952) Design for a brain. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baskerville R, Myers MD (2004) Special issue on action research in information systems: making IS research relevant to practice: foreword. MIS Q 28(3):329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baskerville RL, Wood-Harper AT (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J Inf Technol 11(3):235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press, New York, p 64Google Scholar
  13. Benyus JM (2002) Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Boulding KE (1956) General systems theory: the skeleton of science. Manag Sci 2(3):197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown GS (1953) Integration versus options in electrical engineering. Electr Eng 72(7):595–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell J (1968) The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press; Novato: New World LibraryGoogle Scholar
  17. Carr W, Kemmis S (2003) Becoming critical: education knowledge and action research. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  18. Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Checkland P (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice. Includes a 30-year retrospective. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Churchman CW (1979) The systems approach and its enemies. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., & Arnoff, E. L. (1957). Introduction to operations researchGoogle Scholar
  22. Cochocki A, Unbehauen R (1993) Neural networks for optimization and signal processing. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Conboy K, Fitzgerald B (2004) Toward a conceptual framework of agile methods: a study of agility in different disciplines. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on interdisciplinary software engineering research (pp. 37–44). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)Google Scholar
  24. Corey SM (1954) Action research in education. J Educ Res 47(5):375–380Google Scholar
  25. Feigenbaum MJ, Kadanoff LP, Shenker SJ (1982) Quasiperiodicity in dissipative systems: a renormalization group analysis. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 5(2):370–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feiler B (2013) The secrets of happy families [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/bruce_feiler_agile_programming_for_your_family. Accessed 2017
  27. Flood RL (2010) The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Syst Pract Action Res 23(4):269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flood RL, Jackson MC (eds) (1991) Critical systems thinking: directed readings. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Google Scholar (2017) Publication citation search. References to “adaptive systems thinking” filtered to exclude links for “complex adaptive systems”. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=-%22complex+adaptive+systems%22+%22adaptive+systems+thinking%22. Accessed 2017
  30. Google Ngrams (2017) Frequency of terms in scanned text. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/ngrams/. Accessed 2017
  31. Gell-Mann M (1994) Complex adaptive systems. In Cowan G, Pines D, Meltzer D (Eds.), Complexity: metaphors, models, and reality Proc. XIX: Addison-Wesley, pp 17–45Google Scholar
  32. Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The law of entropy and the economic process. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodwin BC (1994) How the leopard changed its spots: the evolution of complexity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  34. Grossberg S (1988) Nonlinear neural networks: principles, mechanisms, and architectures. Neural Netw 1(1):17–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2001) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Henshaw P (1978) Natural orders in convection. in a book of essays by the author, An unhidden pattern of events. Retrieved from http://www.synapse9.com/pub/1978_NatOrdersConv-Henshaw.pdf. Accessed 2017
  37. Henshaw P (1979) An unhidden pattern of events. Republished 2014 in H. Finidori (Ed.), An open source pattern language, “Patterns of complex natural systems”. Retrieved from http://debategraph.org/Details.aspx?nid=360233. Accessed 2017
  38. Henshaw P (1985) Directed opportunity, directed impetus: new tools for investigating autonomous causation. In Proceedings of Society for General Systems Research, Louisville KY. Retrieved from http://www.synapse9.com/pub/1985_DirOpp.pdf. Accessed 2017
  39. Henshaw P (2008) Life’s hidden resources for learning, cosmos & history. J Nat Soc Philos 4(1–2):371–386 Retrieved from http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/102/203. Accessed 2017
  40. Henshaw J (2010a) Complex systems theory. In McGinley M (ed) Encyclopedia of the earth. Retrieved from https://editors.eol.org/eoearth/wiki/Complex_systems. Accessed 2017
  41. Henshaw P (2010b) Models learning change. Cosmos and. History 6(1):122–141 Retrieved from http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/176/295. Accessed 2017
  42. Henshaw J (2013) 3-step process for working with nature. Retrieved from http://synapse9.com/signals/2013/07/03/3steps-process-for-working-with-nature/. Accessed 2017
  43. Henshaw J (2015) Guiding patterns of naturally occurring design: elements. In Proceedings of the PURPLSOC 2015 “pursuit of pattern languages for societal change,” July 3–5, 2015 Krems, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.synapse9.com/pub/2015_PURPLSOC-JLHfinalpub.pdf. Accessed 2017
  44. Henshaw P, King C, Zarnikau J (2011) System energy assessment (SEA): defining a standard measure of EROI for energy businesses as whole systems. Sustainability 3(10):1908–1943 Accessed from http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1908/. Accessed 2017
  45. Heron J, Reason P (2006) The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) The handbook of action research. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 144–154Google Scholar
  46. Hillside Group (1993 2017). Patterns library. Retrieved from http://www.hillside.net. Accessed 2017
  47. Holland JH (1992)"Complex adaptive systems." Daedalus, 121(1). (17–30), A New Era in ComputationGoogle Scholar
  48. Ison RL (2008) Systems-thinking and practice for action research. In: Reason PW, Bradbury H (eds) The Sage handbook of action research participative inquiry and practice, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London, pp 139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jackson M (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  50. Jacobs J (2000) The nature of economies. Vintage, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  51. Jevons WS (1885) The coal question: an inquiry concerning the progress of the nations. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Keynes JM (1964) The general theory of employment, interest, and money. First Harbinger Edition reprinting of 1935 original. (p. 161, Ch12-VII). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York. Retrieved from http://synapse9.com/ref/Keynes-ebook-TheGeneralTheory.pdf. Accessed 2017
  54. Köppe C, Inventado PS, Scupelli P, van Heesch U (2016) Towards extending online pattern repositories: Supporting the design pattern lifecycle. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, PLoP ‘16. Retrieved from http://www.hillside.net/plop/2016/papers/proceedings/papers/koppe.pdf. Accessed 2017
  55. Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. Univ. of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  56. Langton CG (1989) Artificial life. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Redwood CityGoogle Scholar
  57. Lewin K (1946) Action research and minority problems. J Soc Issues 2(4):34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lewin K (1947) Frontiers in group dynamics: concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Rrelat 1(1):5–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewin K (1958) Group decision and social change. In: Maccoby EE, Newcomb TM, Hartley EL (eds) Readings in social psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 197–211Google Scholar
  60. Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50(4):370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Maslow AH (1971) The farther reaches of human nature. Arkana/Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. McGregor DM (1960) The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. McKenon R (Ed.) (1941) The basic works of Aristotle. Book H, 1045:8–10Google Scholar
  65. Mead M, Sieben A, Straub J (1943) Coming of age in Samoa. Penguin books, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  66. Midgley G (1996) What is this thing called CST? In: Flood RL, Romm NRA (eds) Critical systems thinking. Springer, Boston, pp 11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Midgley G (2016) Four domains of complexity, 4 Emergence: Complexity and Organization: classic paper. Retrieved from https://journal.emergentpublications.com/article/four-domains-of-complexity-2/. Accessed 2017
  68. Nicolis G, Prigogine I (1977) Self-organization in non-equilibrium systems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Odum HT (1950) The biogeochemistry of strontium. (p. 6–8) in Yale University doctoral dissertation (Unpublished). Quoted in https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Howard_T._Odum.html#cite_note-12. Accessed 2017
  70. Odum HT (1983) Systems ecology: an introduction. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Pflaeging N (2014) Organize for complexity: how to get life back into work to build the high-performance organization. Betacodex Publishing. Available from https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/21807644-organize-for-complexity. Accessed 2017
  72. Pines D (2014) Emergence: A unifying theme for 21st century science. SFI Foundations & Frontiers of Complexity. Retrieved from https://medium.com/sfi-30-foundations-frontiers/emergence-a-unifying-theme-for-21st-century-science-4324ac0f951e. Accessed 2017
  73. Polimeni JM, Mayumi K, Giampietro M, Alcott B (2008) The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. Earthscan UK, SterlingGoogle Scholar
  74. Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2006) Handbook of action research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Riegner M (1993) Toward a holistic understanding of place: reading a landscape through its flora and fauna. In: Seamon D (ed) Dwelling, seeing and designing: toward a phenomenological ecology. State University of New York Press, Albany, p 181Google Scholar
  76. Rising L (1998) The patterns handbook—techniques, strategies and applications. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  77. Rosen R (1991) Essays on life itself. Columbia Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Russell S, Norvig P (1995) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  79. Schuler D (2008) Liberating voices: a pattern language for communication revolution. MIT Press, Cambridge Retrieved from http://publicsphereproject.org/patterns/LV. Accessed 2017
  80. Schwaber K (1997) Scrum development process. In: Business object design and implementation: OOPSLA'95 workshop proceedings. Springer, London, pp 117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schwaber K (2004) Agile project management with Scrum. Microsoft Press, Redmond Retrieved from http://www.homeworkmarket.com/sites/default/files/qx/14/12/16/12/jim_highsmith_agile_project_management_creatingbookzz.org_.pdf. Accessed 2017
  82. Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and science of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Senge PM (2006) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Senge P, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross R, Roth G, Smith B, Guman EC (1999) The dance of change: the challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations. Doubleday/Currency, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  86. Simon H (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106(6):467–482Google Scholar
  87. Simon HA, Newell A (1958) Heuristic problem solving: the next advance in operations research. Oper Res 6(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith TA (1957) Some engineering of the past and for the future. Journal of the SMPTE 66(11):696–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stephens J, Barton J, Haslett T (2009) Action research: Its history and relationship to the scientific method. In: Editor AA (ed) Systemic development: local solutions in a global environment. ISCE Publishing, Auckland, pp 721–729Google Scholar
  90. Stringer ET (2008) Action research in education. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  91. Tidwell J (1999) A pattern language for human-computer interface design. Retrieved from http://www.mit.edu/~jtidwell/common_ground.html. Accessed 2017
  92. Trist EL (1976) Action research and adaptive planning. In: Experimenting with organizational life. Springer, Boston, pp 223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Von Bertalanffy L (1968) General systems theory. George Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  94. Von Bertalanffy L, Rapoport A (1956). General systems. Yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General System Theory, 1 (pp. 1–10)Google Scholar
  95. Wahl DC (2017) Donella Meadows recommendations for how to dance with and intervene in systems. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@designforsustainability/donella-meadows-recommendations-for-how-to-dance-with-and-intervene-in-systems-92ace21743fb. Accessed 2017
  96. Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics. Hermann, ParisGoogle Scholar
  97. Wikipedia (2017a) Systems theory. In Wikipedia. Retrieved 2017, from, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_theory. Accessed 2017
  98. Wikipedia (2017b) Action research. In Wikipedia. Retrieved 2017, from, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research. Accessed 2017
  99. Wikipedia (2017c) Blind men and an elephant, citing Buddah’s Udana (68–69). In Wikipedia. Retrieved 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant. Accessed 2017
  100. Wilson RG, Pilgrim DH, Tashjian D (1986) The machine age in America, 1918–1941. Harry N. Abrams Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. Wolfram S (1984) Universality and complexity in cellular automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 10(1–2):1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HDS Natural Systems Design ScienceNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations