Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Developing a Framework for a Viable Research University

  • 1276 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

A research university is a multi-mission organisation involved in education, research, and innovation that supports both the social development and economic well-being of the society. Therefore, good management of a research university is of strategic importance. However, to date, extant literature has centred on the functional aspects of research universities (namely education, research, and commercialisation), and less on the systems view of university operations. To fill this lacuna in the literature, this study proposes a general systems framework for a viable research university. The study first reviews literature on the functions and purposes of research universities. It then utilises the viable system model (VSM) as a modelling tool to develop a systemic framework for viable research universities. This proposed framework allows a comprehensive view of the functions of research universities thereby helping university management develop the necessary capabilities and allocate the appropriate resources toward achieving its mission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Achterbergh J, Vriens D (2002) Managing viable knowledge. Syst Res Behav Sci 19(3):223–241

  2. Adham KA (2008) Incubators within university and clustered contexts: cases of National Chiao Tung University (NCTU) and NTHU incubators in Hsinchu, Taiwan. Asian Acad Manag J 13(1):63–90

  3. Alpert D (1985) Performance and paralysis: the organisational context of the American research university. J High Educ 56(3):241–281

  4. Altbach PG (2007) Empires of knowledge and development. In: Altbach PG, Balán J (eds) World-class worldwide: transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. JHU Press, Maryland

  5. Altbach PG (2011) The research university. Econ Polit Wkly 46(16):65

  6. Altbach PG, Salmi J (eds) (2011) The road to academic excellence: the making of world-class research universities. World Bank Publications, Washington

  7. Ashby WR (1958) Requisite and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1:83–89

  8. Beer S (1981) Brain of the firm, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

  9. Beer S (1989) The viable system model: its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Operat Res Soc 35(1):7–25

  10. Brocklesby J, Cummings S (1996) Designing a viable organisation structure. Long Range Plan 29(1):49–57

  11. Checkoway B (1997) Reinventing the research university for public service. J Plan Lit 11(3):307–319

  12. Checkoway B (2001) Renewing the civic mission of the American Research University. J High Educ 72(2):125–147

  13. Clark W (2008) Academic charisma and the origins of the research university. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  14. Devine S (2005) The viable systems model applied to a national system of innovation to inform policy development. Syst Pract Action Res 18(5):491–517

  15. Dundar H, Lewis DR (1998) Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Res High Educ 39(6):607–631

  16. Eley A, Murray R (2009) How to be an effective supervisor: best practice in research student supervision. McGraw-Hill International, New York

  17. Espejo R, Gill A (1997) The viable system model as a framework for understanding organisations. http://moderntimesworkplace.com/good_reading/GRRespSelf/TheViableSystemModel.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2009

  18. Espejo R, Bowling D, Hoverstadt P (1999) The viable system model and the Viplan software. Kybernetes 28(6/7):661–678

  19. Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, Terra BRC (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res Policy 29(2):313–333

  20. Frost SH, Teodorescu D (2001) Teaching excellence: how faculty guided change at a research university. Rev High Educ 24(4):397–415

  21. Gascoigne J (2006) Book review. Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University 20(3):355–357

  22. Harwood SA (2009) The changing structural dynamics of the Scottish tourism industry examined using Stafford Beer’s VSM. Syst Pract Action Res 22(4):313–343

  23. Hoverstadt P (2008) The fractal organisation. Wiley, West Sussex

  24. Hoverstadt P (2010) The viable system model. In: Reynolds M, Holwell S (eds) Systems approaches to managing change: a practical guide. The Open University in association with Springer, London

  25. Jan TS, Chen HH (2005) Systems approaches for the industrial development of a developing country. Syst Pract Action Res 18(4):365–377

  26. Jones GA, Oleksiyenko A (2011) The internationalisation of Canadian university research: a global higher education matrix analysis of multi-level governance. High Educ 61(1):41–57

  27. Kawalek P, Wastell DG (2002) A case study evaluation of the use of the viable system model in information systems development. In: Grenbergen WV (ed) Information systems evaluation management. IRM Press, Hershey

  28. Khairul Akmaliah A, Hasmiah K, Mohd Fuaad S, Igel B (2012) Functions and inter-relationships of operating agencies in policy implementation from a viable system perspective. Syst Pract Action Res 25(2):149–170

  29. Kochukhov O (2006) Teaching versus research in academic career. http://www.uadm.uu.se/upi/arkiv/miniprojekt/proff_utv/Teaching.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2014

  30. Kuh GD (1996) Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. J Coll Stud Dev 37:135–148

  31. Leonard A (2000) The viable system model and knowledge management. Kybernetes 29(5/6):710–715

  32. Leonard A (2009) The viable system model and its applications to complex organisations. Syst Pract Action Res 22(4):223–233

  33. Lockwood G (1979) The role of registrar in today’s university. High Educ 8(3):299–320

  34. Mian SA (1996) Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Res Policy 25(3):325–335

  35. Mohd Fuaad S, Khairul Akmaliah A, Nur Atiqah A, Hänninen S, Walsh ST (2012) Incubators and government policy for developing it industry and region in emerging economies. Asian Acad Manag J 17(1) 65–96. [EBSCO; SCOPUS]

  36. Mohrman K, Ma W, Baker D (2008) The research university in transition: the emerging global model. High Educ Policy 21(1):5–27

  37. Mowery DC (1998) The changing structure of the US national innovation system: implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy. Res Policy 27(6):639–654

  38. O’Shea RP, Allen TJ, Morse KP, O’Gorman C, Roche F (2007) Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R D Manag 37(1):1–16

  39. Pusat Kecemerlangan Ilmu UKM (2009) http://202.185.40.70/old/downloads/Pusat%20Kecemerlangan/Garis%20panduan%20dan%20kriteria%20penubuhan%20pusat%20kecemerlangan.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2014 [in Malay]

  40. Rasmussen E, Moen Ø, Gulbrandsen M (2006) Initiatives to promote commercialisation of university knowledge. Technovation 26(4):518–533

  41. Rhoten D, Calhoun CJ (eds) (2011) Knowledge Matters: the public mission of the research university. Columbia University Press, Place

  42. Rogers EM, Yin J, Hoffmann J (2000) Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at US research universities. J Assoc Univ Technol Manag 12(1):47–80

  43. Schwaninger M (2006) Design for viable organisations: the diagnostic power of the viable system model. Kybernetes 35(7/8):955–966

  44. Serow RC (2000) Research and teaching at a research university. High Educ 40(4):449–463

  45. Shin JC (2009) Building world-class research university: the Brain Korea 21 project. High Educ 58(5):669–688

  46. Stahler GJ, Tash WR (1994) Centers and institutes in the research university: issues, problems, and prospects. J High Educ 65(5):540–554

  47. The Oxford and Cambridge Act (1877) Improving dispute resolution. http://www.staffs.ac.uk/idr/thepurposeofauniversity.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2014

  48. Walker J (2001) The Viable Systems Model: A guide for co-operatives and federations. http://www.esrad.org.uk/resources/vsmg_2.2/pdf/vsmg_2_2.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2014

  49. Watts M (2009) Collaborative implementation network structures: cultural tourism implementation in an English seaside context. Syst Pract Action Res 22(4):293–311

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by a UKM-PTS research Grant, Code No. PTS-2013-157. The authors wish to thank Siti Farah Dilla Zakaria, Norela Ahmad, Nur Sa’adah Muhamad, Siti Khadijah Mohd Ghanie, and Saida Farhanah Sarkam of UKM-Graduate School of Business, for their research assistance.

Author information

Correspondence to Khairul Akmaliah Adham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adham, K.A., Kasimin, H., Mat Isa, R. et al. Developing a Framework for a Viable Research University. Syst Pract Action Res 28, 503–525 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9341-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Research university
  • Viable system model
  • Systems thinking
  • Higher education