Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Operationalising “Double-Loop” Learning in Service Organisations: A Systems Approach for Creating Knowledge

Abstract

Learning organisation literature has widely discussed the connections between “double-loop” learning and its significance to organisational performance, but paying little attention to tools and systems that can operationalise “double-loop” learning in organisations. This paper investigates the impact of applying a systems approach for service operations design, expressed as the Vanguard Method (Seddon, Freedom from command and control: a better way to make the work work, 2003), in order to activate “double-loop” learning in service organisations. Two case studies were conducted in the banking mortgage operations and adults’ social care services in the UK, using the dimensions of the learning organisation questionnaire (DLOQ), semi-structured interviews, observations, and documents. The findings of the cross-case analysis support the link of applying the Vanguard Method with operationalising “double-loop” learning through three main factors, namely systematic-operations improvement, organisational capacity development, and outside-in mode of work; that are all embedded into the seven dimensions of the DLOQ. The value of this paper is the introduction of a service operations design tool that can activate “double-loop” learning performance in the fast changing knowledge era. It also provides an impetus for service organisations to creatively influence employees’ competencies to effectively improve internal systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Ackoff RL (1981) Creating the corporate future. Wiley, New York

  2. Argyris C (1977) Double loop learning in organizations. Harv Bus Rev 55(5):115–125

  3. Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  4. Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organizational learning II. Addison-Wesley, Reading

  5. Attride-Stirling J (2001) Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res 1(3):385–405

  6. Bagodi V, Mahanty B (2013) Double loop learning in the Indian two-wheeler service sector. Learn Organ 20(4/5):264–278

  7. Bhat AB, Verma N, Rangnekar S, Barua MK (2012) Leadership style and team processes as predictors of organisational learning. Team Perform Manag 18(7/8):347–369

  8. Blackman D, Connelly J, Henderson S (2004) Does double loop learning create reliable knowledge? Learn Organ 11(1):11–27

  9. Bryman A, Bell E (2007) Business research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  10. Capra F (1996) The web of life: a new scientific understanding of living systems. Double-day, New York

  11. Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, New York

  12. Cooper RD, Emroy CW (1995) Business research methods, 5th edn. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood

  13. Creswell JW (2004) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Columbus

  14. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334

  15. Dahanayake ND, Gamlath S (2013) Learning organization dimensions of the Sri Lanka army. Learn Organ 20(3):195–215

  16. Davies HTO, Nutley SM (2000) Developing learning organisations in the new NHS. Br Med J 320(7240):998–1001

  17. Deming WE (1982) Out of crisis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  18. Easterby-Smith M, Thorpe R, Lowe A (2002) Management research: an introduction, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London

  19. Garvin DA (1993) Building a learning organization. Harv Bus Rev 71(4):78–91

  20. Garvin DA, Edmondson AC, Gino F (2008) Is yours a learning organization? Harv Bus Rev 86(3):109–116

  21. Gregory AJ (2007) Target setting, lean systems and viable systems: a systems perspective on control and performance measurement. J Oper Res Soc 58(11):1503–1517

  22. Hannah ST, Lester PB (2009) A multilevel approach to building and leading learning organizations. Leadersh Q 20(1):34–48

  23. Hu Q, Found P, Williams S, Mason R (2012) The connections between organizational learning and lean production. In: Paper presented at the 23nd international conference of production and operations management, 20 April-23 April, Chicago, USA. http://www.pomsmeetings.org/ConfProceedings/025/FullPapers/FullPaper_files/025-0234.pdf. Accessed 26 Aug 2015

  24. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D (2005) Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annu Rev Psychol 56(1):517–543

  25. Jaaron A, Backhouse C (2012) The effects of lean thinking on service workers value productivity: a conceptual framework. Int J Qual Innov 2(1):1–17

  26. Jaaron A, Backhouse C (2014) Service organisations resilience through the application of the vanguard method of systems thinking: a case study approach. Int J Prod Res 52(7):2026–2041. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.847291

  27. Jackson MC, Johnston N, Seddon J (2008) Evaluating systems thinking in housing. J Oper Res Soc 59(2):186–197

  28. Khan S, VanWynsberghe R (2008) Cultivating the under-mined: cross-case analysis as knowledge mobilization. proceedings of the forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: qualitative social research 9(34). http://www.qualitativeresearch.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/334/729. Accessed 20 Jan 2016

  29. Lawler A, Sillitoe J (2013) Facilitating ‘organisational learning’ in a ‘learning institution. J High Educ Policy Manag 35(5):495–500

  30. Leech N (2009) A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant 43(2):265–275

  31. LePine JA (2003) Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality. J Appl Psychol 88(1):27–39

  32. Lundberg CC (1995) Learning in and by organizations three conceptual issues. Int J Organ Anal 3(1):10–23

  33. Maden C (2012) Transforming public organizations into learning organizations: a conceptual model. Public Organ Rev 12(1):71–84

  34. Meredith J (1998) Building operations management theory through case and field research. J Oper Manag 16(4):441–454

  35. Min-Huei Chien S (2004) A study to improve organizational performance: a view from SHRM. J Am Acad Bus 4(1/2):289–291

  36. Mohd-Zainal A, Goodyer J, Grigg N (2011) Learning organisation in Malaysian manufacturing companies. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international conference on quality and reliability (ICQR). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6031717. Accessed 16 Dec 2015

  37. Nevis EC, DiBella AJ, Gould JM (1995) Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Manag Rev 36(2):73–86

  38. Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, New York

  39. Ortenblad A (2004) The learning organization: towards an integrated model. Learn Organ 11(2):129–144

  40. Ortenblad A, Koris R (2014) Is the learning organization idea relevant to higher educational institutions? A literature review and a “multi-stakeholder contingency approach”. Int J Educ Manag 28(2):173–214

  41. Pedler M, Burgoyne J, Boydell P (1999) The learning company: a strategy for sustainable development. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead

  42. Pun KF, Nathai-Balkissoon M (2011) Integrating knowledge management into organisational learning. Learn Organ 18(3):203–223

  43. Putz D, Schilling J, Kluge A, Stangenberg C (2012) Measuring organisational learning from errors: development and validation of an integrated model and questionnaire. Manag Learn 44(5):511–536

  44. Rowley J (2006) What do we need to know about wisdom? Manag Decis 44(9):1246–1257

  45. Seddon J (2003) Freedom from command and control: a better way to make the work work. Vanguard Education, Buckingham

  46. Seddon J (2008) Systems thinking in the public sector. Triarchy Press, Axminster

  47. Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of learning organization. Century Business, London

  48. Shipton H, Zhou Q, Mooi E (2013) Is there a global model of learning organizations? An empirical, cross-nation study. Int J Hum Resour Manag 24(12):2278–2298

  49. Soltani E, Liao Y, Wang W (2011) A learning organisation approach to managing service quality. In: Proceedings of international joint conference on service sciences, Taipei, Taiwan. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5960272. Accessed 12 Dec 2015

  50. Synnott M (2013) Reflection and double loop learning the case of HS2. Teach Public Adm 31(1):124–134

  51. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (1998) Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications, London

  52. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R (1984) Introduction to qualitative research methods: the search for meaning. John Wiley, New York

  53. Tsai Y, Wu SW, Chung HJ (2010) How learning organisation influences staff members’ service quality. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM), Tokyo, Japan. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5530134. Accessed 20 No 2015

  54. Ursic D, Nikl A, Mulej M, Cester AS (2006) System-organisational aspect of a learning organisation in companies. Syst Pract Action Res 19(1):81–99

  55. Vogt WP (1999) Dictionary of statistics and methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oak

  56. Wang CL, Ahmed PK (2003) Organisational learning: a critical review. Learn Organ 10(1):8–17

  57. Watkins KE, Marsick VJ (1993) Sculpting the learning organization: lessons in the art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

  58. Watkins KE, Marsick VJ (1997) Dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Partners for the Learning Organization, Warwick

  59. Wen H (2014) The nature, characteristics and ten strategies of learning organization. Int J Educ Manag 28(3):289–298

  60. Yang B, Watkins KE, Marsick VJ (2004) The construct of the learning organization: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Hum Resour Dev Q 15(1):31–55

  61. Yin R (2009) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Ayham A. M. Jaaron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaaron, A.A.M., Backhouse, C.J. Operationalising “Double-Loop” Learning in Service Organisations: A Systems Approach for Creating Knowledge. Syst Pract Action Res 30, 317–337 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9397-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • “Double-loop” learning
  • Learning organisation
  • The Vanguard method
  • Systems thinking
  • Service operations
  • Operations management