Social Justice Research

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 98–116 | Cite as

When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize

Article

Researchers in moral psychology and social justice have agreed that morality is about matters of harm, rights, and justice. On this definition of morality, conservative opposition to social justice programs appears to be immoral, and has been explained as a product of various non-moral processes such as system justification or social dominance orientation. In this article we argue that, from an anthropological perspective, the moral domain is usually much broader, encompassing many more aspects of social life and valuing institutions as much or more than individuals. We present theoretical and empirical reasons for believing that there are five psychological systems that provide the foundations for the world’s many moralities. The five foundations are psychological preparations for detecting and reacting emotionally to issues related to harm/care, fairness/reciprocity, ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, and purity/sanctity. Political liberals have moral intuitions primarily based upon the first two foundations, and therefore misunderstand the moral motivations of political conservatives, who generally rely upon all five foundations.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Brian Nosek, Stacey Sinclair, and Kees van den Bos for helpful comments on earlier drafts.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside Human Cruelty and Violence. New York: W. H. FreemanGoogle Scholar
  3. Boehm C. (1999). Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom P. (2004). Descartes’ Baby: How the Science of Child Development explains What Makes us Human. New York: BasicGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown D. E. (1991). Human Universals. Philadelphia: Temple University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. de Waal F. (1996). Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Durkheim, E. (1951/1897). Suicide (J. A. Spalding & G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiske A. P. (1992). Four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychol Rev, 99: 689–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garcia J., Koelling R. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychon. Sci. 4: 123–124Google Scholar
  10. Gilligan C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilligan C., Wiggins G. (1987). The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In: J. Kagan, S. Lamb (Eds.), The Emergence of Morality in Young Children. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham, J., Haidt, J., and Nosek, B. (2007). The moral foundations of liberals and conservatives. Unpublished manuscript, University of VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Haidt J. (2006). The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  14. Haidt J., and Bjorklund F. (in press). Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality Google Scholar
  15. Haidt J., Hersh M. A. (2001). Sexual morality: The cultures and reasons of liberals and conservatives. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 31: 191–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haidt, J., and Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, Fall: 55–66Google Scholar
  17. Haidt J., and Joseph C. (in press). The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In Carruthers, P. Laurence, S., and Stich, S. (eds.), The Innate Mind, Vol. 3 Google Scholar
  18. Haidt J., Koller S., Dias M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 65: 613–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henrich J., Gil-White F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred status as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol. Human Behav., 22: 165–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hing L. S. S., Bobocel D. R., Zanna M. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 83: 493–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hollos M., Leis P., Turiel E. (1986). Social reasoning in Ijo children and adolescents in Nigerian communities. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol., 17: 352–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter J. D. (1991). Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  23. Jensen L. A. (1997). Culture wars: American moral divisions across the adult lifespan. J. Adult Dev., 4: 107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen L. A. (1998). Moral divisions within countries between orthodoxy and progressivism: India and the united states. J. Scient Stud. Religion, 37: 90–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jost J. T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A. W., Sulloway F. J. (2003). Political conservativism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull., 129: 339–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohlberg L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNallyGoogle Scholar
  27. Kristol I. (1978). Two Cheers for Capitalism. New York: BasicGoogle Scholar
  28. Leakey R. (1994). The Origin of Humankind. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  29. Muller J. Z. (1997). What is conservative social and political thought? In J. Z. Muller (Ed.), Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the present (pp. 3–31). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L. M., Malle B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 67: 741–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratzinger, J. (2004). Introduction to Christianity, 2nd Ed. (J. R. Foster & M. J. Miller, Trans.): Ignatius PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Rozin P., Haidt J., McCauley C. R. (1999). Disgust: The body and soul emotion. In T. Dalgleish, M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 429–445). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & SonsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rozin P., Haidt J., McCauley C. R. (2000). Disgust. In M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 2nd ed. (pp. 637–653). New York: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz S. H., Bilsky W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 58: 878–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seligman M. E. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behav. Therapy, 2: 307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shweder R. (1990). In defense of moral realism: Reply to Gabennesch. Child Dev., 61: 2060–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shweder R. A., Mahapatra M., Miller J. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan, S. Lamb (Eds.), The Emergence of Morality in Young Children (pp. 1–83). Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Shweder R. A., Much N. C., Mahapatra M., Park L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt, P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and Health. (pp. 119–169). New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Sniderman P.M., Piazza T. (1993). The Scar of Race. Cambridge, MA: HarvardGoogle Scholar
  40. Sperber D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. A. Hirschfeld, S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (pp. 39–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Trivers R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart. Rev. Biol., 46, 35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turiel E. (1983). The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations