Feminism, intellectuals and the formation of micro-publics in postcommunist Ukraine

Article

Abstract

This article broadens understanding of the role that East European intellectuals have played in building foundations for democratic institutions and practices over the past two decades. Drawing on Habermas’ writings on the public sphere, we use interviews conducted with founders of women’s and gender studies centers, professional women’s NGOs and Internet forums to examine the establishment of new micro-contexts for civic engagement and critical debate in Ukraine. Three main types of indigenous feminist micro-public are identified: academic, professional and virtual. Through an analysis of these micro-publics as well as the works of writer Oksana Zabuzhko, we explore the articulation and legitimation of a “national feminist” standpoint that draws upon feminism to criticize populist understandings of national history and civic belonging. We contribute to studies of democratization and transition by suggesting how small groups of critical intellectuals (locally called “tusovky”) acted as microfoundations of civil society. By supporting local engagement with Western critical theory, these small groups helped to create a new infrastructure for engaging intellectuals in the pluralization and diversification of public life.

Keywords

Public sphere Civil society NGOs Gender studies Women’s activism 

References

  1. Aheieva, V. (2003). Zhinochyi prostir: Feministychnyi dyskurs ukraïns’koho modernizmu. Kyiv: Fakt.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. R. O. G. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Author’s Interview with Larysa Kobelyanska, May 9. (2001).Google Scholar
  4. Authors’ Interview with Oksana Zabuzhko, June 26. (2008).Google Scholar
  5. Bhabha, H. K. (Ed.). (1990). Nation and narration. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Calhoun, C. J. (1992). Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 1–48). Cambridge, Mass: MIT.Google Scholar
  7. Chernetsky, V. (2007). Mapping postcommunist cultures: Russia and Ukraine in the context of globalization. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Filippova, O. (2007). Anti-orange discourses in Ukraine’s internet: Before the orange split. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23(1), 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. J. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, Mass: MIT.Google Scholar
  10. Gal, S., & Kligman, G. (2000). The politics of gender after socialism: A comparative-historical essay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass: MIT.Google Scholar
  12. Hroch, M. (1985). Social preconditions of national revival in Europe: A comparative analysis of the social composition of patriotic groups among the smaller European nations. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hryn, H. (2001). A conversation with Oksana Zabuzhko. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from http://www.bu.edu/agni/interviews/print/2001/zabuzhko-hryn.html.
  14. Hundorova, T. (1996). Franko–ne Kameniar. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.Google Scholar
  15. Kis’, O. (2003). Modeli konstruiuvannia gendernoi identychnosti v suchasnii Ukraïni. Yi, 27, 37–58.Google Scholar
  16. Kuts, S. (2001). Deepening the roots of civil society in Ukraine. Kyiv: Civicus.Google Scholar
  17. Kuts, S., & Palyvoda, L. (2006). Civil society in Ukraine: “Driving engine or spare wheel for change?” Kiev: Center for Philanthropy, Counterpart Creative Center and the CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation.Google Scholar
  18. Kyj, M. J. (2006). Internet use in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. Business Horizons, 49, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pavlychko, S. (1991). Chy potribna ukraïns’komu literaturoznavstvu feministychna shkola? Slovo i chas, 6, 10–15.Google Scholar
  20. Pavlychko, S. (1992). Between feminism and nationalism: New women’s groups in the Ukraine. In M. Buckley (Ed.), Perestroika and Soviet women (pp. 82–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pavlychko, S. (1997). Progress on hold: The conservative faces of women in Ukraine. In M. Buckley (Ed.), Post-Soviet women: From the Baltic to Central Asia (pp. 219–234). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pavlychko, S. (1999). Dyskurs modernizmu v ukraïns’kii literaturi. Kyiv: Lybid’.Google Scholar
  23. Pavlychko, S. (2000). Natsionalizm, seksual’nist’, oriientalizm: Skladnyi svit Ahatanhela Kryms’koho. Kyiv: Vyd-vo Solomii Pavlychko “Osnovy”.Google Scholar
  24. Pavlychko, S. (2002). Feminizm. Kyiv: Vyd-vo Solomii Pavlychko “Osnovy”.Google Scholar
  25. Pilkington, H. (1996). Farewell to the Tusovka: Masculinities and femininities on the Moscow youth scene. In H. Pilkington (Ed.), Gender, generation and identity in contemporary Russia (pp. 237–262). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Rosaldo, M. Z., Lamphere, L., & Bamberger, J. (Eds.). (1974). Woman, culture, and society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Shymchyshyn, M. (2005). Ideology and women’s studies programs in Ukraine. NWSA Journal, 17(3), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, A. D. (1987). The ethnic origins of nations. Oxford, UK and New York, NY, USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, A. D. (1991). National identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  30. State statistics committee of Ukraine. (2009). Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
  31. Stepanenko, V. (2005). How Ukrainians view their Orange Revolution: Public opinion and the national peculiarities of citizenry political activities. Demokratizatsiya, 13(4), 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Temkina, A., & Zdravomyslova, E. (2003). Gender studies in post-soviet society: Western frames and cultural differences. Studies in East European Thought, 55(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. United Nations Development Program. (2003). Gender issues in Ukraine: Challenges and opportunities. Kyiv: UNDP.Google Scholar
  34. Wachtel, A. (2006). Remaining relevant after communism: The role of the writer in eastern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Zabuzhko, O. (1993). Filosofiia ukraïns’koï ideï ta ievropeis’kyi kontekst: Frankivs’kyi period. Kyiv: Vyd-vo “Osnovy”.Google Scholar
  36. Zabuzhko, O. (1996). Pol’ovi doslidzhennia z ukraïns’koho seksu: Roman. Kyiv: “Zhoda”.Google Scholar
  37. Zabuzhko, O. (1997). Shevchenkiv mif Ukraïny: Sproba filosofs’koho analizu. Kyiv: Abrys.Google Scholar
  38. Zabuzhko, O. (1998). I, Milena. In J. K. Keefer & S. Pavlychko (Eds.), Two lands, new visions: Stories from Canada and Ukraine (pp. 125–161). Regina, SK: Coteau Books.Google Scholar
  39. Zabuzhko, O. (2001). Reportazh iz 2000-oho roku. Kyiv: Vyd-vo Fakt.Google Scholar
  40. Zabuzhko, O. (2002). Publicity and media under communism and after: The destruction of privacy. Social Research, 69(1), 35–47.Google Scholar
  41. Zabuzhko, O. (2005). Let my people go: 15 tekstiv pro ukraïns’ku revoliutsiiu. Kyiv: Vyd-vo “Fakt”.Google Scholar
  42. Zabuzhko, O. (2007). Notre Dame d’Ukraine: Ukraïnka v konflikti mifolohiï. Kyiv: Fakt.Google Scholar
  43. Zherebkina, I. (1999a). “Kto boitsia feminizma” v byvshem SSSR? In I. Zherebkina (Ed.), Femina Postsovietica: Ukrainskaia zhenshchina v perekhodnyi period: Ot sotsial’nykh dvizhenii k politike (pp. 11–82). Kharkiv: Kharkiv Gender Studies Center.Google Scholar
  44. Zherebkina, I. (Ed.). (1999b). Femina Postsovietica. Ukrainskaia zhenshchina v perekhodnyi period: Ot sotsial’nykh dvizhenii k politike. Kharkov: Kharkovskii tsentr gendernykh issledovanii.Google Scholar
  45. Zherebkina, I. (2002). Zhenskoe politicheskoe bessoznatel’noe (2 ed.). Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteia.Google Scholar
  46. Zherebkina, I. (2003). On the performativity of gender: Gender studies in post-Soviet higher education. Studies in East European Thought, 55(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhurzhenko, T. (2001). Ukrainian feminism(s): Between nationalist myth and anti-nationalist critique. International World Bank working paper, Vienna.Google Scholar
  48. Zhurzhenko, T. (2004). Strong woman, weak state: Family politics and nationbuilding in post-Soviet Ukraine. In K. R. Kuehnast & C. Nechemias (Eds.), Post-Soviet women encountering transition: Nation building, economic survival, and civic activism (pp. 23–43). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zhurzhenko, T. (2008). Gendernye rynki Ukrainy: Politicheskaia ekonomiia natsional’nogo stroitel’stva. Vilnius: European Humanities University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyReed CollegePortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Slavic Languages and LiteraturesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations