Advertisement

Solar Physics

, 293:118 | Cite as

Tilt of Sunspot Bipoles in Solar Cycles 15 to 24

  • Ksenia Tlatova
  • Andrey Tlatov
  • Alexei Pevtsov
  • Kalevi Mursula
  • Valeria Vasil’eva
  • Elina Heikkinen
  • Luca Bertello
  • Alexander Pevtsov
  • Ilpo Virtanen
  • Nina Karachik
Article

Abstract

We use recently digitized sunspot drawings from Mount Wilson Observatory to investigate the latitudinal dependence of tilt angles of active regions and its change with solar cycle. The drawings cover the period from 1917 to present and contain information as regards polarity and strength of magnetic field in sunspots. We identified clusters of sunspots of same polarity, and used these clusters to form “bipole pairs”. The orientation of these bipole pairs was used to measure their tilts. We find that the latitudinal profile of tilts does not monotonically increase with latitude as most previous studies assumed, but instead, it shows a clear maximum at about 25 – 30 degree latitudes. Functional dependence of tilt (\(\gamma\)) on latitude (\(\varphi\)) was found to be \(\gamma= (0.20\pm0.08) \sin(2.80 \varphi) + (-0.00\pm0.06)\). We also find that latitudinal dependence of tilts varies from one solar cycle to another, but larger tilts do not seem to result in stronger solar cycles. Finally, we find the presence of a systematic offset in tilt of active regions (non-zero tilts at the equator), with odd cycles exhibiting negative offset and even cycles showing the positive offset.

Keywords

Sun: activity Sun: magnetic fields Sunspots 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Work of individual co-authors was supported by their national grants and projects: the Academy of Finland to the ReSoLVE Centre of Excellence (project no. 272157), the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR, project 18-02-00098), the Russian Science Foundation (RSF, project 15-12-20001), and NASA’s grant NNX15AE95G. The authors are members of international team on Reconstructing Solar and Heliospheric Magnetic Field Evolution Over the Past Century supported by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI), Bern, Switzerland. The National Solar Observatory (NSO) is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA), Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Babcock, H.W.: 1961, The topology of the Sun’s magnetic field and the 22-year cycle. Astrophys. J. 133, 572. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumann, I., Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M., Solanki, S.K.: 2004, Evolution of the large-scale magnetic field on the solar surface: A parameter study. Astron. Astrophys. 426, 1075. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cameron, R.H., Jiang, J., Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M.: 2010, Surface flux transport modeling for solar cycles 15–21: Effects of cycle-dependent tilt angles of sunspot groups. Astrophys. J. 719, 264. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canfield, R.C., Pevtsov, A.A.: 1998, Helicity of solar active-region magnetic fields. In: Balasubramaniam, K.S., Harvey, J., Rabin, D. (eds.) Synoptic Solar Physics, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 140, 131. ADS. Google Scholar
  5. Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Cameron, R., Peñuela, T.: 2010, Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle. Astron. Astrophys. 518, A7. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Cameron, R., Peñuela, T.: 2013, Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle (Corrigendum). Astron. Astrophys. 556, C3. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, G.H., Fan, Y., Howard, R.F.: 1995, Comparisons between theory and observation of active region tilts. Astrophys. J. 438, 463. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher, G.H., Fan, Y., Longcope, D.W., Linton, M.G., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2000, The solar dynamo and emerging flux (Invited review). Solar Phys. 192, 119. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., Joy, A.H.: 1919, The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys. J. 49, 153. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holder, Z.A., Canfield, R.C., McMullen, R.A., Nandy, D., Howard, R.F., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2004, On the tilt and twist of solar active regions. Astrophys. J. 611, 1149. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howard, R.F.: 1991, Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 136, 251. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ivanov, V.G.: 2012, Joy’s law and its features according to the data of three sunspot catalogs. Geomagn. Aeron. 52, 999. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kosovichev, A.G., Stenflo, J.O.: 2008, Tilt of emerging bipolar magnetic regions on the Sun. Astrophys. J. Lett. 688, L115. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leighton, R.B.: 1969, A magneto-kinematic model of the solar cycle. Astrophys. J. 156, 1. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, J., Ulrich, R.K.: 2012, Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles. Astrophys. J. 758, 115. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Longcope, D., Linton, M., Pevtsov, A., Fisher, G., Klapper, I.: 1999, Twisted flux tubes and how they get that way. In: Magnetic Helicity in Space and Laboratory Plasmas, Geophysical Monograph Series 111, 93. DOI. ADS. Google Scholar
  17. McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A.: 2013, Recovering Joy’s law as a function of solar cycle, hemisphere, and longitude. Solar Phys. 287, 215. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A.: 2016, Tilt angle and footpoint separation of small and large bipolar sunspot regions observed with HMI. Astrophys. J. 818, 7. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A., Li, J.: 2014, Re-examining sunspot tilt angle to include anti-hale statistics. Astrophys. J. 797, 130. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mursula, K., Zieger, B.: 2001, Long-term north-south asymmetry in solar wind speed inferred from geomagnetic activity: A new type of century-scale solar oscillation? Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 95. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mursula, K., Hiltula, T., Zieger, B.: 2002, Latitudinal gradients of solar wind speed around the ecliptic: Systematic displacement of the streamer belt. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1738. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nagy, M., Lemerle, A., Labonville, F., Petrovay, K., Charbonneau, P.: 2017, The effect of “rogue” active regions on the solar cycle. Solar Phys. 292, 167. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norton, A.A., Gilman, P.A.: 2005, Recovering solar toroidal field dynamics from sunspot location patterns. Astrophys. J. 630, 1194. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pevtsov, A.A., Clette, F.: 2014, To understand future solar activity, one has to know the past. EOS. DOI. Google Scholar
  25. Pevtsov, A.A., Berger, M.A., Nindos, A., Norton, A.A., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L.: 2014, Magnetic helicity, tilt, and twist. Space Sci. Rev. 186, 285. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran. The Art of Scientific Computing. ADS. MATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Pulkkinen, P.J., Brooke, J., Pelt, J., Tuominen, I.: 1999, Long-term variation of sunspot latitudes. Astron. Astrophys. 341, L43. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Sattarov, I., Pevtsov, A.A., Hojaev, A.S., Sherdonov, C.T.: 2002, X-Ray bright points and photospheric bipoles during cycles 22 and 23. Astrophys. J. 564, 1042. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sivaraman, K.R., Gupta, S.S., Howard, R.F.: 1999, Measurement of Kodaikanal white-light images, IV: Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 189, 69. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stenflo, J.O., Kosovichev, A.G.: 2012, Bipolar magnetic regions on the Sun: Global analysis of the SOHO/MDI data set. Astrophys. J. 745, 129. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tian, L., Liu, Y., Yang, J., Alexander, D.: 2005, The role of the kink instability of a long-lived active region AR 9604. Solar Phys. 229, 237. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tlatov, A.G., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2010, The latitude of ephemeral regions as an indicator for solar-cycle strength. Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. 81, 814. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar
  33. Tlatov, A.G., Vasil’eva, V.V., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2010, Distribution of magnetic bipoles on the sun over three solar cycles. Astrophys. J. 717, 357. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tlatova, K.A., Vasil’eva, V.V., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2015, Long-term variations in the sunspot magnetic fields and bipole properties from 1918 to 2014. Geomagn. Aeron. 55, 896. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yeates, A.R., Baker, D., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L.: 2015, Source of a prominent poleward surge during solar cycle 24. Solar Phys. 290, 3189. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zirin, H.: 1988, Astrophysics of the Sun, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. ADS. Google Scholar
  37. Zolotova, N.V., Ponyavin, D.I., Marwan, N., Kurths, J.: 2009, Long-term asymmetry in the wings of the butterfly diagram. Astron. Astrophys. 503, 197. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg State UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Kislovodsk Mountain Astronomical Station of Pulkovo ObservatoryKislovodskRussia
  3. 3.Kalmyk State UniversityElistaRussia
  4. 4.National Solar ObservatoryBoulderUSA
  5. 5.ReSoLVE Centre of Excellence, Space Climate Research UnitUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  6. 6.Astronomical Institute AS RUzTashkentUzbekistan

Personalised recommendations