# Effects of Steady Flow on Magnetoacoustic-Gravity Surface Waves: I. The Weak Field Case

## Abstract

Magnetoacoustic gravity (MAG) waves have been studied for some time. In this article, we investigate the effect that a shear flow at a tangential discontinuity embedded in a gravitationally stratified and magnetised plasma has on MAG surface waves. The dispersion relation found is algebraically analogous to the relation of the non-flow cases obtained by Miles and Roberts (*Solar Phys.* **141**, 205, 1992), except for the introduction of a Doppler-shifted frequency for the eigenvalue. This feature, however, introduces rather interesting physics, including the asymmetric presence of forward- and backward-propagating surface waves. We find that increasing the equilibrium flow speed leads to a shift in the permitted regions of propagation for surface waves. For most wave number combinations this leads to the fast mode being completely removed, as well as more limited phase speed regimes for slow-mode propagation. We also find that upon increasing the flow, the phase speeds of the backward propagating waves are increased. Eventually, at high enough flow speeds, the wave’s direction of propagation is reversed and is in the positive direction. However, the phase speed of the forward-propagating wave remains mainly the same. For strong enough flows we find that the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability can also occur when the forward- and backward-propagating modes couple.

## Keywords

Flow Dynamics Waves Magnetic fields Kelvin–Helmholtz## 1 Introduction

Wave phenomena that can be modelled as surface waves are ubiquitous in nature. They may occur when a medium changes properties at an interface, with perturbations of largest amplitude at the interface (surface) and perturbations decaying away from the surface. In a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) sense, the change in magnetic field (or other properties *e.g.* density, temperature, *etc.*) of a plasma at an interface can lead to perturbations propagating along the interface in the form of magnetoacoustic surface waves (Roberts, 1981a,b). If the plasma is embedded in a gravitational field (perpendicular to the magnetic field), magnetoacoustic-gravity (MAG) surface waves can occur (Miles and Roberts, 1992). These surface waves are of considerable interest in a solar context *e.g.* for coronal heating or oscillations in sunspot penumbrae (see *e.g.* Giovanelli, 1972 or for more recent studies Freij *et al.*, 2014).

Many plasmas in nature, however, do not exhibit static equilibria, and for the most part, are dynamical; strong background equilibrium flows may occur. For example, the interior of the Sun is highly dynamical, exhibiting large-scale flows, *e.g.* differential rotation; close to the surface, meridional flows; and small-scale flows of the surface *e.g.* penumbral flows (Evershed flow). As a next step, it is therefore sensible to study magnetoacoustic surface waves in such media considering the effect of flow. The addition of a uniform steady flow in a uniform and infinite medium will just lead to the Doppler shift of the wave frequencies. However, any variations in the medium (*e.g.* discontinuities or smooth variations) or in the steady flow affect the surface wave propagation to a greater and more complex extent.

In this study, we investigate the effect of a steady flow at a tangential discontinuity. The equilibrium plasma is similar to that given in Miles and Roberts (1992), but with a steady flow added to the bottom layer. This configuration may represent a simple view of large-scale convection or meridional flows affecting surface MHD waves that are present at the interface of the solar interior-atmosphere. A shear flow at a tangential discontinuity can be of importance in the stability of surfaces in hydrodynamic and MHD theory. A shear flow can lead to the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability: when the shear in flow is great enough, a forward- and backward-propagating wave couple together, causing the instability (Chandrasekhar, 1961). The negative-energy wave instability (Ryutova, 1988, Ruderman and Goossens, 1995, Ruderman and Wright, 1998, Tirry *et al.*, 1998, Taroyan and Erdélyi, 2002) can occur for lower flow shears than this, however, making it an interesting area of study. This instability is intimately linked to the so-called dissipative instability (Ruderman *et al.*, 1996, Erdélyi and Taroyan, 2003), where the “negative energy” (*i.e.* energy loss) is due to some form of dissipation being present in the system.

At a tangential discontinuity the flow can affect which magnetoacoustic waves are able to propagate, as the cutoffs, determining the propagation window (*i.e.* changes from non-leaky to leaky modes), can be shifted. This was demonstrated in Nakariakov and Roberts (1995) and Terra-Homem, Erdélyi, and Ballai (2003). For a certain range of flow parameters, the fast wave in a magnetic slab could not propagate. Furthermore, in general, the phase speed of a wave propagating in the direction of the flow is increased to a small extent by the bulk motion (in comparison to the same wave in the static medium), whereas a wave propagating in the counter-flow direction would be decelerated to a much greater extent. If the flow is strong enough, then the phase speed of this latter so-called backward-propagating wave can be increased enough for the direction of its propagation to change. In terms of the stability of a tangential discontinuity, this change in direction of the propagation can be of great importance, *e.g.* leading to the phenomenon of negative-energy waves (see *e.g.* Joarder, Nakariakov, and Roberts, 1997, Terra-Homem, Erdélyi, and Ballai, 2003).

The article is set out as follows. In Section 2 the background equilibrium is outlined, along with the general governing equations and the more simplified governing equations for each layer in the model. The dispersion relation for this model is also derived by implementing the relevant boundary conditions. The incompressible and small wavelength limit are noted here. In Section 3 the cutoff curves defining the domains (*i.e.* windows) of propagation are introduced and a subsequent numerical analysis of the dispersion relation is performed. In Section 4 we conclude.

## 2 Dispersion Relation

### 2.1 Governing Equation

*i.e.*the \(z\)-axis. The plasma has kinetic pressure \(p(z)\), density \(\rho(z)\), and a steady horizontal flow along the \(x\)-axis \({\boldsymbol{u}}(z) = (u(z),0,0)\). The gravitational force points in the negative \(z\)-direction, \({\boldsymbol{g}} = (0,0,-g)\). The magnetic field points in the positive \(x\)-direction and can vary arbitrarily in the \(z\)-direction, \({\boldsymbol{B}}(z)=(B(z),0,0)\). The magnetohydrostatic balance is achieved by satisfying the condition

### 2.2 Equilibrium

We assume a single magnetic interface located at \(z=0\). The upper isothermal (with temperature \(T_{0}\)) region (\(z>0\)) is permeated by an exponentially decreasing horizontal magnetic field \(B_{0}(z)\) with the assumption that the Alfvén speed (\(v_{\mathrm{A}}\)) is constant. The field-free lower region (\(z<0\)) is also isothermal (but of a different temperature, \(T_{\mathrm{e}}\)) with a parallel constant steady flow \(u_{\mathrm{e}}\).

### 2.3 Region with Magnetic Field

### 2.4 Non-Magnetic Region with Background Flow

### 2.5 General Dispersion Relation

### 2.6 Incompressible Limit

*i.e.*\(c_{\mathrm{s0}},c_{ \mathrm{se}}\to\infty\). Therefore \(m_{\mathrm{e}}\to-k_{x}^{2} \omega^{2}/\Omega^{2}\), \(m_{0}\to-k_{x}^{2}\) and \(M_{\mathrm{e}},M _{0}\to k_{x}\). Taking the special case of uniform distributions of density, such that \(\rho_{0}(z)=\rho_{0}\) and \(\rho_{\mathrm{e}}(z)= \rho_{\mathrm{e}}\) as in Sengottuvel and Somasundaram (2001), Equation (27) reduces to the second-order polynomial for the horizontal phase speed (\(\omega/k_{x}\)):

### 2.7 Small Wavelength (\(k_{x}H_{\mathrm{e}}\to\infty\)) and Cold Plasma (\(\beta=0\)) Limit

*i.e.*\(c_{\mathrm{s0}}=0\)) limit is taken for analytic progress. This removes the slow surface mode, but the fast mode is retained. When this limit is applied, Equation (35) results in the following fourth-order polynomial in \(\Omega\):

- 1.
The limit of small flow

*i.e.*\(\widehat{u}_{\mathrm {e}}=\epsilon \), where \(\epsilon\ll1\). - 2.
A large discontinuity in density

*i.e.*\(\rho_{\mathrm{r}}= \epsilon\), where \(\epsilon\ll1\).

#### 2.7.1 Limit of Small Flow

*i.e.*\(0\leq\rho_{ \mathrm{r}}\leq1\). We therefore have a minimum value of \(\widehat{v} _{\mathrm{A}}^{2}=2/\gamma\). This is greater than one (taking the value of the adiabatic index, \(\gamma\), to be \(5/3\)), and therefore we only need to fulfil condition (2) above. We find that solutions do not exist for \(\widehat{\Omega}_{0}^{2}=1\) and that the function \(\widehat{\Omega}_{0}^{2}(\rho_{\mathrm{r}})\), from Equation (39), is continuous. If a value for \(\widehat{\Omega}_{0}^{2}\) can be found that is lower than one, then all values of \(\widehat{\Omega}_{0}^{2}\) must be lower than one. In the limit \(\rho_{\mathrm{r}}\to0\),

#### 2.7.2 Limit of Low Density Ratio

The frequency for both the backward and forward waves increases linearly with the flow, as does the frequency shift. When the density ratio is increased, the frequency shift for the backward-propagating wave is largely unaffected. However, for the forward-propagating wave, the frequency shift is slightly lowered. For a high enough flow speed the backward-propagating wave can change its direction of propagation, as shown by Figure 3, when it takes a positive value of \(\widehat{\omega}\).

## 3 Numerical Solution of the Dispersion Relation

### 3.1 Cut-off Curves

*i.e.*evanescent (non-propagating) modes in the \(z\) direction. This means that in the \(\omega\mbox{--}k_{x}\) plane these constraints (where both are fulfilled) determine those permitted regions of the \((\omega,k_{x})\) parameter space of propagation where magnetoacoustic-gravity surface modes given by Equation (26) may propagate. The boundary curves to these regions represent cut-off curves (cut-off frequencies) for the modes. Outside these regions, where either \((1 - 4 A_{B} H_{B}^{2})\) or \((1 - 4 A_{\mathrm{e}} H_{ \mathrm{e}}^{2})\) is negative, spatially oscillating leaky-modes arise in which we are not interested.

### 3.2 Numerical Results

We now examine modes resulting from the numerical solution of the dispersion relation, Equation (26). The scope of the current work is to explore the effect of increasing flow magnitude on the modes, ascending from the value of zero flow.

First of all, we recall that in the absence of gravity and flow, a magnetic interface may support one or two surface modes (depending on the relative temperatures of the media either side of the interface and on the strength of the magnetic field). These are the fast and slow magnetoacoustic (MA) surface waves (Roberts, 1981b). Whereas the slow mode is always present, the fast mode only appears when both \(v_{\mathrm{A}} > c_{\mathrm{s0}}\) (*i.e.* the magnetic field is strong enough to dominate the nature of the plasma within the magnetic region) and \(c_{\mathrm{se}} > c_{\mathrm{s0}}\) (*i.e.* the field-free region is warmer than the magnetic atmosphere). When these conditions are fulfilled, both waves have sub-Alfvénic phase-speeds (\(\omega/k_{x}\)).

In the presence of gravity, the counterparts of MA modes arise, which are called magnetoacoustic-gravity (MAG) surface modes. These are the fast and slow MA surface modes modified by the gravity. For a detailed investigation see Miles and Roberts (1992). However, when the field-free region is warmer than the magnetic medium (\(c_{\mathrm{se}} > c_{\mathrm{s0}}\)), there also appears a third mode, the *f*-mode, which is modified by the magnetic field, although for a limited range of the horizontal wavenumber. Miles and Roberts (1992) showed that as the magnetic field strength is increased, the *f*-mode develops into the fast magnetoacoustic-gravity surface mode. Furthermore, when \(v_{\mathrm{A}} > c_{\mathrm{s0}}\) is satisfied, this solution merges with the fast surface-wave solution of the non-stratified (\(g=0\)) medium at very low wavelengths (\(k_{x} H_{\mathrm{e}} \rightarrow\infty\)). On the other hand, when the magnetic medium is warmer than the field-free region (\(c_{\mathrm{s0}} > c_{\mathrm{se}}\)), the *f*-mode is replaced by a surface gravity wave.

Consider now the influence of a background equilibrium flow on the modes discussed above. We solve the dispersion relation, Equation (26), numerically and plot the dimensionless longitudinal phase speed, \(\omega/ k_{x} c_{\mathrm{se}}\), as a function of the dimensionless horizontal wavenumber, \(k_{x} H_{ \mathrm{e}}\). We set \(\gamma=5/3\) throughout.

*e.g.*in the higher parts of the penumbra). The permitted regions of propagation for surface modes (see Section 3.1) bounded by the cut-off curves \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), \(R_{3}\), \(R_{4}\), \(\pm R_{5}\), and \(\pm R_{6}\) (shown as dashed lines) are shaded grey. The dot-dashed line represents the curve \(A_{B}=0\) (see Equation (13)) and divides the region of evanescence in the upper medium (\(z>0\)) into a region (shaded dark grey) where the vertical velocity component is exponentially growing with height, \(z\), (here \(A_{B}>0\)), from a region (shaded light grey) where it decreases with height (here \(A_{B}<0\)). We note again that in the lower region, \(z<0\), the vertical velocity component always becomes smaller with height.

The dot-dashed horizontal lines in Figure 4 correspond to \(\omega=\pm k_{x} c_{\mathrm{T}}\) and the dotted horizontal lines correspond to the asymptotes to which the MAG surface modes tend as \(k_{x} H_{\mathrm{e}} \rightarrow\infty\). The limit \(k_{x} H_{ \mathrm{e}} \rightarrow\infty\) is equivalent to \(g \rightarrow0\), where the asymptotes can be determined by solving the non-gravity dispersion relation that is obtained from the dispersion relation (26) in the limit of zero gravity.

We note that with the parameters chosen as \(c_{\mathrm{s0}}/c_{ \mathrm{se}}=0.9\) and \(v_{\mathrm{A}}/c_{\mathrm{se}}=0.5\), only the slow surface mode can propagate in the zero-gravity limit and therefore for large \(k_{x} H_{\mathrm{e}}\). Thus, in Figure 4a (which corresponds to the static background case) we show that the slow MAG mode (the fast mode is absent) is only present within the light grey region (\(A_{B}<0\)). At lower wavenumbers (for a limited range of wavenumbers) the *f*-mode (modified by the magnetic field) is visible. It lies entirely within the dark grey region (\(A_{B}>0\)) and therefore has a growing vertical velocity in the upper medium (\(z>0\)).

Modes with negative phase speeds correspond to waves propagating in the opposite, backwards, direction. Here, in the static case, forward- (positive phase speed) and backward-propagating (negative phase speed) waves are symmetrical counterparts to the \(\omega/ (k_{x} c_{ \mathrm{se}})=0\) axis. In the remaining figures, we examine the effect of increasing the equilibrium flow on the symmetrical modes of the static equilibrium.

The cut-off curves \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), \(R_{3}\), \(\text{and } R_{4}\) are shifted upwards as the flow increases (see Equation (44)), but the curves \(\pm R_{5}\), \(\pm R_{6}\) (Equation (48)) and \(A_{B}=0\) (Equation (13)) do not change their position. This results in a similar upward shift of the permitted regions of wave propagation as well as in the deformation of their shape. We may observe that permitted regions may disappear together with the modes propagating in them as, for example, in Figures 4b, c where the *f*-modes vanish. New permitted regions may also appear, but it does not necessarily follow that new modes also appear (see Figure 4c, where the permitted regions bounded by the curves \(R_{1} \text{ and } R_{6}\) and \(R_{5} \text{ and } R_{4}\) appear without new modes).

The flow also modifies the frequency (and the phase speed) of the modes. However, frequency shifts of various modes may differ in magnitude. In the series of panels from Figure 4a – f, the backward-propagating slow mode shifts together with the flow and even changes its direction of propagation, thus becoming a forward-propagating (in the same direction as the flow) mode (see Figure 4c).

On the other hand, the forward-propagating slow mode mainly retains its position (*i.e.* its phase speed), while the permitted regions “pass through” it as the flow changes. The permitted region that originally contains this mode (bounded by the curves \(R_{1}\) and \(c_{\mathrm{T}}/c_{\mathrm{se}}\)) gradually disappears as the flow increases (see Figures 4a, b), and in the end, the mode is transferred to the permitted region containing the other slow mode “travelling upward” with the flow (Figure 4c).

In what follows, the slow mode with lower phase speed continuously approaches the upper slow mode as the flow increases, and finally, when the flow reaches a critical value, it couples to the upper mode. The coupled slow modes form two branches, and the gap between them continues to expand with further growing equilibrium flows (Figures 4d and e). Meanwhile, the two asymptotes to which the slow modes tend become closer until they merge with each other and cancel out, leaving behind only the lower branch of the coupled modes (Figure 4f). A further increase of the flow gradually causes this mode to disappear.

The upward shift of the permitted regions and of the modes (as a result of the increasing flow) results in the disappearance of the backward-propagating fast mode (Figure 5b). The upper permitted region containing the forward-propagating fast mode is deformed as a result of the upward shift of the curve \(R_{2}\). This causes the lower part of the mode to be transferred to a region (shaded dark grey) where the mode has a growing vertical velocity with height \(z\) (Figure 5b). Next, at higher flow values, the mode, while slowly shifting upward together with the asymptote to which it tends, can only propagate at increasing wavenumbers (as shown by their absence in the range \(0\le k_{x}H_{\mathrm{e}}\le6\) in Figures 5c and d).

The forward- and backward-propagating slow modes behave similarly to the case depicted in Figure 4. The forward propagating slow mode, whilst keeping its relatively constant position, is transferred to the permitted region containing the other slow mode (Figure 5c). Meanwhile, the backward-propagating slow mode carried away by the flow continues to shift upwards, and thus changes its direction of propagation (Figure 5c) and approaches the upper slow mode. Just before the asymptotes – to which the slow modes tend – reach each other, the slow modes couple and form two branches like in Figures 4d and e (this is not visible here). After the connection and cancellation of the asymptotes, only the lower branch of the coupled modes remains (Figure 5d), which gradually disappears as the flow increases.

As the equilibrium flow increases, the modes in the dark grey regions behave differently: the backward-propagating mode disappears, while its forward-propagating counterpart slips out from the dark grey region into the light grey region (Figure 6b) and later (at higher flow velocities) is transferred to the permitted region bounded by the cut-off curves \(R_{4}\text{ and } R_{5}\) (Figures 6c and d). The slow modes behave similarly to the previous cases: the backward-propagating slow mode shifts together with the flow (Figure 6b), changes its direction of propagation (Figure 6c), and finally reaches and couples to the forward propagating slow mode (Figure 6d). The coupled modes gradually disappear as the flow increases further.

It is of interest to deduce how the phase speed of a mode varies with the increasing flow magnitude at a specific wavenumber.

*i.e.*stratification is unimportant. From the choice of parameters the modes shown here are the same fast and slow MAG surface modes as those displayed in Figure 5. The permitted regions of propagation for surface waves are shaded grey. The \(k_{x} H_{\mathrm{e}}=\infty\) case is equivalent to the gravity-free case, and therefore Figure 7c shows the behaviour of the fast and slow MAG surface modes that correspond to the asymptotes of the modes in Figure 5.

It is visible in all three figures that as the flow starts to increase from zero, the phase speeds of all modes increase. The backward-propagating fast mode vanishes in all three cases. A forbidden gap arises, where surface modes are not allowed to propagate, bounded by the \(R_{1}\) and \(R_{4}\) cut-off curves. This causes the forward-propagating fast and slow modes to exist in two separate flow intervals below and above the gap (Figures 7a, b). However, with increasing wavenumber, the width of the gap decreases, eventually disappearing in the \(k_{x} H_{\mathrm{e}}\to\infty\) limit (Figure 7c). See Equations (54) – (56) for the asymptotic values of the cut-off curves \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), \(R_{3}\), \(R_{4}\), \(R_{5}\), \(\text{and } R_{6}\).

The phase speeds of the forward-propagating fast and slow modes clearly change little with flow speed. For lower flow velocities they increase, and for higher flow velocities they decrease with growing flow. On the other hand, the phase speed of the backward-propagating slow mode changes substantially with flow speed, being carried away by the flow (see the parts in Figure 7 where the phase speed increases together with the flow with unit slope). It is also easily observable that the backward-propagating slow mode changes the direction of propagation and couples to the other slow mode.

For flows in the negative direction, the opposite behaviour occurs. The forward-propagating slow modes are decelerated by this counter-flow and even reverse their direction of propagation. The backward-propagating fast and slow mode phase speeds are barely changed by the increase in the magnitude of the negative flow. This is due to the property of the dispersion relation (26) that it is symmetric for the Doppler shifted frequency (\(\Omega\)) in the lower layer part.

## 4 Conclusion

We study MAG surface wave propagation with the consideration of a steady uniform flow (in the horizontal \(x\)-direction) in the bottom layer of two semi-infinite plasmas under gravity described by the fully static equilibrium given in Miles and Roberts (1992). The equilibrium leads to a velocity shear, with the bottom layer in relative motion to the fixed frame of reference of the upper magnetic layer. It is found that this consideration of flow has important consequences on the propagation of MAG surface waves.

With respect to the propagation of surface waves, the flow is shown to have an effect in some distinct ways. By increasing the flow parameter \(u_{\mathrm{e}}/c_{\mathrm{se}}\) from zero upwards, the cut-offs for determining regions of surface wave propagation in the \(\omega/k_{x}\)–\(k_{x}\) plane are shifted. The disappearance of the fast wave can be accounted for by this shift, in some cases (see, *e.g.* Figure 4a). Another aspect of the consideration of bulk background flow is the change in the phase speeds of the surface waves. Figures 4–6 show that the backward-propagating solution is decelerated as the flow is increased. At a wavelength threshold, it can eventually become a forward-propagating wave in the static frame of reference. We clearly observe this behaviour in Figure 7. Here the flow is increased, with the wavenumber remaining constant, and the solutions clearly cross the axis to become forward propagating. The change in direction of propagation of the surface waves has been shown to lead to the occurrence of negative-energy waves, which may be of interest in energy transfer between waves of positive and negative energy (Ryutova 1988), resonant absorption (Ruderman and Wright 1998, Tirry *et al.*, 1998, Erdélyi and Taroyan, 2003), or explosive instabilities (Joarder, Nakariakov, and Roberts, 1997). As the flow velocity shear between the two layers is increased, eventually a point is reached where the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability appears (see *e.g.* Chandrasekhar 1961); the two wave solutions couple together. This is demonstrated in Figures 4–7, where the solutions approach one another as the flow increases, becoming complex conjugates, respectively. This means that both have the same real phase speed, but one wave has a positive imaginary part and is therefore over-stable with increasing amplitude in time, whilst the other wave has a negative imaginary part and is therefore damped over time.

Meridional flows of the interior of the Sun are very slow, up to \(0.2~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\). We take this value as \(u_{\mathrm{e}}\) and the sound speed as \(7~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\) such that \(u_{\mathrm{e}}/c_{\mathrm{se}}=0.03\) for the model proposed for Figure 4. It is clear from this value that this type of velocity shear will only have a modest effect on the propagation of MAG surface waves in the proposed model. However, this type of velocity shear is not the only possible shear for the model described in Figure 4. Velocity shears between the two layers could also be attributed to differential rotation of the Sun. If we take a high differential rotation velocity of \(2.0~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\) i.e. \(u_{\mathrm{e}}/c_{\mathrm{se}}=0.29\), then the ratio is higher, but as shown in Figure 4, the flow speed is not high enough for backward-propagating waves to reverse their direction. Therefore no negative energy waves or Kelvin–Helmholtz instability will occur.

Evershed flows in sunspots can reach up to \(6~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\). Applying this to Figure 5 and taking \(c_{\mathrm{se}}=7~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\) and \(u_{\mathrm{e}}=6~\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\) and thus \(u_{\mathrm{e}}/c_{\mathrm{se}}=0.86\), it can be seen from Figures 5 and 7 that this flow speed is high enough for the backward-propagating waves to reverse their direction of propagation. Thus some running penumbral waves (RPW) may become negative energy waves. This could also have implications for interpreting the observations of RPW, as some may have very slow phase speeds because they are backward-propagating waves.

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank E. Varga for a number of fruitful discussions taking place about a decade ago when part of the idea of this article emerged. The authors also acknowledge the support from the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC). RE is grateful to the Royal Society and to the Chinese Academy of Sciences Presidents International Fellowship Initiative, Grant No. 2016VMA045 for support received.

## Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

## References

- Erdélyi, R., Taroyan, Y.: 2003, MHD resonant flow instability in the magnetotail. In: Velli, M., Bruno, R., Malara, F., Bucci, B. (eds.)
*Solar Wind Ten*,*American Institute of Physics Conference Series***679**, 355. DOI. ADS. Google Scholar - Freij, N., Scullion, E.M., Nelson, C.J., Mumford, S., Wedemeyer, S., Erdélyi, R.: 2014, The detection of upwardly propagating waves channeling energy from the chromosphere to the low corona.
*Astrophys. J.***791**, 61. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Giovanelli, R.G.: 1972, Oscillations and waves in a sunspot.
*Solar Phys.***27**, 71. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Joarder, P.S., Nakariakov, V.M., Roberts, B.: 1997, A manifestation of negative energy waves in the solar atmosphere.
*Solar Phys.***176**, 285. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Miles, A.J., Allen, H.R., Roberts, B.: 1992, Magnetoacoustic-gravity surface waves. II – Uniform magnetic field.
*Solar Phys.***141**, 235. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Miles, A.J., Roberts, B.: 1992, Magnetoacoustic-gravity surface waves. I – Constant Alfvén speed.
*Solar Phys.***141**, 205. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nakariakov, V.M., Roberts, B.: 1995, Magnetosonic waves in structured atmospheres with steady flows, I.
*Solar Phys.***159**, 213. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Roberts, B.: 1981a, Wave propagation in a magnetically structured atmosphere – Part Two – Waves in a magnetic slab.
*Solar Phys.***69**, 39. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Roberts, B.: 1981b, Wave propagation in a magnetically structured atmosphere. I – Surface waves at a magnetic interface.
*Solar Phys.***69**, 27. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ruderman, M.S., Goossens, M.: 1995, Surface Alfvén waves of negative energy.
*J. Plasma Phys.***54**, 149. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ruderman, M.S., Wright, A.N.: 1998, Excitation of resonant Alfvén waves in the magnetosphere by negative energy surface waves on the magnetopause.
*J. Geophys. Res.***103**, 26573. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ruderman, M.S., Verwichte, E., Erdélyi, R., Goossens, M.: 1996, Dissipative instability of the MHD tangential discontinuity in magnetized plasmas with anisotropic viscosity and thermal conductivity.
*J. Plasma Phys.***56**, 285. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ryutova, M.P.: 1988, Negative energy waves in a plasma with structured magnetic fields.
*Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.***94**, 138. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar - Sengottuvel, M.P., Somasundaram, K.: 2001, Magnetoacoustic-gravity surface waves with Evershed flow – a model for running penumbral waves.
*Solar Phys.***198**, 79. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Taroyan, Y., Erdélyi, R.: 2002, Resonant and Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities on the magnetopause.
*Phys. Plasmas***9**, 3121. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Terra-Homem, M., Erdélyi, R., Ballai, I.: 2003, Linear and non-linear MHD wave propagation in steady-state magnetic cylinders.
*Solar Phys.***217**, 199. DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tirry, W.J., Cadez, V.M., Erdelyi, R., Goossens, M.: 1998, Resonant flow instability of MHD surface waves.
*Astron. Astrophys.***332**, 786. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.