Social Justice Research

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 336–351 | Cite as

Fairness in Animals: Where to from Here?

Article

Abstract

In the last decade, there has been an explosion of work investigating non-human species’ behavior as it relates to the human sense of fairness and justice. This research has provided a much needed evolutionary perspective on humans, and highlighted ways in which humans’ behavior is both similar to and different from that of other species. In this concluding paper, we outline the major threads of the work highlighted in this and the previous special issues of Social Justice Research and provide thoughts on future directions for the field. This is a very exciting time in our exploration of the evolution of human justice and fairness, and we eagerly await the developments of the next decade.

Keywords

Inequity Fairness Justice Evolution of behavior Comparative approach 

References

  1. Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012). Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e39211. doi:10.1371/journal/pone.0039211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekoff, M. (2004). Wild justice, cooperation, and fair play: Minding manners, being nice, and feeling good. In R. Sussman & A. Chapman (Eds.), The origins and nature of sociality (pp. 53–79). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, P. R., & McAuliffe, K. (2011). “I had so much it didn’t seem fair”: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120, 215–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Are apes really inequity averse? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 273, 3123–3128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bräuer, J., & Hanus, D. (2012). Fairness in non-human primates? Social Justice Research, 25(3). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0159-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brosnan, S. F. (2006a). At a crossroads of disciplines. Social Justice Research, 19, 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brosnan, S. F. (2006b). Nonhuman species’ reactions to inequity and their implications for fairness. Social Justice Research, 19, 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brosnan, S. F. (2011a). An evolutionary perspective on morality. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77, 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brosnan, S. F. (2011b). A hypothesis of the co-evolution of inequity and cooperation. Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, 5, 43. doi:10.3398/fnins.2011.00043.Google Scholar
  10. Brosnan, S. F. (2012). Introduction to “Justice in Animals”. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brosnan, S. F., Freeman, C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2006). Partner’s behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 68, 713–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brosnan, S. F., Houser, D., Leimgruber, K., Xiao, E., Chen, T., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2010). Competing demands of prosociality and equity in monkeys. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31(4), 279–288. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brosnan, S. F., Jones, O. D., Gardner, M., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. J. (2012). Evolution and the expression of biases: Situational value changes the endowment effect in chimpanzees. Evolution & Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.11.009.Google Scholar
  15. Brosnan, S. F., Newton-Fisher, N. E., & van Vugt, M. (2009). A melding of the minds: When primatology meets social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(2), 129–147. doi:10.1177/1088868309335127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brosnan, S. F., Schiff, H. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 1560, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brosnan, S. F., Talbot, C., Ahlgren, M., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. J. (2010). Mechanisms underlying the response to inequity in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behavior, 79, 1229–1237. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bshary, R., Grutter, A. S., Willener, A. S. T., & Leimar, O. (2008). Pairs of cooperating cleaner fish provide better service quality than singletons. Nature, 455, 964–967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burkart, J., Fehr, E., Efferson, C., & van Schaik, C. P. (2007). Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: Common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 19762–19766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, J., & Houser, D. (2012). Non-human primate studies inform the foundations of fair and just human institutions. Social Justice Research, 25(3). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0162-y.
  21. Chen, M. K., & Santos, L. R. (2006). Some thoughts on the adaptive function of inequity aversion: An alternative to Brosnan’s social hypothesis. Social Justice Research, 19(2), 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Christen, M., & Glock, H.-J. (2012). The (limited) space for justice in social animals. Social Justice Research, 25(3). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0163-x.
  23. Cronin, K. A., Schroeder, K. K. E., Rothwell, E. S., Silk, J. B., & Snowdon, C. (2009). Cooperatively breeding cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) do not donate rewards to their long-term mates. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 231–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cronin, K. A., Schroeder, K. K. E., & Snowdon, C. (2010). Prosocial behaviour emerges independent of reciprocity in cottontop tamarins. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3845–3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dana, J. D., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, J. (2003). Exploiting moral wriggle room: Behavior inconsistent with a preference for fair outcomes. Carnegie mellon behavioral decision research working paper no. 349. http://ssrn.com/abstract=400900. Accessed 15 July 2012.
  26. de Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. de Waal, F. B. M. (1991). The chimpanzee’s sense of social regularity and its relation to the human sense of justice. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(3), 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. de Waal, F. B. M., & Berger, M. L. (2000). Payment for labour in monkeys. Nature, 404, 563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. de Waal, F. B. M., & Davis, J. M. (2002). Capuchin cognitive ecology: Cooperation based on projected returns. Neuropsychologia, 1492, 1–8.Google Scholar
  30. de Waal, F. B. M., Leimgruber, K., & Greenberg, A. (2008). Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 13685–13689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dindo, M., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2006). Partner effects on food consumption in brown capuchin monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 69, 1–6.Google Scholar
  32. Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454, 1079–1083.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fontenot, M. B., Watson, S. L., Roberts, K. A., & Miller, R. W. (2007). Effects of food preferences on token exchange and behavioural responses to inequality in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behavior, 74, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  37. Frank, R. H. (2001). Cooperation through emotional commitment. In R. M. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 57–76). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Freeman, H. D., Sullivan, S., Hopper, L. M., Holmes, A. N., Schultz-Darken, N., Williams, L. E., et al. (in review). All in the family? The response to unequal outcomes in two species of primates with bi-parental care provides support for the importance of interdependence in the selection of social behavior. Journal of Comparative Psychology.Google Scholar
  39. Friedan, E., Cuello, M. I., & Kacelnik, A. (2009). Successive negative contrast in a bird: Starlings’ behaviour after unpredictable negative changes in food quality. Animal Behaviour, 77(4), 857–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Geraci, A., & Surian, L. (2011). The developmental roots of fairness: Infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Developmental Science, 14, 1012–1020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greenberg, A. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 79–103). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review, 91, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hobbes, T. (1991 [orig. 1651]). Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hopper, L. M., Freeman, H. D., Talbot, C. F., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J., Williams, L. E., et al. (in review). Enough is enough! Chimpanzees, but not squirrel monkeys nor owl monkeys, track fluctuating inequity over time. Animal Behavior.Google Scholar
  45. Hopper, L. M., Lambeth, S., Schapiro, S., & Brosnan, S. F. (in review). I want what you have! Female chimpanzees’ response to individual loss is mediated by inequity.Google Scholar
  46. Hopper, L. M., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J., Bernacky, B. J., & Brosnan, S. F. (in review). The ontogeny of social comparisons in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition.Google Scholar
  47. Horner, V., Carter, J. D., Suchak, M., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2011). Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1111088108.Google Scholar
  48. Horowitz, A. (2012). Fair is fine, but more is better: Limits to inequity aversion in the domestic dog. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jensen, K., Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). What’s in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1013–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones, O. D., & Brosnan, S. F. (2008). Law, biology & property: A new theory of the endowment effect. William and Mary Law Review, 49, 1935–1990.Google Scholar
  51. Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2008). Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ welfare. Current Biology, 18, R999–R1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J. S., & Haidt, J. (2011). When getting something good is bad: Even three-year-olds react to inequality. Social Development, 20(1), 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Loewenstein, G. F., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 426–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Massen, J. J. M., van den Berg, L. M., Spruijt, B. M., & Sterck, E. H. M. (2010). Generous leaders and selfish underdogs: Pro-sociality in despotic macaques. PLoS ONE, 5(3), e9734.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Massen, J. J. M., Van den Berg, L. M., Spruijt, B. M., & Sterck, E. H. M. (2011). Inequity aversion in relation to effort and relationship quality in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology, 73, 1–12.Google Scholar
  56. Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006a). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311, 1297–1300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006b). Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: Tolerance constraints on cooperation. Animal Behavior, 72, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Neiworth, J. J., Johnson, E. T., Whillock, K., Greenberg, J., & Brown, V. (2009). Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123(1), 10–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pierce, J., & Bekoff, M. (2012). Wild justice redux: What we know about social justice in animals and why it matters. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Price, S. A., & Brosnan, S. F. (2012). To each according to his need? Variability in the responses to inequity in non-human primates. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 140–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raihani, N. J., Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2010). Punishers benefit from third-party punishment in fish. Science, 327, 171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raihani, N. J., & McAuliffe, K. (2012). Does inequity aversion motivate punishment? Cleaner fish as a model system. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Raihani, N. J., McAuliffe, K., Brosnan, S. F., & Bshary, R. (2012). Are cleaner fish (Labroides dimidiatus) inequity averse? Animal Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.023.
  64. Range, F., Horn, L., Viranyi, Z., & Huber, L. (2008). The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(1), 340–345. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810957105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Range, F., Leitner, K., & Viranyi, Z. (2012). The influence of the relationship and motivation on inequity aversion in dogs. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 170–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reynolds, G. S. (1961). Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 441–466.Google Scholar
  67. Roma, P. G., Silberberg, A., Ruggiero, A. M., & Suomi, S. J. (2006). Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120(1), 67–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Silberberg, A., Crescimbene, L., Addessi, E., Anderson, J. R., & Visalberghi, E. (2009). Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition, 12(3), 505–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Silk, J. B., Brosnan, S. F., Vonk, J., Henrich, J., Povinelli, D. J., Richardson, A. S., et al. (2005). Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature, 437, 1357–1359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Skitka, L. J. (2012). Cross-disciplinary conversations: A psychological perspective on justice research with non-human animals. Social Justice Research, 25(3). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0161-z.
  71. Sloan, S., Baillaregeon, R., & Premack, D. (2012). Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychological Science, 323, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stevens, J. R. (2010). Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Animal Cognition, 13, 663–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tinklepaugh, O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 8, 197–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Townsend, S. W., Deschner, T., & Zuberbühler, K. (2008). Female chimpanzees use copulation calls flexibly to prevent social competition. PLoS ONE, 3(6), e2431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. van Leeuwen, E., Zimmermann, E., & Davila Ross, M. (2010). Responding to inequities: Gorillas try to maintain their competitive advantage during play fights. Biology Letters. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0482.
  76. van Wolkenten, M., Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2007). Inequity responses in monkeys modified by effort. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(47), 18854–18859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vonk, J., Brosnan, S. F., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Richardson, A. S., Lambeth, S., et al. (2008). Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members. Animal Behaviour, 75(5), 1757–1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walster [Hatfield], E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  79. Wynne, C. D. L. (2004). Fair refusal by capuchin monkeys. Nature, 428, 140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yamamoto, S., & Takimoto, A. (2012). Empathy and fairness: Psychological mechanisms for eliciting and maintaining prosociality in primates. Social Justice Research, 25(3). doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0160-0.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Neuroscience Institute and Language Research CenterGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Living Links Center, Yerkes National Primate Research Center and Department of PsychologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations