Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 173–200 | Cite as

How Lemmings on Wheels Can Make a U-Turn Through Social Inclusion and Democracy

Original Paper


The challenge is (a) to balance both centralised control to preserve the global commons and (b) to involve people in policy making so that they feel culturally engaged and committed to the policy. Dictatorships and forms of World government from above to support the global commons are no more of an answer than forms of liberal democracy that do not engage people in between national elections. Passive voting does not help people in diverse democracies to engage in thinking through ‘if then scenarios’ about their social, economic and environmental future.


Design Reframing Sustainability 



Denise de Vries has undertaken research with McIntyre funded by the Australian Research Council.


  1. Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bammer G (2005) Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialisation. Ecol Soc 10(2):6 (on line)Google Scholar
  3. Banathy B (1996) Designing social systems in a changing world. Plenum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Banathy B (2000) Guided evolution of society: a systems view. Kluwer/Plenum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck U (1992) Risk society towards a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck U (1998) Democracy without Enemies. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Beer S (1974) Designing freedom. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Beer S (1994) Beyond dispute: the invention of team syntegrity. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Caplan B (2007) The myth of the rational voter—why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts: putting the first last. ITDG, BathGoogle Scholar
  11. Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Christakis A, Bausch KC (2006) How people harness their collective wisdom and power. Information Age Publishing, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  13. Christakis A, Brahms S (2003) Boundary spanning dialogue for the 21st century agoras. Syst Res Behav Sci 20:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Churchman CW (1979) The systems approach and its enemies. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Churchman CW (1982) Thought and wisdom. Intersystems Publications, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  16. Crocker D (1995) Functioning and capability: the foundations of Sen’s and Nussbaum’s development ethic, part 2. In: Nussbaum M, Glover J (eds) Women, culture and development, a study of human capabilities. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Crossen T, Niessen V (2007) NGO standing in the European court of justice—Does the Aarhus regulation open the door? RECIEL 16(3):332–340Google Scholar
  18. De Vries D (2008) A tool for creating pathways. In: McIntyre-Mills J (ed) User centric policy design to address complex needs. Nova Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Dryzek JS (1990) Discursive democracy. Politics, policy and political science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Dryzek J (2000) Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Edgar D (2001) The patchwork nation: rethinking government-rebuilding community. Harper, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  22. Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks. Capstone, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Fishkin J (2000) The filter, the mirror and the mob: reflections on deliberative democracy. Paper presented at “Deliberating about Deliberative Democracy. February 4–6, University of Texas at Austin. accessed 20/03/2007
  24. Fishkin, Laslett (2003) Debating deliberative democracy. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flood R, Carson E (1998) Dealing with complexity: an introduction to the theory and application of systems science, 2nd edn. Plenum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Flood R, Romm N (1996) Diversity management: triple loop learning. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  27. Florini A (2003) The coming democracy: new rules for running a new world. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Fougere G (2007) ‘Wellbeing is an idea whose time has come.’ New opportunities for health impact assessment in New Zealand public policy and planning. The Public Health Advisory Committee. Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  29. Fukuyama F (2004) State building: governance and world order in the 21st century. Cornell University Press, New York, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  30. Fung A, Wright EO (2003) Deepening democracy. Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. The Real Utopias Project IV, Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Gore Al (2007) Assault on reason. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Gould C (2007) Transnational solidarities. J Soc Philos 38(1):148–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greenfield S (2000) The private life of the brain: emotions, consciousness and the secret of the self. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Habermas J, Derrida J, Borradori G (2003) Philosophy in a time of terror. Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida interviewed by Borradori, G. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Hassim A, Heywood M, Berger J (2007) Health and democracy. Siber Ink, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  36. Held D (2004) Global covenant: the social democratic alternative to the Washington consensus. Polity, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Held D, McGrew A, Goldblatt D, Perraton (1999) Global transformations. Politics economics and culture. Stanford University Press, Stanford CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  38. Held D et al (2005) Debating globalization. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones B (1990) Sleepers wake! Technology and the future of work, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  40. Kickert WJM, Klijn EH, Koppenjan J (1997) Managing complex networks. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Kjaer A (2004) Governance. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Koestler A (1967) The ghost in the machine. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Koestler A (1978) Janus: a summing up. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. McIntyre-Mills J (2000) Global citizenship and social movements: creating transcultural webs of meaning for the new millennium. Harwood Academic Publishers, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  45. McIntyre-Mills J et al. (2006a) Rescuing the enlightenment from itself: critical and systemic implications for democracy, vol 1. Springer, London, BostonGoogle Scholar
  46. McIntyre–Mills J (2006b) Molar and Molecular Identity and Politics. In: Van Gigch J, McIntyre-Mills J (eds) Wisdom, knowledge and management, vol 2. Springer, New York, Boston, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntyre-Mills J et al. (2006c) Systemic governance and accountability: working and reworking conceptual and spatial boundaries, vol 3 of C.West Churchman Series. Springer, London, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. McIntyre-Mills J (2007a) Challenging economic and religious fundamentalisms: implications for the state, the market and ‘the enemies within’. Int J Appl Syst Stud 1(1):49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McIntyre-Mills J (2007b) Systemic wellbeing based on user-centric design and experiential learning: making new meanings through identification of patterns. Proceedings of the 51st annual conference of the international society of the systems sciences: integrated systems sciences: systems thinking, modeling and practice, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan. August 5–10 ISBN 0 9740735712020Google Scholar
  50. McIntyre-Mills J (2007c) Ethics, boundaries and sustainable futures. Plenary Paper in the Proceedings of the 13th Australian and New Zealand systems sciences conference, systemic development: local solutions in a global environment. Auckland, New Zealand, 978-0791688-9-5Google Scholar
  51. McIntyre-Mills J (2008a) User-centric design to meet complex needs in citizenship in the 21st century. Nova Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. McIntyre-Mills J (2008b) Reconsidering relationships across self-others, the environment and technology. Syst Res Behav Sci 25(2):193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McIntyre-Mills J (2008c) New directions for social wellbeing through extending deliberative democracy to enhance representation. Paper presented at the Social Innovation Conference, Hawke Centre, Adelaide and a revised version presented in July International Systems Sciences Conference, Madison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  54. McIntyre-Mills J, Bausch K, Christakis A, De Vries D (2008a) ‘How can we break the mould?: democracy, semiotics and regional governance beyond the nation state’. Syst Res Behav Sci 25(2):305–322Google Scholar
  55. McIntyre-Mills J, De Vries D, Deakin J (2008b) Participatory democracy based on user-centric policy design to address complex needs. In: Kane L, Poweller M (eds) Citizenship in the 21st century. Nova Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Molinsky D (2008) ‘UN pulls no punches on ‘deeper downturn’.,,23710865-20142,00.html
  57. Nussbaum M (2006) Frontiers of justice, disability, nationality and species membership. Harvard University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: energy and environmental decision making. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Petkova E, Veit P (2000) Environmental accountability beyond the nation state. The implications of the Aarhus convention. Environmental governance note. World Resources Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  60. Pierre J (ed) (2000) Debating governance: authority, steering and democracy. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  61. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples with the idea of public reason revisited. Harvard University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Rhodes RAW (1997) Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  64. Rhodes RAW (2000) Governance and public administration. In: Pierre J (ed) Debating governance: authority, steering and democracy. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Rittel Horst WJ, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosenberg SW (2002) The not so common sense: differences in how people judge social and political life. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  67. Sen A (2000) Development as freedom. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. Sharpe L (2005) Creatures like us? A relational approach to the moral status of animals. Imprint, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  69. Singer P (2002) One world: the ethics of globalisation. The Text Publishers, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  70. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Tyson T (1989) Working with groups. Macmillan, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  73. Ulrich W (1983) Critical heuristics of social planning: a new approach to practical philosophy. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Van Gigch JP (1991) System design, modeling and metamodeling. Plenum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Van Gigch JP (2003) Metadecisions: rehabilitating epistemology, Kluwer Plenum, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  76. Vickers G (1968) Value systems and social process. Tavistock Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Vickers G (1983) Human systems are different. Harper and Row, LondonGoogle Scholar
  78. Warren E (1999) Democracy and trust. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.School of Computer Science, Engineering and MathematicsFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations