Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 1–6 | Cite as

Advances in Relative Deprivation Theory and Research

  • Heather J. SmithEmail author
  • Thomas F. Pettigrew
Article

Abstract

The focus of this special issue is relative deprivation (RD): the judgment that one or one’s group is worse off compared to some standard accompanied by feelings of anger and resentment. This collection of seven papers demonstrates the range of the new thinking and research about RD, and they include data from an impressive variety of participants—including Canadians (both French- and English-speakers), Dutch, the Maoris of New Zealand, Mongols, Singaporeans, and South Africans (both Blacks and Whites). These seven papers show that if RD, and its counterpart, relative gratification, are defined carefully, at the right level of analysis and employed within larger theoretical models, the concept offers invaluable insight to how people respond to often dramatic changes in their objective circumstances.

Keywords

Relative deprivation Relative gratification Collective action Prejudice Deservingness Resentment Comparison 

References

  1. Albert, S. (1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84, 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Brush, S. G. (1996). Dynamics of theory change in the social sciences: Relative deprivation and collective violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40, 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. C. (2000). Personality and emotional correlates of right- wing authoritarianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duckitt, J. H. (1992). Psychology and prejudice: A historical analysis and integrative framework. American Psychologist, 47(10), 1182–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice? Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18(6), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finkel, S., & Rule, J. (1987). Relative deprivation and related psychological theories of civil violence: A critical review. Research in Social Movements: Conflicts and Change, 9, 47–69.Google Scholar
  9. Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurney, J., & Tierney, K. (1982). Relative deprivation and social movements: A critical look at twenty years of theory and research. The Sociological Quarterly, 23, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hartley, E. L. (1946). Problems in prejudice. New York: Kings Crown Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pettigrew, T. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects generalize to non-contacted outgroups? Social Psychology, 40(2), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pettigrew, T. F. (2015) Stouffer and relative deprivation. Social Psychology Quarterly (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Meertens, R. W., Wagner, U., van Dick, R., & Zick, A. (2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  17. Sibley, C., & Duckitt, J. (2000). Personality and prejudice: A meta- analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, H., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic critique. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sonoma State UniversityRohnert ParkUSA
  2. 2.University of California, Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations