Advertisement

Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 575–591 | Cite as

An Analytical Framework of Social Learning Facilitated by Participatory Methods

  • Geeske ScholzEmail author
  • Art Dewulf
  • Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Original Paper

Abstract

Social learning among different stakeholders is often a goal in problem solving contexts such as environmental management. Participatory methods (e.g., group model-building and role playing games) are frequently assumed to stimulate social learning. Yet understanding if and why this assumption is justified is quite limited. Difficulties arise from the complexity and context-dependence of processes influencing social learning. Furthermore, continuing discussion of the exact meaning and theoretical basis of social learning result in a limited capacity to assess and evaluate whether social learning has occurred. In this paper we introduce an analytical framework to develop an in depth understanding of essential processes underlying social learning facilitated by participatory methods. Concepts from different fields of science are discussed and integrated, including resource management, small group research and learning research. The individual and group perspectives are brought together via mental models and emergent roles. We added the direction of learning, being either convergent or divergent, to be able to explore if and when personal views on a problem converge into a shared understanding of a problem. The analysis of convergence and divergence of learning is facilitated through the use of the mental model concept. Methods for measurement of proposed indicators for social learning are also discussed. The framework developed provides a conceptual basis for the analysis of social learning facilitated by participatory methods and an operationalization for application in empirical research.

Keywords

Social learning Resources management Mental model Role Participatory method Shared understanding 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thank Georg Holtz, Nadine Methner, Kathrin Knüppe and Johannes Halbe for critical comments and discussions.

References

  1. Akkerman S, Van den Bossche P, Admiraal W, Gijselaers W, Segers M, Simons RJ, Kirschner P (2007) Reconsidering group cognition: from conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio-cultural perspectives? Educ Res Rev 2(1):39–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooke B, Kothari U (eds) (2001) Participation: the new tyranny?. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Craik KJW (1943) The nature of explanation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24(3):522–537Google Scholar
  7. Dewulf A, Gray B, Putnam L, Lewicki R, Aarts N, Bouwen R, van Woerkum C (2009) Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: a meta-paradigmatic perspective. Hum Relat 62(2):155–193. doi: 10.1177/0018726708100356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eden C, Vangen S (1995) An analysis of shared meaning in collaboration. Paper presented at the second international workshop on multi-organisational partnerships: working together across organisational boundaries. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 1995Google Scholar
  9. Eden C, Ackermann F, Cropper S (1992) The analysis of cause maps. J Manag Stud 29(3):309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etienne M, Du Toit DR, Pollard S (2011) ARDI: a co-construction method for participatory modeling in natural resources management. Ecol Soc 16(1):44Google Scholar
  11. Flood RL, Romm NR (1996) Diversity management: triple loop learning. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert NG, Troitzsch K (1999) Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Haug C, Huitemaa D, Wenzler I (2011) Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78(6):968–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ison R, Roling N, Watson D (2007) Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environ Sci Policy 10(6):499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16(1):46Google Scholar
  18. Kesby M (2005) Retheorizing empowerment-through-participation as a performance in space: beyond tyranny to transformation. Signs 30(4):2037–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim H (2009) In search of a mental model-like concept for group-level modeling. Syst Dyn Rev 25:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolkman MJ (2005) Controversies in water management: frames and mental models. Dissertation, University of TwenteGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolkman MJ, Kok M, Van der Veen A (2005) Mental model mapping as a new tool to analyse the use of information in decision-making in integrated water management. Phys Chem Earth 30:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levine JM, Moreland RL (1990) Progress in small group research. Annu Rev Psychol 41:585–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lynam T, Brown K (2011) Mental models in human-environment interactions: theory, policy implications, and methodological explorations. Ecol Soc 17(3):24Google Scholar
  25. Lynam T, Mathevet R, Etienne M, Stone-Jovicich S, Leitch A, Jones N, Ross H, Du Toit D, Pollard S, Biggs H, Perez P (2012) Waypoints on a journey of discovery: mental models in human-environment interactions. Ecol Soc 17(3):23Google Scholar
  26. Mathevet R, Etienne M, Lynam T, Calvet C (2011) Water management in the Camargue Biosphere Reserve: insights from comparative mental models analysis. Ecol Soc 16(1):43Google Scholar
  27. Mohammed S, Klimoski R, Rentsch JR (2000) The measurement of team mental models: we have no shared schema. Organ Res Methods 3:123–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morine-Dershimer G (1992) Tracing conceptual change in preservice teachers. Teach Teach Educ 9(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newig J, Glaube V, Berkhoff K, Kaldrack K, Kastens B, Lutz J, Schlussmeier B, Adensam H, Haberl H, Pahl-Wostl C, Colard A, Aigner B, Maier R, Prunz W (2007) Partizipative Modellbildung, Akteurs- und Ökosystemanalyse in Agrarintensivregionen. Schlussbericht des deutsch-österreichischen Verbundprojekts. In: Matthies M (ed) Beiträge des Instituts für Umweltsystemforschung der Universität Osnabrück, OsnabrückGoogle Scholar
  30. Newig J, Haberl H, Pahl-Wostl C, Rothman DS (2008) Formalised and non-formalised methods in resource management—knowledge and social learning in participatory processes: an Introduction. Syst Pract Action Res 21:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newig J, Günther D, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecol Soc 15(4):24Google Scholar
  32. Norman DA (1983) Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner D, Stevens A (eds) Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 7–14Google Scholar
  33. Novak JD, Gowin DB (1984) Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostrom E (2009) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  35. Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pahl-Wostl C, Hare M (2004) Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 14:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tàbara D (2008a) The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science. Ecol Soc 13(1):24Google Scholar
  38. Pahl-Wostl C, Tàbara D, Bouwen R, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Ridder D (2008b) The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management. Ecol Econ 64(3):484–495. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pahl-Wostl C, Holtz G, Kastens B, Knieper C (2010) Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the management and transition framework. Environ Sci Policy 13(7):571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pahl-Wostl C, Becker G, Sendzimir J, Knieper C (in press) How multi-level societal learning processes facilitate transformative change: a comparative case study analysis on flood management. Ecol Soc Google Scholar
  41. Posner GJ, Strike KA, Hewson PW, Gertzog WA (1982) Accomodation of a scientific conception: towards a theory of conceptual change. Sci Educ 66(2):211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raadgever GT (2009) Does collaboration enhance learning? The challenge of learning from collaborative water management research. Dissertation, Technische Universiteit DelftGoogle Scholar
  43. Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141(10):2417–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reed MS, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Prell C, Raymond C, Stringer LC (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc 15(4):r1Google Scholar
  45. Richter D (2008) Teach and diagnose political knowledge: primary school students working with concept maps. Citizsh Teach Learn 5(1):60–71Google Scholar
  46. Romney AK, Weller SC, Batchelder WH (1986) Culture as consensus: a theory of culture and informant accuracy. Am Anthropol 88(2):313–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roschelle J (1992) Learning by collaborating: convergent conceptual change. J Learn Sci 2(3):235–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scholz G, Austermann M, Kaldrack K, Pahl-Wostl C (under review) A method to analyse social learning and evaluate group model building sessions by comparing individual mental models and group modelsGoogle Scholar
  49. Sendzimir J, Flachner Z, Pahl-Wostl C, Knieper C (2010) Stalled regime transition in the upper Tisza river basin: the dynamics of linked action situations. Environ Sci. Policy 13:604–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Senge PM (1997) The fifth discipline. Meas Bus Excel 1(3):46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Siebenhüner B (2004) Social learning and sustainability science: which role can stakeholder participation play? Int J Sustain Dev 7(2):146–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed MS (2006) Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecol Soc 11(2):39Google Scholar
  53. Van den Bossche P, Gijselaers WH, Segers M, Kirschner PA (2006) Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Res 37(5):490–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Mierlo B, Leeuwis C, Smits R, Klein Woolthuis R (2010) Learning towards system innovation: evaluating a systemic instrument. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77:318–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vennix J (1996) Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Systems ResearchUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Public Administration and Policy GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations