Systemic Practice and Action Research

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 519–530 | Cite as

Peirce and Beer

Article

Abstract

This paper considers the philosophical background of Stafford Beer's Viable Systems Diagnosis (VSD) as profoundly influenced by Charles Peirce. In a general sense, our work discusses the VSD theory base in the development of a model for actionable theory in organizations. This paper examines VSD theory in the Beer trilogy ‘Brain of the Firm,’ ‘The Heart of the Enterprise’ and ‘Diagnosing the System’ and we propose that a sound set of VSD action principles can be derived from this trilogy. We contend that the philosophical background underpinning these principles is important. Using Beer’s ‘Decision and Control,’ we consider that philosophical background and link Operational Research and the interdisciplinary learning within Cybernetics to modern general systems theory. We explore Beer’s viewpoint on the Peirce depiction of four main methods of fixing belief; tenacity, authority, a priori and finally the scientific to assist in that expansion. We consider how knowledge of Beer’s perspective on making sense of the world is important in the linkage of VSD theory to the managerial problem arena. We relate the Peirce methods to previously reported problem solving exercises involving the VSD ideology, which we will develop individually at a later date. This paper reflects our desire to express the interpretation of VSD theory in a language that the well-informed manager may readily translate into the third step of testing theory in practice.

Keywords

Operational Research Cybernetics Viable Systems Diagnosis (VSD) management action Practitioner/Scholar 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Ashby, R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Beer, S. (1959). Cybernetics and Management. Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Beer, S. (1966). Decision and Control, Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Beer, S. (1968). Management Science, Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Beer, S. (1971). Brain of the Firm, Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Beer, S. (1974). Designing Freedom, Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Beer, S. (1979). The Heart of the Enterprise, Wiley, UK. Reprinted with corrections 1988, 1994, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organizations, Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Beer, S. (2000). Ten pints of Beer. The rationale of Stafford Beer's cybernetic books (1959–1994). A discussion with Stafford Beer. Kybernetes: Int. J. Syst. Cybernetics 29(5/6) 99, 558–572.Google Scholar
  11. Britton, G. A., and McCallion, H. (1994). An Overview of the Singer/Churchman/Ackoff School of Thought. Syst. Pract. 7(5), 487–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Checkland, P. B. (1985). Achieving desirable and feasible change: An application of SSM, UK, J. Opl Res. 36(9), 821–831.Google Scholar
  13. Checkland, P. B., and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology, Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Churchman, C. W. (1968). Challenge to Reason, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  15. de Geus, A. (1997). The Living Company. Growth, Learning and Longevity in Business, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London.Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1939). Freedom and Culture, Putnam, NY.Google Scholar
  17. Emery, M., and Purser, R. (1996). The Search Conference, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Espejo, R., Schuhmann, W., Schwaninger, M., and Bilello, U. (1996). Organizational transformation and learning. In A Cybernetic Approach to Management, Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Flood, R. L. (1999). Rethinking the fifth discipline. In Learning Within the Unknowable, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  20. Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. (1995). Creative problem solving. In Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, UK.Google Scholar
  21. Haslett, T., Molineux, J., Olsen, J., Sarah, R., Stephens, J., Tepe, S., and Walker, B. (2002). Action research: Its role in the university/business relationship. Syst. Pract. Action Res. (SPAR) 15(6), 485–507.Google Scholar
  22. Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual, McBen, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How the Japanese Companies create the dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, NY.Google Scholar
  24. Richardson, G. P., and Pugh, A. L. (1981). Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  25. Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research. In Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  26. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation. Aust. Random House.Google Scholar
  27. Stacey, R. D. (1993). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics, Pitman Publishing, London.Google Scholar
  28. Stephens, J., and Haslett, T. (2001). Viable systems diagnosis and organizational learning. In Hutchinson W., and Warren M. (eds.), Published in proceedings: Systems in Management 7th Annual conference of the Australia and New Zealand Systems Society (ANZSYS), Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA.Google Scholar
  29. Stephens, J., and Haslett, T. (2002a). Viable Systems Diagnosis: An Adaptive Agent? In Published in proceedings: Sixth International Research Conference on Quality, Innovation and Knowledge Management. Kuala Lumpur, February 2002.Google Scholar
  30. Stephens, J., and Haslett, T. (2002b). Action learning as a mindset—The evolution of PICCO. Syst. Pract. Action Res. (SPAR) 15(6), 485–507.Google Scholar
  31. Stephens, J., and Haslett, T. (2004). From Cybernetics and VSD to management and action. In For publishing in proceedings: Fourth International Conference on Knowledge, Culture and Change in Organisations. University of Greenwich, London.Google Scholar
  32. Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 10(2–3), 291–330.Google Scholar
  33. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics. Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World, McGraw–Hill Higher Education, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Ulrich, W. (1988). Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research, Syst. Pract. 1, 137–163.Google Scholar
  36. Von Bertalanfy, L. (1968). General Systems Theory, Foundations, Developments and Application, George Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Weiner, N. (1948). Cybernetics, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Whyte, W. H. (1963). The Organisational Man, Penguin Books Ltd., Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Greyhound Racing VictoriaMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ManagementMonash UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations