Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 441–453 | Cite as

The Pattern-matching Role of Systems Thinking in Improving Research Trustworthiness

Original Paper


This paper seeks to identify a new and useful role for systems thinking in improving qualitative research quality. Firstly, it reflects upon the main characteristics and difficulties of qualitative research. Secondly, it critically reviews some of the techniques suggested to improve research credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability. Thirdly, it explains the concept of pattern-matching and its role in designing case studies. Based on these, the paper examines the pattern-matching role of systems thinking in enhancing the trustworthiness of qualitative research. Finally, a case study is described to illustrate how pattern-matching is embedded in systems perspective to improve research trustworthiness. The paper highlights that when systems thinking is combined with pattern-matching properly in qualitative research, it can help the investigators to develop a fuller and richer understanding of a phenomenon, and can enable others interested in the research to recover how conclusions have been made and to make informed judgement about the research findings.


Systems thinking Qualitative research Research trustworthiness Pattern-matching 


  1. Al-Busaidi K, Olfman L (2005) An investigation of the determinants of knowledge management systems success in omani organizations. J Global Inform Technol Manage 8(3):6–28Google Scholar
  2. Anderson V, Boocock G (2002) Small firms and internationalisation: learning to manage and managing to learn. Human Res Manage J 12(3):5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell D (1969) Reforms as experiments. Am Psychol (24):409–429Google Scholar
  4. Campbell D (1975) Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comp Polit Stud 8(2):178–193Google Scholar
  5. Cao G (2001) Systems thinking and managing organisational change. PhD Thesis, The University of LutonGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao G, Clarke S, Lehaney B (2004) The need for a systemic approach to change management—a case study. Syst Pract Act Res 17(2):103–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Act Res 11(1):9–21Google Scholar
  8. Chiles T, Meyer A, Hench T (2004) Organizational emergence: the origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theaters. Org Sci 15(5):499–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Churchman C (1971) The design of inquiring systems. Basic Books, New York Google Scholar
  10. Churchman C (1979) The systems approach and its enemies. Basic Books, New York Google Scholar
  11. Creswell JW (1994) Research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Decrop A (1999) Triangulation in qualitative tourism research. Tourism Manage 20:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterby-Smith M, Thorpe R, Lowe A (1991) Management research. Sage, London Google Scholar
  14. Flood RL (1995) Solving problem solving. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester Google Scholar
  15. Gregory W (1996) Strategies for underpinning critical systems thinking. In: Flood RL, Romm R (eds) Critical systems thinking—current research and practice. Plenum Press, pp 37–62Google Scholar
  16. Gummesson E (1991) Qualitative methods in management research. Sage, London Google Scholar
  17. Habermas J (1976) Communication and the evolution of society (English ed., 1979) Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Habermas J (1984a) The theory and communicative action, volume one: reason and the rationalisation of society. Polity Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  19. Habermas J (1984b) The theory and communicative action, volume two: the critique of functionalist reason. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Hefferman T, Farrell M (2005) The impact of culture on early international relationship development in the education sector. J Asia Pac Market 4(1):17–41Google Scholar
  21. Hyde K (2000) Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research. Qual Market Res 3(2):82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hussey J, Hussey R (1997) Business research. Macmillan, London Google Scholar
  23. Ke W, Wei K (2006) Understanding e-government project management: a positivist case study of Singapore. J Global Inform Technol Manage 9(2):45–62Google Scholar
  24. Kohn K. 2005) Idea generation in new product development through business environmental scanning: the case of XCar. Market Intell Plan 23(6/7):688–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manage 24(4):691–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee T, Mitchell T, Wise L, Fireman S (1996) An unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Acad Manage J 39(1):5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lincoln Y, Denzin N (1994) The fifth moment. In: Lincoln Y, Denzin N (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 575–586Google Scholar
  28. Lincoln Y, Guba G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, London Google Scholar
  29. Lo K, Lamm F (2005) Occupational stress in the hospitality industry—an employment relations perspective. N Z J Emp Rel 30(1):23–48Google Scholar
  30. Manz C, Bastien D, Hostager T (1991) Executive leadership during organizational change: a bi-cycle model. Human Resou Plan 14(4):275–288Google Scholar
  31. Mårtensson P, Lee A (2004) Dialogical action research at omega corporation. MIS Quarterly 28(3):507–537Google Scholar
  32. Midgley G (1992) Pluralism and the legitimation of systems science. Syst Pract 5:147–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage, London Google Scholar
  34. Ogden J (2006) Supply base reduction: an empirical study of critical success factors. J Suppl Chain Manage 42(4):29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paul D, McDaniel R (2004) A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quarterly 28(2):183–228Google Scholar
  36. Pauwels P, Matthyssens P (1999) A strategy process perspective on export withdraw. J Int Marketing 7(3):10–38Google Scholar
  37. Ross J, Staw B (1993) Organizational escalation and exit: lessons from the Shoreham nuclear power plant. Acad Manage J 36(4):701–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seale C (1999) The quality of qualitative research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas J, Gourley G, Mele N (2005) The availability of behavioral health services for youth in the juvenile justice system. Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 11(3):156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson F, Perry C (2004) Generalising results of an action research project in one work place to other situations: Principles and practice. Eur J Mark 38(3/4):401–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ulrich W (1983) Critical heuristics of social planning: a new approach to practical philosophy. Haupt, Berne Google Scholar
  42. Walsh K (2003) Qualitative research: advancing the science and practice of hospitality. Cornell Hotel Restaur Adm Q 44(2):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yin R (1984) Case study research: designs and methods. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  44. Yin R (1993) Applications of case study research. Sage, London Google Scholar
  45. Yin R (1994) Case study research: designs and methods. Sage, London Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business Organisation and Management, University of UlsterNewtownabbey, Co. AntrimNorthern Ireland, UK

Personalised recommendations