Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 338–357 | Cite as

Everyday Stranger Harassment and Women’s Objectification

  • Kimberly Fairchild
  • Laurie A. Rudman
Article

Abstract

The present research suggests that stranger harassment (i.e., experiencing unwanted sexual attention from strangers in public) is a frequent experience for young adult women, and that it has negative implications for their well-being. First, stranger harassment was positively related to self-objectification (Fredrickson & Roberts, Psychol Women Quart 21:173–206 1997). This was true for women who coped with stranger harassment using common strategies (passive, self-blame, or benign), but not for women who used an uncommon, active coping strategy (e.g., confronting the harasser). Second, stranger harassment experiences and self-objectification were positively related to women’s fear of and perceived risk of rape. Further, women who feared rape were more likely to restrict their freedom of movement. In concert, the findings suggest that stranger harassment may have both direct and indirect negative effects on women’s lives, and that it is a phenomenon worthy of future research.

Keywords

Stranger harassment Sexual harassment Self-objectification Fear of rape 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by Grant BCS-0417335 from the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Atwood, M. (1986). The handmaid’s tale. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  2. Berdahl, J. (2007a). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 425–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berdahl, J. (2007b). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, C. G. (1993). Street harassment and the informal ghettoization of women. Harvard Law Review, 106, 517–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferraro, K. (1996). Women’s fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault? Social Forces, 75, 667–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher, B. S., & Sloan, J. J. (2003). Unraveling the fear of victimization among college women: Is the “shadow of sexual assault hypothesis” supported? Justice Quarterly, 20, 633–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitzgerald, L. F. (1990). Assessing strategies for coping with sexual harassment: A theoretical/empirical approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Women in Psychology, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995a). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzgerald, L. F., Hulin, C. L., & Drasgow, F. (1995b). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: An integrated model. In G. P. Keita & J. J. Hurrell (Eds.), Job stress in a changing workforce: Investigating gender diversity, and family issues (pp. 55–73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  11. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner, C. B. (1995). Passing by: Gender and public harassment. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 33 (pp. 115–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenleaf, C. (2005). Self-objectification among physically active women. Sex Roles, 52, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruber, J. E. (1989). How women handle sexual harassment: A literature review. Sociology and Social Research, 74, 3–9.Google Scholar
  18. Gutek, B. A., & Done, R. S. (2001). Sexual harassment. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook for the psychology of women and gender. (pp. 367–387). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, M. B., & Miller, K. C. (2000). Gender and perceptions of danger. Sex Roles, 43, 843–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrison K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Women’s sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in Black and White adolescent females. Journal of Communication, 53, 216–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1997). College women’s fears and precautionary behaviors relating to acquaintance rape and stranger rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Japan tries women-only train cars to stop groping. (June 10, 2005). http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/International/story?id=803965&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312. Accessed 14 June 2005.
  23. Johnson, H., & Sacco, V. F. (1995). Researching violence against women: Statistics Canada’s national survey. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 281–304.Google Scholar
  24. Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, H. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 439–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klonoff, E. A., Landrine, H., & Campbell, R. (2000). Sexist discrimination may account for well-known gender differences in psychiatric symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krahe, B. (2005). Cognitive coping with the threat of rape: Vigilance and cognitive avoidance. Journal of Personality, 73, 609–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landrine, H., & Klonoff, E. A. (1997). Discriminating against women: Prevalence, consequences, and remedies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Gibbs, J., Manning, V., & Lund, M. (1995). Physical and psychiatric correlates of gender discrimination: An application of the schedule of sexist events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacMillan, R., Nierobisz, A., & Welsh, S. (2000). Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Magley, V. J. (2002). Coping with sexual harassment: Reconceptualizing women’s resistance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 930–945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Magley, V. J., Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & DeNardo, M. (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 390–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muehlenkamp, J. J., Swanson, J. D., & Brausch, A. M. (2005). Self-objectification, risk-taking, and self-harm in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nielsen, L. B. (2000). Situating legal consciousness: Experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law & Society Review, 34, 1055–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pryor, J. B., & McKinney, K. (1995). Research advances in sexual harassment: Introduction and overview. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 421–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 401–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheffield, C. J. (1989). The invisible intruder: Women’s experiences of obscene phone calls. Gender and Society, 3, 483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sussman, A. (2006) In Rio rush hour, women relax in single sex trains. http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm?aid=2750. Accessed 23 May 2006.
  41. Swim, J. K., Cohen, L. L., & Hyers, L. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 37–60). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Warr, M. (1985). Fear of rape among urban women. Social Problems, 32, 238–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiener, R. L., & Gutek, B. A. (1999). Advances in sexual harassment research, theory, and policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyManhattan CollegeRiverdaleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Tillett HallRutgers, the State University of New JerseyPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations