Studies in East European Thought

, Volume 64, Issue 3–4, pp 183–204

Different concepts of personality: Nikolaj Berdjaev and Sergej Bulgakov

Article
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

The main concern of both Berdjaev’s and Bulgakov’s philosophical strivings consists in developing a concept of the person as the foundation of human dignity and creativity within a Christian worldview. Once attracted by Marxism with its emphasis on human dignity and social justice, they started to struggle against Marxism’s atheist materialism because of its lack of a concept of person. However, the same concern will lead both thinkers down very different paths with different consequences. This paper argues that, even though Berdjaev has become famous as a philosopher of the person and a herald of creative ethics, Bulgakov developed a more solid Christian justification of the same claims. Both systems are presented by means of comparing some crucial notions within their concepts of personality—potentiality, trinity and autonomy.

Keywords

Personality Autonomy Godmanhood Creativity Trinity Sergej Bulgakov Nikolaj Berdjaev Potentiality Sophiology Human Dignity Kant Feuerbach Solov’ëv Jacob Boehme Ungrund Meontology 

References

  1. Achutin, A. (1997). Sofija i čert (Kant pered licom russkoj religioznoj metafiziki). In A. Achutin (Ed.), Tjazhba o bytii (pp. 244–271). Moscow: Russkoe fenomenologičeskoe obščestvo.Google Scholar
  2. Alfeyev, H. (1999). Orthodox theology on the threshold of the twenty-first century. In: Kirchliches Aussenamt des Moskauer Patriarchats. http://orthodoxeurope.org. Cited 6 Aug 2012.
  3. Berdjaev, N. A. (2003). Dukh i real’nost’. Osnovy bogočelovečeskoj real’nosti. Moskva: Folio.Google Scholar
  4. Berdyaev, N. (1935). Freedom and the spirit (O. F. Clarke, Trans.). London: Geoffrey Bles, The Centenary Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berdyaev, N. (1944). Slavery and freedom (R. M. French, Trans.). London: Geoffrey Bles, The Centenary Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berdyaev, N. (1945). Destiny of man (N. Duddington, Trans.). London: Geoffrey Bles, The Centenary Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berdyaev, N. (1955). The meaning of the creative act (D. A. Lowrie, Trans.). London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Berdjaev, N. A., Bulgakov, S. N., & Šestov, L. I. (1961). Iz perepiski. Mosty, 8, 215–261.Google Scholar
  9. Berlin, I. (1992). The apotheosis of the romantic will. In I. Berlin (Ed.), The crooked timber of humanity (pp. 207–237). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  10. Bobrinskoy, B. (1986). Le mystère de la trinité. Cours de théologie orthodoxe. Paris: Les Editions du cerf.Google Scholar
  11. Brüning, A., & van der Zweerde, E. (Eds.) (2012). Orthodox christianity and human rights (=Eastern Christian Studies, vol. 13). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  12. Bulgakov, S. (1935): The Orthodox Church (E. S. Cram, Trans.). London: The Centenary Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bulgakov, S. (1936). Dokladnaja zapiska Mitropolitu Evlogiju Sergija Bulgakova po povodu opredělenija Archierejskago sobora v Karlovcach otnositel’no učenija o Sofii Premudrosti Božiej, Put’ (Priloženie).Google Scholar
  14. Bulgakov, S. (1979). Karl Marx as a religious type: his relation to the religion of anthropotheism of L. Feuerbach (L. Barna, Trans.). Belmont, MA: Nordland Publ.Google Scholar
  15. Bulgakov, S. N. (1987). Žizn’ za grobom. Paris: YMCA Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bulgakov, S. (1994). Heroism and asceticism. Reflections on the religious nature of the Russian intelligentsia. In M. S. Shatz & J. E. Zimmermann (Eds.), Vekhi: Landmarks: a collection of articles about the Russian intelligentsia (pp. 17–49). Armonk, London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  17. Bulgakov, S. (1995). Apocatastasis and transfiguration: Comprising his essay “On the question of the apocatastasis of the Fallen Spirits” of variable readings in Russian philosophy No 2 (B. Jakim, Trans.). New Haven: Variable Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bulgakov, S. (2000a). Philosophy of economy (C. Evtuhov, Trans.). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bulgakov, S. (2000b). The lamb of god (B. Jakim, Trans.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  20. Bulgakov, S. N. (2001). Glavy o trojčnosti. In S. N. Bulgakov, Trudy o trojčnosti (pp. 54–180). Moscow: OGI.Google Scholar
  21. Bulgakov, S. (2002). The bride of the lamb (B. Jakim, Trans.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  22. Dietrich, W. (2002). Nikolaj Berdjajew. Sein Denken im Prozess. Hamburg: LIT.Google Scholar
  23. Evlampiev, I. I. (2000). Istorija russkoj metafiziki v XIXXX vekach, Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: Aleteja.Google Scholar
  24. Evtuhov, C. (2000). Introduction. In S. Bulgakov, Philosophy of economy (pp. 1–32). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gajdenko, P. P. (1994). The problem of freedom in Nicolai Berdiaev’s existential philosophy. Studies in East European Thought, 46, 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gavrilyuk, P. L. (2005). The kenotic theology of Sergius Bulgakov. Scottish Journal of Theology, 58(3), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gavrilyuk, P. (2006). Universal salvation in the eschatology of Sergius Bulgakov. Journal of Theological Studies, 57(1), 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gercyk, E. K. (1991). Nikolaj Berdjaev. In N. Berdjaev (Ed.), Samopoznanie (pp. 254–371). Moscow: Kniga.Google Scholar
  29. Gippius, Z. (1999). Dnevniki. Moscow: NPK Intelvak.Google Scholar
  30. Haardt, A., & Plotnikov, N. (2008). Einleitung der Herausgeber. In A. Haardt & N. Plotnikov (Eds.), Diskurse der Personalität. Die Begriffsgeschichte der ‘Person’ aus deutscher und russischer Perspektive (pp. 17–22). München: Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Habermas, J. (1985). Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Zwölf Vorlesungen. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  32. Hallensleben, B. (2003). Sergej Bulgakov—Denker und Diener der göttlichen Weisheit. Novalis(sept/oct), 56–62.Google Scholar
  33. Idinopulos, T. A. (1969). Nicolas Berdyaev’s ontology of spirit. The Journal of Religion, 49(1), 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kozyrev, A. (2002). Čto daet sovremennomu soznaniju “Filosofija khozjajstva” otca Sergija Bulgakova? In J. Osipov (Ed.), Dva Bulgakova. Raznye sud’by Vol. I (pp. 59–69). Moscow: MGU.Google Scholar
  35. Litchfield, C. (2007). Ontologija i meontologija v kontekste ekzistencial’noj apofatiki Berdjaeva. In V. Porus (Ed.), N. A. Berdjaev i edinstvo evropejskogo dukha (pp. 83–89). Moscow: Biblejsko-Bogoslovskij Institut im. Sv. Andreja.Google Scholar
  36. Losskij, N. O. (1991). Istorija russkoj filosofii. Moscow: Sovetskij Pisatel.Google Scholar
  37. May, G. (1978). Schöpfung aus dem Nichts: die Entstehung der Lehre von der, creatio ex nihilo’ (Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte, 48). Berlin, NY: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McLachlan, J. M. (1992). The desire to be God. Freedom and the other in Sartre and Berdyaev. New York, Bern etc.: Lang.Google Scholar
  39. Meerson, M. (1996). Sergei Bulgakov’s philosophy of personality. In J. D. Kornblatt (Ed.), Russian religious thought (pp. 139–153). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  40. Meerson, M. (1998). The trinity of love in modern Russiant: The love paradigm and the retrieval of Western medieval love mysticism in modern Russian trinitarian thought (from Solov’ëv to Bulgakov). Quincy, IL: Franciscan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Okeanskaja, Ž. L., & Okeanskij, V. P. (2007). Filosofija tragedii N. A. Berdjaeva v kontekste „Tragedii filosofii“ o. Sergija Bulgakova. In V. Porus (Ed.), N. A. Berdjaev i edinstvo evropejskogo dukha (pp. 26–37). Moscow.Google Scholar
  42. Scaringi, P. A. (2007). Freedom and the “creative act” in the writings of Nikolai Berdiaev: An evaluation of Jürgen Moltmann’s theology of freedom. Dissertation, University of St. Andrews.Google Scholar
  43. Seiling, J. R. (2008). From antinomy to sophiology. Modern Russian religious consciousness and Sergei Bulgakov’s critical appropriation of German idealism. Dissertation, University of St. Michael’s College (Canada).Google Scholar
  44. Sergeev, M. (2006). Sophiology in Russian orthodoxy: Solov’ev, Bulgakov, Losskii, and Berdiaev. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  45. Slesinski, R. (2008). Bulgakov’s sophiological conception of creation. Orientalia Christiana Periodica, 2, 443–454.Google Scholar
  46. Stoeckl, K. (2008). Community after totalitarianism. The Russian Orthodox intellectual tradition and the philosophical discourse of political modernity. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Stoeckl, K. (2012). The human rights debate in the external relations of the Russian Orthodox Church. Religion, State and Society, 40(2), 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Struve, N. (Ed.). (2000). Bratstvo svjatoj Sofii: materialy i dokumenty 1923. Moscow, Paris: YMCA-Press.Google Scholar
  49. Todorov, T. (2006). L’esprit des Lumières. Paris: R. Laffont.Google Scholar
  50. Vaganova, N. A. (2010). Sofiologija protoiereja Sergija Bulgakov. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo PSTGU.Google Scholar
  51. Zwahlen, R. (2010). Das revolutionäre Ebenbild Gottes. Anthropologien der Menschenwürde bei Nikolaj A. Berdjaev und Sergej N. Bulgakov (Syneidos. Deutsch-russische Studien zur Philosophie und Ideengeschichte, 5). Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
  52. Zwahlen, R. (2011a). Der ökumenische Dialog über die Menschenrechte. Una Sancta, 1, 5–14.Google Scholar
  53. Zwahlen, R. (2011b). Moments of heaven on earth. Giorgio Agamben’s and Sergei Bulgakov’s conclusions from “economical theology,” unpublished paper presented at the conference Orthodox Christian Tradition and the Integration of Europe, Leuven, 15.–17.9.2011, organised by Institute of Eastern Christian Studies, Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Ökumenische Studien, Forschungsstelle Sergij BulgakovUniversität Freiburg SchweizFribourgSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations