Advertisement

Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 377–393 | Cite as

Management of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment in Brazilian Public Education Institutions: Implementation Through Action Research on a University Campus

  • Cátia Emiliana Paes
  • Marcella Bernardo
  • Renato da Silva Lima
  • Fabiano Leal
Original Paper

Abstract

One of the problems facing public education institutions in Brazil is the question of the correct handling and treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Being that these institutions are part of the public sector, they should adhere to Decree no. 99,658/1990 for the disposal of their goods. However, this decree is not completely in accordance with the Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy (PNRS), especially when considering the regulations for disposal of public goods. Thus, these institutions have no WEEE management model which encompasses not only the Decree but also the PNRS. An example of this situation can be found at the Federal University of Itajubá (UNIFEI) in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Due to the lack of such a management model, the university warehouse is at full capacity and unable to receive additional electronic equipment. Therefore, the objective of this study is to create a management model for WEEE to be used at public education institutions using the guidelines set forth in both the Decree and the PNRS. An action research investigation was performed at UNIFEI which relied upon two improvement and learning cycles to deal with all the WEEE found at the university. The first was undertaken at the university warehouse and the second at other sectors within the institution. In addition to the practical results obtained by properly disposing of 474 WEEE products, this study showed that action research is an adequate management tool for public institutions looking to deal with problems of this nature, being that these institutions are almost always subject to bureaucratic controls with respect to their public property, and expected to follow rigorous legislation that is often times controversial.

Keywords

Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) Management of waste electrical and electronic equipment Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy (PNRS) Reverse logistics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank CAPES, CNPq and FAPEMIG, for their financial support given to the many projects that helped develop this study.

References

  1. Afroz R, Masud MM, Akhtar R, Duasa JB (2013) Survey and analysis of public knowledge, awareness and willingness to pay in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia—a case study on household WEEE management. J Clean Prod 52:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartunek JM, Louis MR (1996) Insider/outsider team research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  3. Chancerel P, Rotter S (2009) Recycling-oriented characterization of small waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Manag 29:2336–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chi X, Wang MYL, Reuter MA (2014) E-waste collection channels and household recycling behaviors in Taizhou of China. J Clean Prod 80:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coghlan D, Brannick D (2014) Doing action research in your own organization, 4th edn. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Coghlan D, Shani AB (2014) Creating Action research quality in organization development: rigorous, reflective and relevant. Syst Pract Action Res 27:523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coughlan P, Coghlan D (2002) Action research for operations management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22(2):220–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dwivedy M, Mittal RK (2012) An investigation into e-waste flows in India. J Clean Prod 37:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. García-Unanue J, Felipe JL, Gallardo L (2015) Using Action research to achieve the implementation of cost accounting: the case of the public sports organizations at local level. Syts Pract Action Res 28:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holgersson S, Melin U (2015) Pragmatic dilemmas in action research: doing action research with or without the approval of top management? Syst Pract Action Res 28:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huisman J, Magalini F, Kuehr R, Maurer C, Ogilvie S, Poll J, Delgado C, Artim E, Szlezak J, Stevels A (2008) Review of directive 2002/96 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). United Nations University, Bonn 2008Google Scholar
  12. Khetrival D, Krauchi P, Widmer R (2007) Producer responsibility for e-waste management: key issues for consideration—learning from the Swiss experience. J Environ Manag 90(1):1–13Google Scholar
  13. Kiddee P, Naibu R, Wong MH (2013) Electronic waste management approaches: an overview. Waste Manag 33:1237–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar V, Bee DJ, Shirodkar PS, Tumkor S, Bettig BP, Sutherland JW (2005). Towards sustainable product and material flow cycles: identifying barriers to achieving product multi-use and zero waste. In: Proceedings of international mechanical engineering congress and exposition—IMECE 2005, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim SR, Schoenung JM (2010) Toxicity potentials from waste cellular phones, and a waste management policy integrating consumer, corporate, and government responsibilities. Waste Manag 30:1653–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Y (2009) Implementing and evaluating performance measurement initiative in public leisure facilities: an action research project. Syst Pract Action Res 22:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mello CHP, Turrioni JB, Xavier AF, Campos DF (2012) Action research in production engineering: a structure proposal for its conduction. Produção. 22(1):1–13Google Scholar
  18. Menikpura SNM, Santo A, Hotta Y (2014) Assessing the climate co-benefits from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling in Japan. J Clean Prod 74:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nnorom IC, Osibanjo O (2008) Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:843–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orlins S, Guan D (2015) China’s toxic informal e-waste recycling: local approaches to a global environmental problem. J Clean Prod. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.090 Google Scholar
  21. Oteng-Ababio M (2012) When necessity begets ingenuity: e-waste scavenging as a livelihood strategy in Accra. Ghana Afr Stud Quart 13(1):1–21Google Scholar
  22. Presidência da República (1998) Decree no. 9,605, of February 12, 1998. Establishes sanctions applicable to crimes against the environment and provides other requirements. Casa Civil, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  23. Presidência da República (2010a) Law no. 12,305, of August 2, 2010. Establishes the National Policy for Solid Waste and provides other requirements. Casa Civil, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  24. Presidência da República (2010b) Decree no. 99,658, of October 30, 2010. Regulates within the federal public administration, the reuse, moving, alienation and other forms of disposal materials. Casa Civil, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  25. Qu Y, Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y, Zhong Y (2013) A review of developing an e-wastes collection system in Dalian. China J Clean Prod 52:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shani (Rami) AB, Pasmore WA (1985) Organization inquiry: Towards a new model of the action research process. In: Warrick DD (ed) Contemporary organization development: current thinking and applications. Scott Foresman, Glenview [Reproduced In: Coghlan D, Shani (Rami) AB (eds) (2010) Fundamentals of organization development, vol 1. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Souza RG, Rosenhead J, Salhofer SP, Valle RAB, Lins MPE (2015) Definition of sustainability impact categories based on stakeholder perspectives. J Clean Prod 105:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Susman GI, Evered RD (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Quart. 23(4):582–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tanskanen P (2013) Management and recycling of electronic waste. Acta Mater 61(3):1001–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Veit HM, Bernardes AM (eds) (2015) Electronic waste: generation and management. In: Electronic waste: recycling techniques. Springer, Porto Alegre, Brazil, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  31. Widmer R, Oswald-Krapf H, Sinha-Khetriwal D, Schnellmann M, BÖni H (2005) Global perspectives on e-waste. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25:436–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yin J, Gao Y, Xu H (2014) Survey and analysis of consumers’ behaviour of waste mobile phone recycling in China. J Clean Prod 65:517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeng X, Li J, Stevels ALN, Liu L (2013) Perspective of electronic waste management in China based on a legislation comparison between China and the EU. J Clean Prod 51:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeng X, Song Q, Li J, Yuan W, Duan H, Liu L (2015) Solving e-waste problem using an integrated mobile recycling plant. J Clean Prod 90:55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial Engineering and Management Institute (IEPG)Federal University of Itajuba (UNIFEI)ItajubaBrazil

Personalised recommendations