A Systems Theoretical Approach to Interoperability of Information

Original Paper

Abstract

A rapid process of hybridisation of man and technology, organisation and technology and society and technology is currently sweeping the world. This process requires a way of (scientific) thinking that takes hybrid systems as the starting point. Such an approach makes it increasingly important for hybrid systems to be interlinked, enabling them to exchange and share information through these links. This linking of (hybrid) systems to enable them to exchange and share information can also be denoted as the realisation of interoperability between (hybrid) systems. Five principles from Luhmann’s systems theory can help us understand interoperability. Interoperability enables (hybrid) systems to join random coalitions and networks. The network centric warfare concept is currently the basis for international efforts aimed at the development and application of interoperability that would enable armed forces to act effectively and efficiently. This paper demonstrates what we can learn from Luhmann’s system’s theory.

Keywords

Hybridisation Interoperability Systems theory Network centric thinking 

References

  1. Ackoff RL (1971) Towards a system of system concept. Manag Sci 17(11):661–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams TK (2001) Future warfare and the decline of human decision making. Parameters 2001–2002(Winter):57–71Google Scholar
  3. Alberts DS (2002) Information age transformation. CCRP, Washington, ISBN 1893723062Google Scholar
  4. Alberts DS, Garstka JJ, Stein FP (2000) Network centric warfare—developing and leveraging information superiority. CCRP, Washington, ISBN 1579060196Google Scholar
  5. Altmann J (2004) Military uses of nanotechnology: perspectives and concerns. Secur Dialogue 35:61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armitage J (2003) Militarized bodies: an introduction. Body Soc 9(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnall A, Parr D (2005) Moving the nanoscience and technology (NST) debate forwards: short-term impacts, long-term uncertainty and the social constitution. Technol Soc 27:23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arquilla J, Ronfeldt D (2000) Swarming and the future of conflict. Rand National Defense Research Institute, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  9. Atkinson SR, Moffat J (2005) The agile organization. From informal networks to complex effects and agility. CCRP Publication Series, Washington, ISBN 189372316xGoogle Scholar
  10. Baecker D (2001) Managing corporations in networks. Thesis Eleven 66:80–98Google Scholar
  11. Barnes B (2005) Elusive memories of technoscience. Perspect Sci 13(2):142–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baudrillard J (1994) Simulacra and simulations. University of Michigan, Michigan, ISBN 0472095218Google Scholar
  13. Blackmore T (2005) Dead slow: unmanned aerial vehicles loitering in battlespace. Bull Sci Technol Soc 25:195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Braidotti R (2006) Posthuman all too human: towards a new process ontology. Theory Cult Soc 23(7–8):197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carney D, Fisher D, Morris E, Place P (2005) Some current approaches to interoperability. Integration of software intensive systems initiative. Carnegie Mellon, SEI, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper R (2005) Peripheral vision: relationality. Org Stud 26(11):1989–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper R (2007) Organs of process: rethinking human organization. Org Stud 28(10):1547–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cronin B (2000) Strategic intelligence and networked business. J Inf Sci 26:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cronin B (2001) Information warfare: peering inside Pandora’s postmodern box. Libr Rev 50:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dillon M (2002) Network society, network-centric warfare and the state of emergency. Theory Cult Soc 19:71–79Google Scholar
  21. Frodeman R (2004) Nanotechnology: the visible and the invisible. Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
  22. Frodeman R, Klein JT, Carl M, Nancy T (2007) Interdisciplinary studies in science technology and society: new directions: science, humanities policy. Technol Soc 29:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gane N (2006a) Posthuman. Theory Cult Soc 23:431–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gane N (2006b) Simulation. Theory Cult Soc 23:282–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gane N (2006c) When we have never been human what is to be done? Interview with Donna Haraway. Theory Cult Soc 23(7–8):135–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray CH (2003) Posthuman soldiers in postmodern war. Body Soc 9(4):215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haraway DJ (1991) A cyborg manifesto science, technology, and socialist feminism in the late twentieth century. Routledge, New York, ISBN 0415903866Google Scholar
  28. Hayles KN (2006a) Traumas of code. Crit inq 33:136–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayles KN (2006b) Unfinished work: from cyborg to cognisphere. Theory Cult Soc 23(7–8):159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huber R, Langsaeter T, Eggenhofer P, Freire F, Grilo A, Grisogno AM, Martins J, Roemer J, Spaans M, Titze K (2008) The Indian Ocean tsunami: a case study investigation by NATO RTO SAS-065 part two: the case of Aceh and North Sumatra. CCRP-NATOGoogle Scholar
  31. IDABC (2004) European interoperability framework for pan-European eGovernment services. IDABC, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  32. Ihde D, Selinger E (2003) Chasing technoscience. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, ISBN 0253342538Google Scholar
  33. Joint Vision 2010 (1995) Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. DoDGoogle Scholar
  34. Joint Vision 2020 (2005) Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. DoDGoogle Scholar
  35. Kittler FA (1996) The History of Communication media. http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=45
  36. Kittler FA (1997) Literature, media, information systems. OPA Amsterdam, Amsterdam, ISBN 9057010615Google Scholar
  37. Kittler FA (2006) Thinking colours and/or machines. Theory Cult Soc 23(7–8):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kornberger M, Stewart C (2003) The architecture of complexity. Cult Org 9:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuhn ThS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. Chicago University Press, Chicago, ISBN 0226458083Google Scholar
  40. Latham A (2002) Warfare transformed: a Braudelian perspective on the ‘revolution in military affairs’. Eur J Int Relat 8:231–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Latour B (1988) How to write ‘the prince’ for machines as for machinations. In: Elliott B (ed) Technology and social process. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  42. Latour B (2002) Morality and technology: the end of means. Theory Cult Soc 19(5/6):247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Litvaitis A (2008) Challenges of implementation of the network centric warfare tenets in coalition environments. Baltic security & Defense review 10:143–170Google Scholar
  44. Luhmann N (1986) Autopoiesis: what is communication. Communication TheoryGoogle Scholar
  45. Luhmann N (1992) The concept of society. Thesis Elev 31:67–80Google Scholar
  46. Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, ISBN 0804726256Google Scholar
  47. Luhmann N (1996) On the scientific context of the concept of communication. Soc Sci Inf 35:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luhmann N (1997) The control of intransparency. Syst Res Behav Sci 15:359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luhmann N (2006) Systems as difference. Organization 13:37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McQuire S (2006) Technology. Theory Cult Soc 23(2–3):253–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ministry of Defence UK (2005) Network enabled capabilities, JSP 777 edn. 1, Jan 2005Google Scholar
  52. Ministry of Defence UK (2008) British defence doctrine. The Development Concepts and Doctrine Centre, WiltshireGoogle Scholar
  53. Mitchell PT (2006) Freedom and control networks in military environments. Working paper, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  54. Moffat J (2008) The response to hurricane Katrina. A case study of changing C2 maturity. NATO RTO SAS-065. CCRP-NATOGoogle Scholar
  55. NATO (2006a) NATO networked-enabled capability—vision and conceptGoogle Scholar
  56. NATO (2006b) Riga summit declarationGoogle Scholar
  57. Nolin PC (2006) Interoperability: the need for transatlantic harmonisation. NATO Parliamentary AssemblyGoogle Scholar
  58. Nolin PC (2007) Transforming the future of warfare: network-enabled capabilities and unmanned systems. NATO Parliamentary AssemblyGoogle Scholar
  59. Pels D, Hetherington K, Vandenberghe F (2002) The status of the object: performances, mediations and techniques. Theory Cult Soc 19(5/6):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Phister PW, Allen D, Barath J, Brandenberger U, Bruehlmann Burton A, Farell PhSE, Marien G (2008) Pakistan earthquake case study. NATO RTO SAS-065. CCRP-NATOGoogle Scholar
  61. Richter R, Huber K, Lechner U (2008) The Elbe flood 2002. A case study on C2 systems and inter-organizational coordination. NATO RTO SAS-065. CCRP-NATOGoogle Scholar
  62. Sheetz T, Vidal J, Pearson TD, Lozano K (2005). Nanotechnology: awareness and societal concerns. Technol Soc 27:329–345Google Scholar
  63. Singer PW (2009) Wired for war The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. The Penguin Press, New York, ISBN 9781594201981Google Scholar
  64. Smith EA (2006) Complexity, networking, and effects-based approaches to operations. CCRP, Washington, ISBN 1893723186Google Scholar
  65. Szepesy JE (2005) The strategic corporal and the emerging battlefield. The nexus between the USMC’s three block war concept and network centric warfare. The Fletcher School, CharlotteGoogle Scholar
  66. Thompson F, Roberts N (2006) "Netcentric" organization. Public administration review, July/August 2006, pp. 619–622Google Scholar
  67. Van Dyke Parunak H (2003) Making swarming happen. In: Conference of swarming and C4ISRGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Lier B (2009) Luhmann ontmoet ‘the Matrix’. Uitwisselen en delen van informatie in netcentrische omgevingen. Eburon, Delft, ISBN 9789059723085Google Scholar
  69. Varela R, Maturana HR, Urbie R (1974) Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems 5:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. von Bertalanffy L (1969) General system theory foundations development applications. George Braziller Inc, New York ISBN 9780807604533Google Scholar
  71. Wajcman J (2002) Addressing technological change: the challenge to social theory. Curr Soc 50:347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wajcman J (2006) New connections: social studies of science and technology and studies of work. Work Employ Soc 20:773–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage publications, Thoudsand Oakes, ISBN 0803971761Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CentricGoudaThe Netherlands
  2. 2.RSM Erasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations