Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Building Community One Relationship at a Time: Consequences for the Seeking and Acceptance of Help

Abstract

Three studies test the hypothesis that a perceived relationship is relevant to seeking and accepting help. The results first indicate a direct effect for a perceived relationship on the extent to which people are willing to seek and accept help. The findings further indicate that perceiving a relationship increases the importance of procedural justice judgments in shaping the decision to seek and accept help. This was true both in vertical relations (e.g., student–professor, resident–police officer) and in horizontal ones (e.g., student–student). The research extends prior findings showing that common group membership increases the influence of procedural justice judgments on whether people cooperate with fellow group members. The results show a parallel with the effects of a perceived relationship, suggesting a comparability between “relational” and “collective” levels of identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage

  2. Andersen S. M., Reznik I., Manzella L. M. (1996) Eliciting facial affect, motivation, and expectancies in transference: Significant-other representations in social relations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 71:1108–1129

  3. Andersen S. M., Chen S. (2002) The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychol. Rev., 109:619–645

  4. Andersen, S.M., Cole, S. (1990). Do I know you?: The role of significant others in general social perception. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 59:384–399

  5. Andersen S. M., Reznik I., Chen S. (1997) The self in relation to others: Cognitive and motivational underpinnings. In: J. G. Snodgrass, R. L. Thompson (Eds.), The Self Across Psychology: Self-Recognition, Self-Awareness, and The Self-Concept. New York, New York Academy of Science, pp. 233–275

  6. Andersen S. M., Reznik I., Glassman N. S. (2005) The unconscious relational self. In: R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The New Unconscious. New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 421–481

  7. Andersen, S. M., and Saribay, S. A. (2005). Thinking integratively about social psychology: The example of the relational self and the social-cognitive process of transference. In Van Lange P. A. M. (ed.), Bridging Social Psychology, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

  8. Aron A., Aron E. N., Tudor M., Nelson G. (1991) Close relationships as including other in the self. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 60:241–253

  9. Baldwin M. W. (1992) Relational schemas and the processing of information. Psychol. Bull., 112:461–484

  10. Baldwin M. W., Sinclair L. (1996) Self-esteem and “if...then” contingencies of interpersonal acceptance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 71:1130–1141

  11. Baum, A., Andersen, S.M. (1999). Interpersonal roles in transference: Transient mood states under the condition of significant-other activation. Soc. Cogn., 17:161–185.

  12. Baumeister R. F., Leary M. R. (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull., 117:497–529

  13. Berk, M.S., Andersen, S. M. (2000). The impact of past relationships on interpersonal behavior: Behavioral confirmation in the social-cognitive process of transference. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 79:546–562

  14. Brewer M. B, Gardner W. (1996) Who is this “we?” Levels of collective identity and self representations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 71:83–93

  15. Bolger N., Foster M., Vinokur A. D., Ng R. (1996) Close relationships and adjustments to a life crisis: The case of breast cancer. J. Pers.Soc. Psychol., 70:283–294

  16. Chen S., Andersen S. M. (1999) Relationships from the past in the present: Significant-other representations and transference in interpersonal life. In: M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 31. San Diego, Academic Press, pp. 123–190

  17. Glassman, N. S., Andersen, S. M. (1999). Activating transference without consciousness: Using significant-other representations to go beyond what is subliminally given. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 77:1146–1162

  18. Gleason M. E. J., Ida M., Bolger N., Shrout P. E. (2003) Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 29:1036–1045

  19. Hazan, C., and Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychol. Inq., 5, 1–22, Lawrence Erlbaum

  20. Hinkley, K., Andersen, S. M. (1996). The working self-concept in transference: Significant-other activation and self change. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 71:1279–1295

  21. Hogg M. A., Hardie E. A. (1991) Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 17:175–180

  22. Huo Y. J., Smith H. J., Tyler T. R., Lind E. A. (1996) Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns. Psychol. Sci., 7:40–45

  23. Knisely J. E., Northouse L. (1994) The relationship between social support, help seeking behavior, and psychological distress in psychiatric clients. Arch. Psych. Nur., 8:357–365

  24. Nadler A., Fisher J. D., Itzhak S. B. (1983) With a little help from my friend? Effect of single or multiple act aid as a function of donor and task characteristics. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 44:310–321

  25. Rasinski K., Tyler T. R., Fridkin K. (1985) Exploring the function of legitimacy: Mediating effects of personal and institutional legitimacy on leadership endorsement and system support. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 49:386–394

  26. Reis, H. T., and Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Duck, S., Hay, D. F., Hobfoll, S. E., Ickes, W. and Montgomery, B. M. (eds.), Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interventions, John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, England, pp. 367-389, xvii, 702 pp.

  27. Rusbult, C. E., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In Higgins, E. T, and Kruglanski, A. W. (eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, pp. 564–596, x, 948 pp.

  28. Russel V., Gaffney P., Collins K., Bergin A., Bedford D. (2004) Problems experienced by young men and attitudes to help-seeking in a rural Irish community. Irish J. Psychol. Med., 21:6–10

  29. Sedikides C., Brewer M. B. (2001) Individual self, relational self, or collective self: Partners, opponents, or stangers? In C. Sedikides, M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage

  30. Shapiro G. E. (1989) Is seeking help from a friend like seeking help from a stranger? Soc. Psychol. Quart., 43:259–263

  31. Smith E. R., Henry S. (1996) An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 22:635–642

  32. Smith H. J., Tyler T. R. (1996) Justice and power: Can justice motivations and superordinate categorizations encourage the advantaged to support policies that redistribute economic resources and encourage the disadvantaged to obey the law?. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 26:171–200

  33. Smith H. J., Tyler T. R., Huo Y. J., Ortiz D., Lind E. A. (1998) The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. J. Experim. Soc. Psychol., 34:470–493

  34. Tajfel H., Turner J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: W. G. Austin, S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA, Brooks/Cole, pp. 33–47

  35. Tyler T. R. (1989) The psychology of procedural justice. A test of the group value model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 57:830–838

  36. Tyler, T.R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT, US: Yale University Press.

  37. Tyler T. R. (1994) Psychological models of the justice motive. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 67:850–863

  38. Tyler T. R. (2006) Process utility and help seeking. J. Econ. Psychol., 27:360–376

  39. Tyler T. R., Blader S. (2000) Cooperation in Groups. Philadelphia, Psychology Press

  40. Tyler T. R., Degoey P., Smith H. J. (1996) Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters. J.Pers.Soc. Psychol., 70:913–930

  41. Tyler T. R., Huo Y. J. (2002) Trust in the Law. N.Y., Russell-Sage

  42. Tyler T. R., Lind E. A. (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. Advan. Experim. Soc. Psychol., 25:115–191

  43. Tyler T. R., Lind E. A., Ohbuchi K., Sugawara I., Huo Y. J. (1998) Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 24:137–146

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Erin Cotrone, Marlone Henderson, and Zahra Nahar-Brown for their assistance on this research project.

Author information

Correspondence to Angelina Davis-Lipman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis-Lipman, A., Tyler, T.R. & Andersen, S.M. Building Community One Relationship at a Time: Consequences for the Seeking and Acceptance of Help. Soc Just Res 20, 181–206 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0038-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • relational self
  • perceived relationships
  • help seeking
  • help acceptance
  • procedural justice
  • group value model