Advertisement

Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 197–210 | Cite as

Tease of the Perfect University: Mis/matching Systemic Elements and their Effect on Organisational Dynamics

  • Blane DesprésEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper discusses organisational dynamics in the context of the perceptions of faculty, staff and administrators in response to the Okanagan University College forced transition to the University of British Columbia Okanagan. Analysis employed a theoretical model entitled the Family of Related Systemic Elements (FoRSE) matrix that exposes the systemic properties of a problem (In the original presentation of the findings in this paper at the AERA, the matrix was entitled, “Systemic Factors Inventory Analysis matrix, or SyFIA.” The matrix continues to be refined, including changing its name and acronym.) The initial findings here suggest that in order for organisations to achieve a sustained higher level or degree of improvement they need to ensure greater accord between its systemic elements.

Keywords

Systemic thinking Organisational change Learning organisation Systemic analysis 

References

  1. Ackoff RL (1974) Redesigning the future. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Allio RJ (2003) Russell L. Ackoff, iconoclastic management authority, advocates a ‘‘systemic’’ approach to innovation. Strategy Leadership 31(3):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altbach PG (2004) The costs and benefits of world-class universities. Academe 90(1):20–23Google Scholar
  4. Anderson MS (2001) The complex relations between the academy and industry: views from the literature. J High Educ 72(2): 226–246 (Special Issue: The Social Role of Higher Education)Google Scholar
  5. Barnabè F (2004) From ivory towers to learning organizations: the role of system dynamics in the “managerialization” of academic institutions. Paper presented at the 22nd International conference of the system dynamics society, Keble College in the University of Oxford, Oxford, England, 25–29 July 2004Google Scholar
  6. Bleikle I (1999) The university, the state, and civil society. High Educ Eur 24(4):509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Checkland P (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice (includes a 30-year retrospective). John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale R, Robertson SL (2002) The varying effects of regional organizations as subjects of globalization of education. Compar Educ Rev 46(1):10–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Després B (2003) Systems in tension: perceptions of business and education in partnership. Unpublished dissertation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  10. Després B (2004) Systemic thinking and education leadership: some considerations. Int Electronic J Leadership Learn 8(7), University of Calgary Press, http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll/
  11. Després B (2005) Introduction to the SyFIA (Systemic Factors Inventory Analysis) matrix: a meta-analysis tool for understanding complexity. In: Paper presented at the American Education Research Association (AERA) annual meeting, Montréal, April 2005 (Special Interest Group: Systems Thinking in Education)Google Scholar
  12. Després B (2006) Toward a perfect university, part 1: corporate reality or Descartian dilemma? In: Round table presentation at the “education research in the public interest” American education research association annual meeting, San Francisco, California, 7–11 April 2006Google Scholar
  13. Després B (2007) Have We (un)covered everything? Re/connecting research through applied systemic thinking, contested qualities of educational research. In: Paper presented at the European education research association annual meeting, Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  14. Després B (ed) (2008) Systems thinkers in action: a field guide for effective change leadership in education. Rowman & Littlefield Education Leading Systemic School Improvement Series, Series Editor: Francis M. Duffy, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  15. Eaton M (2002) Searching for the “new university”: changing faculty roles. Working papers #2, Project on the Future of Higher Education, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  16. Flood RL (1999). Rethinking the fifth discipline: learing within the unknowable. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. John Wiley & Sons, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin I (2003) Adult education, lifelong learning and citizenship: some ifs and buts. Int J Lifelong Educ 22(6):566–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthews D (1998) Transforming higher education: implications for state higher education finance policy. Educom Rev 33(5):48–57Google Scholar
  20. Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitleton-Kelly E (2005) Designing a new organisation: a complexity approach. In; Paper presented at the European conference on research methods in business and management studies (ECRM), Paris, 21–22 April 2005Google Scholar
  22. Price I (2004) Complexity, complicatedness and complexity: a new science behind organizational intervention? E:CO Special Double Issue 6(1–2):40–48Google Scholar
  23. Sanders TI, McCabe JA (2003) The use of complexity science: a survey of federal departments and agencies, private foundations, universities, and independent education and research centers. Washington Center for Complexity & Public Policy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Watson D (2004) A new university world? National and international perspectives on changes in higher education. Green CollegeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of British Columbia OkanaganKelownaCanada

Personalised recommendations