Towards a Dynamic Model of Organisational Flexibility
Organisational flexibility, as the ability to adapt quickly to new or changing environments, has received growing attention from both researchers and managers as a key driver for companies to survive and prosper in turbulent and unpredictable environments. Although many scholars have studied the complex nature and multidimensional structure of this construct, research on a comprehensive model, which explains the relationships between its key variables and consequent side effects of such iterations, remains a challenge. We explore these interactions and the dynamic adaptation processes applying system dynamics modelling to develop a more robust organisational flexibility theory. The objective of this paper is twofold, to provide dynamic propositions related to several strategies along different enterprise lifecycle stages and to complement the transition guidelines proposed by the organizational flexibility framework. The results suggest that decision concerning flexible capabilities management and organizational responsiveness can be improved if organizational flexibility is analysed and evaluated incorporating the time-varying dimension. The analysis help to test and expand current theory, envisage new theoretical propositions and provide new alternatives for empirical results about the complex construct of organizational flexibility.
KeywordsOrganizational flexibility System dynamics modelling Flexible capabilities Responsiveness Change strategies
A. Sopelana acknowledges financial support from a local funding project SAIOTEK-IMPEMA (2005) led by Ikerlan, S.Coop.
- Kanter RM (1988) When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In: Volberda HW (ed) Building the flexible firm: how to remain competitive. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 195Google Scholar
- Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1):145–179. In: Tan J, Zeng Y (2009) A stage-dependent model of resource utilization, strategic flexibility, and implications for performance over time: Empirical evidence from a transitional environment. Asia Pac J Manag (APJM) (2009) 26:563–588Google Scholar
- Sastry MA (1997) ‘Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change’. Adm Sci Q 42:237–275Google Scholar
- Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex World. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Suárez FF, Cusumano MA, Fine CH (2003) Flexibility and performance: a literature critique and strategic framework. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Volberda HW (1998) Building the flexible firm: how to remain competitive. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Volberda HW, Ende JCM, Van den, Ark HH, Rotmans J, Soete LLG, De Vries NK (2007) ‘What matters most for innovation? Multi-level complementarities between knowledge creation, transfer and utilization’. Proposal for NWO-MaGW strategic theme 2007–2010, p. 32Google Scholar