Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 461–473 | Cite as

Systemic View of Interorganisational Relationships: An Analysis of Business Networks

  • Flávia Angeli Ghisi
  • Dante Pinheiro Martinelli
Original Paper

Abstract

Business networks are formed by organisations with common interests. Inter-firm relations can bring to the companies involved an important contribution in the innovation processes: stimulating the division and sharing of scientific and technical information. This union between companies seems to be an appropriate alternative to promote the organisation's effectiveness. Considering the relevance of inter-organisation networks, their consolidation and the need to understand their essence as a mechanism of competitive advantage, this study is a theoretical reflection on the development of business networks and their proliferation. Using multiple perspectives, the paper discusses the classic authors, as well as contemporary references. It also analyzes the concept of networks and their importance, from a system's perspective.

The systemic analysis emphasizes a holistic interpretation, considers the environment, the interdependence of the parts and the business inter-organisation actions. More than a theory, the systemic view can be understood as a model of empirical analysis, used to better understand complex phenomena. Considering inter-organisational relations, the systemic approach consists of the mechanism to understand the dynamics of business networks, their interface, especially considering their role in gaining a competitive advantage. The results discussed in this paper can bring a rich understanding of the role of networks for companies that participate in this initiative.

Keywords

Business networks Interorganisational networks Systemic view 

References

  1. Amato JN (2000) Redes de cooperação produtiva e clusters regionais: oportunidades para as pequenas e médias empresas. Fundação Vanzolini. São Paulo, AtlasGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtsson M, Kock S (2003) Tension in Competition. Proceedings, Academy of Marketing Annual Conference, Washington,. Washington, May 28–31Google Scholar
  3. Borgatti SP, Foster PC (2003) The network paradigm in organisational research: a review and typology. J Manage 19:991–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borys SB, Jemison DB (1989) Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: theoretical issues in organisational combinations. Acad Manage Rev 14:234–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bridgewater S, Egan C (2002) International marketing relationships. New York, PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  6. Buono AF (1997) Enhancing strategic partnerships. J Organisational Change Manage 10:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cândido GA, Abreu AF (2000) Os conceitos de redes e as relações interorganisacionais: um estudo exploratório. Proceedings, 24° Encontro da ENAMPAD. Rio de Janeiro; ANPADGoogle Scholar
  8. Capra F (1999) A Teia da Vida, 4th edn. São Paulo, CultrixGoogle Scholar
  9. Casarotto NF, Pires LH (1999) Redes de pequenas e médias empresas e desenvolvimento local: estratégias para a conquista da competitividade global com base na experiência italiana. São Paulo, AltasGoogle Scholar
  10. Churchman CW (1971) The design of inquiring systems. Nova York, Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  11. da Silva RO (2001) Teorias da Administração. São Paulo, Pioneira Thomson LearningGoogle Scholar
  12. de Carvalho MC (2003) Um estudo sobre a situação atual e as negociações envolvidas nas redes de compras formadas por pequenos e médios supermercadistas brasileiros. Monografia. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Ciências Contábeis, Universidade de São PauloGoogle Scholar
  13. Debortoli G (2004) Inteligência competitiva e o contexto ambiental: uma Perspectiva Evolutiva da Teoria das Organisações. http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:Xrt3_v5kUEgJ:www2.uol.com.br/cultvox/novos_artigos/inteligencia_competitiva.pdf+Debortoli+sistemas+s%C3%A3o+identificados&hl= pt-BRGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferreira AA, Reis ACF, Pereira MI (1997) Gestão Empresarial: de Taylor aos nossos dias—evolução e tendências da moderna administração de empresas. São Paulo, PioneiraGoogle Scholar
  15. Fersterseifer JE (2003) Internacionalização e cooperação: dois imperativos para a empresa do terceiro milênio. NITEC E CEPAN/UFRGS. http:read.adm.ufrgs.br/read15/artigo/artigo4.pdfGoogle Scholar
  16. Gattorna JL, Walters DW (1999) Managing the supply chain in PELIÇÃO, TZ; NEVES, MF; Martinelli, DP, et al. Gestão de compra de produtos hortícolas por varejistas: análise de estratégias empresariais. Gestão & Produção 6(3)Google Scholar
  17. Ghisi FA (2005) Fatores críticos na sustentabilidade das centrais de negócios do setor supermercadista. Tese (Doctoral Dissertation), Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, USPGoogle Scholar
  18. Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strateg Manage J 19:293–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer AA (2000) Strategic networks. Strateg Manage J 21:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hakansson H, Ford D (2002) How should companies interact in business networks? J Bus Res 55:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanseclever L, Kupler D (2002) Economia industrial à fundamentos teóricos e práticas no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, CampusGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmlund M, Tornroos JA (1997) What are relationship in business networks? Manage Decis 35:304–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jarillo JC (1988) On strategic networks. Strateg Manage J 9:34–41Google Scholar
  24. Johnson RA, Kast FE, Rosenzweig JE (1967) The theory and management of systems. New York, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP (1997) A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad Manage J Rev 22:911–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lipnack J, Stamps J (1994) Rede de informações. São Paulo, Makron BooksGoogle Scholar
  27. Lira WL, Araújo GM, Gomes MLB (2004) Redes de empresas: uma experiência do consórcio de empresas de base tecnológica. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa (RECADM). vol 3, no. 2Google Scholar
  28. Martinelli DP (2002) Negociação Empresarial: Enfoque Sistêmico e Visão Estratégica. São Paulo, ManoleGoogle Scholar
  29. Maximiano ACA (2000) Teoria Geral da Administração: da escola científica à competitividade na economia globalizada, 2e edn. São Paulo, AtlasGoogle Scholar
  30. Miles RE, Snow CC (1986) Network Organisations: new concepts for new forms. Calif Manage Rev 28:62–73Google Scholar
  31. Miles RE, Snow CC (1992) Causes of failure in network organisations. Calif Manage Rev 34:53–72Google Scholar
  32. Mitchell JC (1969) The concept and use of social networks. In: Mitchell JC (ed) Social networks in urban situations. Manchester, University of Manchester PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Morvan Y (1991) Fondements d'economie Industrielle, 2e edn, Paris, EconomicaGoogle Scholar
  34. Nohria N, Eccles RG (1992) Networks and organisations: structure, form, and action. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Donnell A, Gilmore A, Cummins D, Carson D (2001) The network construct in entrepreneurship research: a review and critique. Manage Decis 39:749–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pelição TZ, Neves MF, Martinelli DP (1999) Gestão de compra de produtos hortícolas por varejistas: análise de estratégias empresariais. Gestão & Produção, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, vol. 6, no. 3Google Scholar
  37. Parkhe A (1991) Interfirm diversity, organisational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. J Int Bus Stud 22:579–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliances structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad Manage J 36:794–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter M (1998) Clusters and the new economics competition. Harvard Bus Rev 76:77–90Google Scholar
  40. Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organisation. Res Organisational Behav 12:295–336Google Scholar
  41. Rank KON, Wald AMA (2000) A Methodological Framework for the Analysis of Network Organisations. Proceedings, 26th Annual Conference of the European International Business Academy, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  42. Ribault JM, Martinet B, Lebidois D (1995) A gestão das tecnologias. Coleção gestão & inovação. Lisboa: Publicações Dom QuixoteGoogle Scholar
  43. Rits S (2005) Redes. http://www.rits.org.br/redes_teste/rd_oqredes.cfmGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodrigues C (2002) O concorrente é bom companheiro. Pequenas Empresas Grandes negócios. http://pegn.globo.com/edic/ed143/ges_companheiro.htmGoogle Scholar
  45. Santos SA, Pereira HJ, Abrahão Franca SE (1994) Cooperação entre as micro e pequenas empresas. São Paulo, SebraeGoogle Scholar
  46. Shaw WE (1999) Networks and their relevance to entrepreneurial/marketing interface: A review of the evidence. J Res Mark Entrepreneurship 1:24–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith S (1996) The Role of Trust in SME Business Network Relationships. Honours thesis, Queensland University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  48. Turnbull P, Ford D, Cunningham M (1996) Interaction, relationships and networks in business markets: an evolving perspective. J Bus Ind Mark 11:44–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vieira FMS (2003) Gerência da informática educativa: segundo um pensamento sistêmico. http://www.connect.com.br/∼ntemg7/gerinfo.htmGoogle Scholar
  50. Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organisation: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adm Sci Q 36:269–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yoshino MY, Rangan US (1996) Alianças estratégicas. São Paulo, MakronGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flávia Angeli Ghisi
    • 1
  • Dante Pinheiro Martinelli
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EconomyBusiness and Accounting in Ribeirão Preto (FEA-RP/USP), Rua IguapeRibeirão PretoBrazil
  2. 2.Faculdadede EconomiaAdministração e Contabilidade Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations