Advertisement

Social Justice Research

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 365–378 | Cite as

The Development of System Justification in the Developing World

  • P. J. HenryEmail author
  • Andrea Saul
Article

Abstract

System justification theorists have proposed that under some circumstances ‘‘people who suffer the most from a given state of affairs are paradoxically the least likely to question, challenge, reject, or change it’’ Jost et al. (2003). These claims are contrary to theories that suggest that group members seek to enhance their self-interest or group-interest (e.g., realistic group conflict theory, rational choice models). The present study, conducted in one of the poorest countries in the world, Bolivia, tested if even the most impoverished people of the world will endorse beliefs justifying the status quo. A survey of 356 Bolivian school children found that low-status children endorse beliefs in the effectiveness of government in meeting the people’s needs more than their high-status counterparts. The results suggest that system-justifying beliefs are endorsed by low-status group members in even the most extreme cases of poverty, and even among the youngest politically aware members of society, and they raise questions about the capacity for true social change in those parts of the world that may need it the most.

Keywords

system justification social dominance legitimizing ideologies intergroup relations status  power 

References

  1. Aronson, E., and Mills, J. (1959). The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group. J. Abnormal Soc. Psychol. 59: 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck P. A., Jennings M. K., (1991). Family traditions, political periods, and the development of partisan attitudes J. Politics 53: 742–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bobo L. D., (1983). Whites’ opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict? J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 45: 1196–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Central Intelligence Agency (2005). The World Factbook Potomac Books Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Festinger, L., and Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. J. Abnormal Soc. Psychol., 58: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiorina M., (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections Yale University Press New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  7. Fortune 500 Largest U.S. Corporations. (2004, April 5). Fortune, p. F1Google Scholar
  8. Glick P., et al., (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 79: 763–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gurr T. R., (1970). Why Men Rebel Princeton University Press Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Hemming J., (1970). The Conquest of the Incas Harcourt San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  11. Hepworth J. T., West J. G., (1988). Lynchings and the economy: A time-series reanalysis of Hovland and Sears (1940) J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 55: 239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hess R. D., Torney J. V., (1967). The Development of Political Attitudes in Children Aldine ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson J. W., (1993). Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature Psychol. Record 43: 395–414Google Scholar
  14. Jennings M. K., Niemi R. G., (1974). The Political Character of Adolescence Princeton University Press PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Jost J. T., (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness Political Psychol. 16: 397–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jost J. T., Banaji M. R., (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 33: 1–27Google Scholar
  17. Jost J. T., Banaji M. R., Nosek B. A., (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo Political Psychol. 25: 881–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jost J. T., Pelham B. W., Sheldon O., Sullivan B. N., (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 33: 13–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kay A. C., Jimenez M., Jost J. T., (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 1300–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Key V. O. Jr., (1961). Public Opinion and American Democracy Knopf. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Major B., (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group memberships Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 26: 269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Major B., Gramzow R. H., McCoy S. K., Levin S., Schmader T., Sidanius J., (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 82: 269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rubin M., Hewstone M., (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al Political Psychol. 25: 823–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rudman L. A., Feinberg J., Fairchild K., (2002). Minority members’ implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status Soc. Cognition 20: 294–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sachdev I., Bourhis R. Y., (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 17: 277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sachdev I., Bourhis R. Y., (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 21: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scott J. C., (1987). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance Yale University Press New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  28. Sears D. O., Valentino N. A., (1997). Politics matters: Political events as catalysts for preadult socialization Am. Political Sci. Rev. 91: 45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shapiro M. J., (1969). Rational political man: A synthesis of economic and social psychological perspectives Am. Political Sci. Rev. 128: 115–128Google Scholar
  30. Sherif M., (1966). Group Conflict and Cooperation: Their Social Psychology Routledge & Kegan Paul LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Sidanius J., Pratto F., (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression Cambridge University Press. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Tajfel H., Turner J. C., (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior In Worchel S., Austin W. G., (Eds.), The Psychology of Intergroup Relations Nelson-Hall. Chicago (pp. 7–24)Google Scholar
  33. Tapp J. L., Kohlberg L., (1971). Developing senses of law and legal justice J. Soc. Issues 27: 65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uhlmann E., Dasgupta N., Elgueta A., Greenwald A. G., Swanson J., (2002). Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America Soc. Cognition 20: 198–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. United Nations Development Programme (2004). Human Development Report 2004: Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World United Nations Development Programme New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyDePaul UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations