Advertisement

Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 269–284 | Cite as

The Relationship of ‘Systems Thinking’ to Action Research

  • Robert Louis Flood
Original Paper

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship of systems thinking to action research by reviewing the main developments in systems thinking and relating these to action research. There are two main lines of thought in systems thinking that lead to wholly different conceptions about action research. The first (systems thinking) advocates thinking about real social systems that it assumes exist in the world. The second (systemic thinking) supposes only that the social construction of the world is systemic. Greater emphasis is placed on systemic thinking consistent with its greater importance to contemporary action research. The article concludes that systemic thinking when taken to its practical conclusion from a critical perspective offers to action research a somewhat unique liberating praxis. Concern that any liberating praxis could remain hollow is addressed through a certain kind of ‘spiritual’ awareness that is suggested by wholeness.

Keywords

Action research Systemic practice Holistic practice History of systems thinking Complexity theory Systemic spiritualism 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This article has been adapted from the original in Bradbury and Reason (2006) to make a positional article for Systemic Practice and Action Research. The section on the ‘socio-ecological perspective’ benefits from unpublished notes provided by and subsequent communications with John Barton and John Selsky. It also takes into account ideas that developed at a round table discussion held in July 1999 between myself, Merrelyn Emery and Eric Wolstenholme, a video of which is available from the Department of Management at Monash University, Australia.

References

  1. Ackoff RL (1974) Redesigning the future. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackoff RL (1981) Creating the corporate future. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organisational learning II. Addison Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Atthill C (1975) Decisions: west oil distribution. BP Educational Services, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Baburoglu O (1992) Tracking the development of the Emery-Trist systems paradigm. Syst Pract 5:263–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton J, Selsky J (1998). An open-systems perspective on urban ports: an exploratory comparative analysis. Working Paper 78/98, Monash University, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  7. Bateson G (1973) Steps to an ecology of mind. Granada, St AlbansGoogle Scholar
  8. Bateson G (1979) Mind and nature: a necessary unity. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Beer S (1979) Heart of the enterprise. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  10. Beer S (1981) Brain of the firm. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  11. Beer S (1985) Diagnosing the system for organisation. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell S (2008) Systemic approaches to managing across the gap in the public sector: results of an action research programme. Syst Pract Action Res 21:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berry T (1988) The dream of the earth. Sierra Club, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Burns D (2007) Systemic action research: a strategy for whole system change. Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  15. Checkland PB (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  16. Checkland PB (1985) From optimising to learning: a development of systems thinking for the 1990s. J Oper Res Soc 36:757–767Google Scholar
  17. Checkland PB, Holwell S (1998) Information, systems, and information systems. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Checkland PB, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Checkland PB, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  20. Churchman CW (1968) The systems approach. Delta, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Churchman CW (1979) The systems approach and its enemies. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Churchman CW (1982) Thought and wisdom. Intersystems, Seaside, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  23. Cilliers P (1998) Complexity and postmodernism: understanding complex systems. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Coghlan D, Brannick T (2010) Doing action research in your own organisation. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Coveney P, Highfield R (1995) Frontiers of complexity theory. Faber and Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Emery FE (ed) (1981) Systems thinking, (2 volumes). Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  27. Emery M (ed) (1989) Participative design for participative democracy. Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  28. Emery M, Purser R (1996) The search conference. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  29. Emery F, Trist E (1965) The causal texture of organisational environments. Hum Relat 18:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Flood RL (1999) Rethinking the fifth discipline: learning within the unknowable. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Flood RL, Jackson MC (eds) (1991a) Critical systems thinking: directed readings. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  32. Flood RL, Jackson MC (1991b) Creative problem solving: total systems intervention. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  33. Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  34. Forrester JW (1968) Principles of systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  35. Forrester JW (1969) Urban dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Forrester JW (1971) World dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenwood D, Levin M (1998) Introduction to action research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackson MC (1991) Systems methodology for the management sciences. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  40. Jackson MC (2009) Fifty years of systems thinking for managers. J Oper Res Soc 60:S24–S32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jenkins GM (1969) The systems approach. In: Beishon J, Peters G (eds) Systems behaviour. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) The balanced scorecard. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MassGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim DH (1993) Systems archetypes: diagnosing systemic issues and designing high leverage interventions. Pegasus Communications, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  44. Lewin K (1948) Resolving social conflicts. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. M’Pherson PK (1981) A framework for systems engineering design. Radio Electron Eng 51:59–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mason RO, Mitroff II (1981) Challenging strategic planning assumptions. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntyre A (2008) Participatory action research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Meadows DM et al (1972) Limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Mingers J, Gill T (1997) Multimethodology. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  50. Mitchell M (2009) Complexity: a guided tour. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Morgan G (1986) Images of organisation. Sage, Beverley HillsGoogle Scholar
  52. Page S (2010) Diversity in complex adaptive systems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  53. Pepper SC (1943) World hypotheses. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  54. Reason P (ed) (1994) Participation in human inquiry. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Reason P, Bradbury H (2006) Handbook of action research: Concise Paperback Edition. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Richardson GP (1991) Feedback thought in social science and systems theory. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  57. Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Senge P et al (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook. Nicholas Brealey, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Trist E, Bamforth KW (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Hum Relat 4:3–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Trist E, Emery F, Murray H (1997) The social engagement of social science—a Tavistock anthology. Vol. III: the socio-ecological perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  61. Ulrich W (1983) Critical heuristics of social planning. Haupt, BerneGoogle Scholar
  62. von Bertalanffy L (1950) The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science 11:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. von Bertalanffy L (1956) General system theory. Gen Syst 1:1–10Google Scholar
  64. von Bertalanffy L (1981) In: La Violette PA (ed) A systems view of man. Westview, Boulding, CAGoogle Scholar
  65. Waldrop MM (1992) Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. Viking, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolstenholme EF (1990) System enquiry: a system dynamics approach. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maastricht School of ManagementMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations