Advertisement

Solar Physics

, 293:104 | Cite as

A Curious History of Sunspot Penumbrae: An Update

  • V. M. S. Carrasco
  • J. M. Vaquero
  • R. M. Trigo
  • M. C. Gallego
Article

Abstract

The ratio of penumbral to umbral area of sunspots is an important topic for solar and geophysical studies. Hathaway (Solar Phys.286, 347, 2013) found a curious behaviour in this parameter for small sunspot groups (areas smaller than 100 millionths of solar hemisphere, msh) using records from Royal Greenwich Observatory (RGO). Hathaway showed that the penumbra–umbra ratio decreased smoothly from more than 7 in 1905 to lower than 3 by 1930 and then increased to almost 8 in 1961. Thus, Hathaway proposed the existence of a secular variation in the penumbra–umbra area ratio. In order to confirm that secular variation, we employ data of the sunspot catalogue published by the Coimbra Astronomical Observatory (COI) for the period 1929 – 1941. Our results disagree with the penumbra–umbra ratio found by Hathaway for that period. However, the behaviour of this ratio for large (areas greater or equal than 100 msh) and small groups registered in COI during 1929 – 1941 is similar to data available from RGO for the periods 1874 – 1914 and 1950 – 1976. Nevertheless, while the average values and time evolution of the ratio in large groups are similar those for small groups according to the Coimbra data (1929 – 1941) it is not analogous for RGO data for the same period. We also found that the behaviour of the penumbra–umbra area ratio for smaller groups in both observatories is significantly different. The main difference between the area measurements made in Coimbra and RGO is associated with the umbra measurements. We would like to stress that the two observatories used different methods of observation and while in COI both methodology and instruments did not change during the study period, some changes were carried out in RGO that could have affected measurements of umbra and penumbra. These facts illustrate the importance of the careful recovery of past solar data.

Keywords

Sunspots, statistics Sunspot, umbra Sunspot, penumbrae 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partly funded by FEDER-Junta de Extremadura (Research Group Grant GR15137 and project IB16127) and from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish Government (AYA2014-57556-P and CGL2017-87917-P). The authors have benefited from the participation in the ISSI workshops.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Antalová, A.: 1971, The ratio of penumbral and umbral areas of sun-spots in the 11-year solar activity cycle. Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov. 22, 352. ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmaceda, L.A., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Foster, S.: 2009, A homogeneous database of sunspot areas covering more than 130 years. J. Geophys. Res. 114, A07104. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baranyi, T., Győri, L., Ludmány, A.: 2016, On-line tools for solar data compiled at the Debrecen Observatory and their extensions with the Greenwich Sunspot Data. Solar Phys. 291, 3081. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borrero, J.M., Ichimoto, K.: 2011, Magnetic structure of sunspots. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 8, 4. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray, R.J., Loughhead, R.E.: 1964, Sunspots, Dover, New York. Google Scholar
  6. Carrasco, V.M.S., Vaquero, J.M., Aparicio, A.J.P., Gallego, M.C.: 2014, Sunspot catalogue of the Valencia Observatory (1920 – 1928). Solar Phys. 289, 4351. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casas, R., Vaquero, J.M.: 2014, The sunspot catalogues of Carrington, Peters and de la Rue: Quality control and machine-readable versions. Solar Phys. 289, 79. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clette, F., Svalgaard, L., Vaquero, J.M., Cliver, E.W.: 2014, Revisiting the Sunspot Number. A 400-year perspective on the solar cycle. Space Sci. Rev. 186, 35. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. da Costa Lobo, F.M.: 1929, Introdução. In: Anais do Observatório Astronómico da Universidade de Coimbra, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra. Google Scholar
  10. Dasi-Espuig, M., Jiang, J., Krivova, N.A., Solanki, S.K., Unruh, Y.C., Yeo, K.L.: 2016, Reconstruction of spectral solar irradiance since 1700 from simulated magnetograms. Astron. Astrophys. 590, A63. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de la Rue, W., Stewart, B., Loewy, B.: 1869, Researches on solar physics. Heliographical positions and areas of sun-spots observed with the Kew Photoheliograph during the years 1862 and 1863. Phil. Trans. 159, 1. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de la Rue, W., Stewart, B., Loewy, B.: 1870, Researches on solar physics. No. II. The positions and areas of the spots observed at Kew during the years 1864, 1865, 1866, also the Spotted Area of the Sun’s visible disk from the commencement of 1832 up to May 1868. Phil. Trans. 160, 389. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foukal, P.: 2014, An explanation of the differences between the sunspot area scales of the Royal Greenwich and Mt. Wilson observatories, and the SOON program. Solar Phys. 289, 1517. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gleissberg, W.: 1939, A long-periodic fluctuation of the sun-spot numbers. Observatory 62, 158. ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Hathaway, D.H.: 2013, A curious history of sunspot penumbrae. Solar Phys. 286, 347. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jensen, E., Nordø, J., Ringnes, T.S.: 1955, Variations in the structure of sunspots in relation to the sunspot cycle. Astrophys. Nor. 5, 167. ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiess, C., Rezaei, R., Schmidt, W.: 2014, Properties of sunspot umbrae observed in cycle 24. Astron. Astrophys. 565, A52. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lefèvre, L., Clette, F.: 2014, Survey and merging of sunspot catalogs. Solar Phys. 289, 545. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lefèvre, L., Aparicio, A.J.P., Gallego, M.C., Vaquero, J.M.: 2016, An early sunspot catalog by Miguel Aguilar for the period 1914 – 1920. Solar Phys. 291, 2609. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leonardo, A.J.F., Martins, D.R., Fiolhais, C.: 2011, Costa Lobo and the study of the Sun in Coimbra in the first half of the twentieth century. J. Astron. Hist. Herit. 14, 41. ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Mandal, S., Hegde, M., Samanta, T., Hazra, G., Banerjee, D., Ravindra, B.: 2017, Kodaikanal digitized white-light data archive (1921 – 2011): Analysis of various solar cycle features. Astron. Astrophys. 601, A106. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McIntosh, P.S.: 1990, The classification of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 125, 251. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mouradian, Z., Garcia, A.: 2007, Eightieth Anniversary of Solar Physics at Coimbra, The Physics of Chromospheric Plasmas ASP Conference Series 368, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco. Google Scholar
  24. Observatorio Astronómico da Universidade de Coimbra: 1975, Anais do Observatório Astronómico da Universidade de Coimbra, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra. Google Scholar
  25. Tandberg-Hanssen, E.: 1956, A study of the penumbra–umbra ratio of sunspot pairs. Astrophys. Nor. 5, 207. ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Usoskin, I.G.: 2017, A history of solar activity over millennia. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 14, 3. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vaquero, J.M., Gordillo, A., Gallego, M.C., Sánchez-Bajo, F., García, J.A.: 2005, The umbra–penumbra area ratio of sunspots from the de la Rue data. Observatory 125, 152. ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Waldmeier, M.: 1939, Über die Struktur der Sonnenflecken. Astron. Mitt. Zür. 14, 439. ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. Watson, F.T., Fletcher, L., Marshall, S.: 2011, Evolution of sunspot properties during solar cycle 23. Astron. Astrophys. 533, A14. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Willis, D.M., Davda, V.D., Stephenson, F.R.: 1996, Comparison between oriental and occidental sunspot observations. Q. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 37, 189. ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. Willis, D.M., Coffey, H.E., Henwood, R., Erwin, E.H., Hoyt, D.V., Wild, M.N., Denig, W.F.: 2013, The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874 – 1976): Summary of the observations, applications, datasets, definitions and errors. Solar Phys. 288, 117. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de FísicaUniversidad de ExtremaduraBadajozSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de FísicaUniversidad de ExtremaduraMéridaSpain
  3. 3.Instituto Universitario de Investigación del Agua, Cambio Climático y Sostenibilidad (IACYS)Universidad de ExtremaduraBadajozSpain
  4. 4.Instituto Dom Luiz (IDL), Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations