Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Social Efficacy by Responsible Change Management

  • 749 Accesses

  • 4 Citations


Social responsibility can be seen as a condition of efficient change management and even as a tool in crisis solving, mainly if associated with innovative social thinking and action. Change/Innovation management is the principal topic of the study, because it is seen as the main way to grow social effectiveness. New management fields are signaled; among them, crisis management and strategic management are accented and concisely presented. A system of effectiveness principles and its internal structure is described and explained. How to innovate is one of questions that our work tries to answer, because a well managed change offers the best formula, both fast and durable, of social problem solving. Can we, finally, design a science of socially responsible change, applied by change/innovation management? Crisis and lack or excess of effectiveness are strongly connected, as showed by our findings. Responsibility-ruled social effectiveness increasing is hence a central theme of the presented study. Economic and global effectiveness without abuse as aspects of social effectiveness are pointed out and a system of criteria for socially responsible social effectiveness evaluating and increasing is sketched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Baden-Fuller C, Volberda HW (1997) Strategic renewal in large complex organizations: a competence-based view. In: Heene A, Sanchez R (eds) Competence-based strategic management. Wiley, Chichester, pp 89–110

  2. Breton A (1982) Introduction to an economics of culture: a liberal approach. In: Kilbe DB (ed) Cultural industries: a challenge for the future of culture. UNESCO, Paris

  3. Deegan M, Tanner S (2002) Digital futures: strategies for the information age. Library Association Publishing, London

  4. EU (2011) Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions: A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, European Commission, Com (2011), 681 Final. Brussels, 25. 10. 2011

  5. Filip Fl Gh (2001) Towards an economy of culture and an information infrastructure. In: Filip Fl Gh (ed) Information society—knowledge society: concepts, solutions and strategies for Romania. Expert Publishing House, Bucharest, pp 144–147 (in Romanian)

  6. ISO (2010) ISO 26000; See: http://www.iso.org/iso/discovering_iso_26000.pdf. Accessed 15 Jun 2012

  7. James RK (2008) Crisis intervention strategies, 6th edn. Thomson, Brooks & Cole, Belmont

  8. Lipietz A (1989) Choisir l’audace. une alternative pour le XXI-e siècle. Éditions la Découverte, Paris

  9. Mulej M, Ženko Z, Potočan V, Hrast A (2012) ISO 26000 on social responsibility supports solving the global socio-economic crisis. In: Hofkirchner W (ed) Proceedings of the European meeting on cybernetic and systems research. The Ludwig von Bertalanffy Center, Vienna

  10. Owens I, Wilson T, Abell A (1996) Information and business performance:a study of information systems and services in high performing companies. Bowker-Sauer, London

  11. Pană L (2000) Philosophy of technological culture. Editura Tehnica, Bucharest

  12. Pană L (2004) Philosophy of information and information technology. Politehnica Press, Bucharest

  13. Pană L (ed) (2005a) Cultural models born under the influence of technological culture. Politehnica Press, Bucharest

  14. Pană L (2005b) Social and technological prognosis. Politehnica Press, Bucharest (in Romanian)

  15. Pană L (2006) Intellectics and inventics. Kybernetes: Int J Syst Cybern 35(7–8):1147–1164

  16. Pană L (2007) Human possible as conceptual and actional possile. Studies of universal philosophy, vol XV. Editura Academiei, Bucharest, pp 222–265

  17. Pană L (2008) Ethical principles of interaction and collaboration in virtual work teams constituted on the web, symposion K-Teams (National, with international participation), 2nd edition, Knowledge building virtual collaborative teams on the web (Coorganizer), October 30, 2008, Bucharest, Faculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, UPB

  18. Pană L (2009a) Communication and inter-personalization in virtual work groups constituted on the web. In: Balgiu BA, Constandache GC (eds) Communication—suggestion and influence: interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary aspects. Sigma Publishing House, Bucharest, pp 52–64

  19. Pană L (2009b) Social invention and change management. Noesis 34(1):41–52

  20. Pană L (2011) The cognitive and active status of principle in science and philosophy. Noesis 36(1):15–39

  21. Pană L (2012) Artificial ethics: a common way for human and artificial moral agents and an emergent technoethical field. Int J Technoethic 3(3):1–20

  22. Pearson CM, Clair JA (2008) Reframing crisis management. In: Boin RA (ed) Crisis management: an anthology, vol II. Sage, London, pp 1–24

  23. Potocan V, Mulej M (2009) Toward a holistical perception of the content of business ethics. Kybernetes 38(3):581–595

  24. Zaman Gh (2001) The digital economy. In: Filip Fl Gh (ed) Information society—knowledge society: concepts, solutions and strategies for Romania. Expert Publishing House, Bucharest, pp 405–414 (in Romanian)

  25. Ženko Z, Mulej M (2011) Diffusion of innovative behaviour with social responsibility. Kybernetes 40(9–10):1258–1272

  26. Zlate M (2004) Organizational efficacy. In: Zlate M (ed) Organizational and managerial psychology, vol I. Polirom, Iasi, pp 189–205 (in Romanian)

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Laura Pană.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pană, L. Social Efficacy by Responsible Change Management. Syst Pract Action Res 26, 579–588 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9305-9

Download citation


  • Crisis
  • Change/innovation management
  • Social effectiveness types and degrees
  • Effectiveness principles and criteria
  • Socially responsible change/innovation management