Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 143–167 | Cite as

The Downside of Being Up: A New Look at Group Relative Gratification and Traditional Prejudice

  • Josée LeBlanc
  • Ann M. BeatonEmail author
  • Iain Walker
Article

Abstract

In two experiments, we examine the moderating effect of the legitimacy and the stability of the advantaged in-group status on the relationship between measures of group relative gratification (GRG) and traditional prejudice among members of a structurally advantaged group. In Study 1, 133 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was based on legitimate or illegitimate grounds. As expected, when participants learned of the legitimate status of their in-group, GRG was associated with the endorsement of traditional prejudice. In Study 2, 188 participants learned that their advantaged in-group status was expected to remain stable or to fluctuate. As predicted, when participants were alerted to the decline in the privileged status of the in-group, GRG was positively associated with traditional prejudice. These findings illuminate the ways in which members of advantaged groups perpetuate intergroup inequities and point to a fuller, more nuanced conceptualization of system stability.

Keywords

Group relative gratification Prejudice Legitimacy Stability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a doctoral scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada conferred to the first author (767-2010-1721) and a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada conferred to the second author (950-203481). The authors thank Tanya Monger for her assistance with data collection.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Amodio, D. M., Devine, P. G., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2007). A dynamic model of guilt: Implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychological Science, 18, 524–530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Augoustinos, M., Ahrens, C., & Innes, J. M. (1994). Stereotypes and prejudice: The Australian experience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaton, A. M., & Deveau, M. (2005). Helping the less fortunate: A predictive model of collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1609–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beaton, A. M., Dovidio, J. F., & LeBlanc, J. (2011). Traditional prejudice and justice judgments: Does bias suppression moderate the relationship? Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 579–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettencourt, B. A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Schiffhauer, K. (2007). Racial attitudes in response to thoughts of White privilege. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, R. J. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham, E., & Platow, M. J. (2007). On helping lower status out-groups: The nature of the help and the stability of the intergroup status hierarchy. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 258–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., & Taylor, D. M. (2006). The counter-intuitive effect of relative gratification on intergroup attitudes: Ecological validity, moderators and mediators. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture (pp. 206–227). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dambrun, M., & Taylor, D. M. (2013). The counterintuitive association between life satisfaction and racism. SageOpen,. doi: 10.1177/2158244013505756.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de la Sablonnière, R., Taylor, D. M., Perozzo, C., & Sadykova, N. (2008). Reconceptualizing relative deprivation in the context of dramatic social change: The challenge confronting the people of Kyrgyzstan. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–52). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dubé, L., & Guimond, S. (1986). Relative deprivation and social protest: The personal-group issue. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 158–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Eibach, R. P., & Keegan, T. (2006). Free at last? Social dominance, loss aversion, and White and Black Americans’ differing assessments of racial progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 453–467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Grofman, B. N., & Muller, E. N. (1973). The strange case of relative gratification and potential for political violence: The V-curve hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 67, 514–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagendoorn, L. (1995). Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harth, N. S., Kessler, T., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Advantaged group’s emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: The dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 115–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Iyer, A., Leach, C., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leach, C. (2002). Democracy’s dilemma: Explaining racial inequality in egalitarian societies. Sociological Forum, 17, 681–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage: Explaining the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232–1245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). ‘Poisoning the conscience of the fortunate’: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development and integration (pp. 136–163). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Maritime Provinces Higher Education Commission. (2014). Annual report: Year in review 20132014. http://www.mphec.ca/media/83372/2013-2014_AR_EN_FINAL.pdf.
  28. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. McIntosh, P. (1989). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Working paper #189. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women.Google Scholar
  30. McIntosh, P. (2012). Reflections and future directions for privilege studies. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neuwenhuis, B. (2009). Relative deprivation and relative gratification as predictors of intergroup discrimination: Can prejudice be reduced by equality? Masters thesis. http://ufh.netd.ac.za/bitstream/10353/147/1/Masters%20Thesis%20Brigitte.pdf.
  33. Pedersen, A., Beven, J., Walker, I., & Griffiths, B. (2004). Attitudes toward Indigenous Australians: The role of empathy and guilt. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., Meertens, R. W., van Dick, R., & Zick, A. (2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Postmes, T., & Smith, L. G. E. (2009). Why do the privileged resort to oppression? A look at some intragroup factors. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 769–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powell, A. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2005). Inequality as ingroup privilege or outgroup disadvantage: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 508–521.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rogers, R. W., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1981). Deindividuation and anger-mediated interracial aggression: Unmasking regressive racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Scheepers, D. (2009). Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during inter-group competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 228–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2004). Social dominance theory: A new synthesis. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 315–332). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 203–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Snellman, A., & Ekehammar, B. (2005). Ethnic hierarchies, ethnic prejudice and social dominance orientation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tajfel, H. (1978). The psychological structure of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27–100). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tougas, F., & Veilleux, F. (1990). The response of men to affirmative action strategies for women: The study of a predictive model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Vers une méthodologie de validation trans-culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue française. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 30, 662–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker, I. (1994). Attitudes to minorities: Survey evidence of Western Australians’ attitudes to Aborigines, Asians, and Women. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (2002). Fifty years of relative deprivation research. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 1–9). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Walker, I., Wong, N. K., & Kretzschmar, K. (2002). Relative deprivation and attribution: From grievance to action. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 288–312). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Whol, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversité de MonctonMonctonCanada
  2. 2.Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations