Solar Physics

, Volume 291, Issue 12, pp 3793–3805 | Cite as

Dependence of the Sunspot-Group Size on the Level of Solar Activity and its Influence on the Calibration of Solar Observers

  • I. G. Usoskin
  • G. A. Kovaltsov
  • T. Chatzistergos
Article

Abstract

We study the distribution of the sunspot-group size (area) and its dependence on the level of solar activity. We show that the fraction of small groups is not constant but decreases with the level of solar activity so that high solar activity is mainly defined by large groups. We analyze the possible influence of solar activity on the ability of a realistic observer to see and report the daily number of sunspot groups. It is shown that the relation between the number of sunspot groups as seen by different observers with different observational acuity thresholds is strongly nonlinear and cannot be approximated by the traditionally used linear scaling (\(k\)-factors). The observational acuity threshold [\(A_{\mathrm{th}}\)] is considered to quantify the quality of each observer, instead of the traditional relative \(k\)-factor. A nonlinear \(c\)-factor based on \(A_{\mathrm{th}}\) is proposed, which can be used to correct each observer to the reference conditions. The method is tested on a pair of principal solar observers, Wolf and Wolfer, and it is shown that the traditional linear correction, with the constant \(k\)-factor of 1.66 to scale Wolf to Wolfer, leads to an overestimate of solar activity around solar maxima.

Keywords

Solar activity Sunspots Solar observations Solar cycle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I.G.U. and G.A.K. acknowledge support by the Academy of Finland to the ReSoLVE Center of Excellence (project No. 272157). T.C. acknowledges the postgraduate fellowship of the International Max Planck Research School on Physical Processes in the Solar System and Beyond.

Disclosure of Potential Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aparicio, A.J.P., Vaquero, J.M., Carrasco, V.M.S., Gallego, M.C.: 2014, Sunspot numbers and areas from the Madrid Astronomical observatory (1876 – 1986). Solar Phys. 289, 4335.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arlt, R., Leussu, R., Giese, N., Mursula, K., Usoskin, I.G.: 2013, Sunspot positions and sizes for 1825 – 1867 from the observations by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 433, 3165.  DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrasco, V.M.S., Vaquero, J.M., Gallego, M.C., Trigo, R.M.: 2013, Forty two years counting spots: Solar observations by D.E. Hadden during 1890 – 1931 revisited. New Astron. 25, 95.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clette, F., Svalgaard, L., Vaquero, J.M., Cliver, E.W.: 2014, Revisiting the sunspot number: A 400-year perspective on the solar cycle. Space Sci. Rev. 186, 35.  DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cliver, E.W., Ling, A.G.: 2016, The discontinuity circa 1885 in the group sunspot number. Solar Phys., in press.  DOI. ADS. Google Scholar
  6. Eddy, J.A.: 1976, The Maunder minimum. Science 192, 1189.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedli, T.: 2016a, Recalculation of the Wolf series from 1849 to 1893. Solar. Phys., submitted. Google Scholar
  8. Friedli, T.K.: 2016b, Sunspot observations of Rudolf Wolf from 1849 – 1893. Solar Phys. in press.  DOI. ADS. Google Scholar
  9. Hathaway, D.H.: 2015, The solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 12, 4.  DOI. http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2015-4. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoyt, D.V., Schatten, K.H.: 1998, Group sunspot numbers: A new solar activity reconstruction. Solar Phys. 179, 189.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang, J., Cameron, R.H., Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M.: 2011, The solar magnetic field since 1700. I. Characteristics of sunspot group emergence and reconstruction of the butterfly diagram. Astron. Astrophys. 528, A82.  DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kilcik, A., Yurchyshyn, V.B., Abramenko, V., Goode, P.R., Ozguc, A., Rozelot, J.P., Cao, W.: 2011, Time distributions of large and small sunspot groups over four solar cycles. Astrophys. J. 731, 30.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lockwood, M., Owens, M.J., Barnard, L.: 2014, Centennial variations in sunspot number, open solar flux, and streamer belt width. 1. Correction of the sunspot number record since 1874. J. Geophys. Res., Space Phys. 119, 5172.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lockwood, M., Owens, M.J., Barnard, L., Usoskin, I.G.: 2016a, Tests of sunspot number sequences: 3. Effects of regression procedures on the calibration of historic sunspot data. Solar Phys., in press.  DOI. ADS. Google Scholar
  15. Lockwood, M., Owens, M.J., Barnard, L., Usoskin, I.G.: 2016b, An assessment of sunspot number data composites over 1845 – 2014. Astrophys. J. 824(1), 54.  DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nagovitsyn, Y.A., Pevtsov, A.A., Livingston, W.C.: 2012, On a possible explanation of the long-term decrease in sunspot field strength. Astrophys. J. 758, L20.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neuhäuser, R., Arlt, R., Pfitzner, E., Richter, S.: 2015, Newly found sunspot observations by Peter Becker from Rostock for 1708, 1709, and 1710. Astron. Nachr. 336, 623.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Obridko, V.N., Badalyan, O.G.: 2014, Cyclic and secular variations sunspot groups with various scales. Astron. Rep. 58, 936.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sarychev, A.P., Roshchina, E.M.: 2009, Comparison of three solar activity indices based on sunspot observations. Solar Syst. Res. 43, 151.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sokoloff, D.: 2004, The maunder minimum and the solar dynamo. Solar Phys. 224, 145.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Svalgaard, L., Schatten, K.H.: 2016, Reconstruction of the sunspot group number: the backbone method. Solar Phys., in press.  DOI. ADS. Google Scholar
  22. Usoskin, I.G., Arlt, R., Asvestari, E., Hawkins, E., Käpylä, M., Kovaltsov, G.A., Krivova, N., Lockwood, M., Mursula, K., O’Reilly, J., Owens, M., Scott, C.J., Sokoloff, D.D., Solanki, S.K., Soon, W., Vaquero, J.M.: 2015, The Maunder minimum (1645 – 1715) was indeed a grand minimum: A reassessment of multiple datasets. Astron. Astrophys. 581, A95.  DOI. ADS. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Usoskin, I.G., Kovaltsov, G.A., Lockwood, M., Mursula, K., Owens, M., Solanki, S.K.: 2016, A new calibrated sunspot group series since 1749: Statistics of active day fractions. Solar Phys., in press.  DOI. ADS. Google Scholar
  24. Vaquero, J.M., Vázquez, M.: 2009, The Sun Recorded Through History: Scientific Data Extracted from Historical Documents, Astrophys. Space Sci. Lib. 361, Springer, Berlin. ADS. Google Scholar
  25. Vaquero, J.M., Svalgaard, L., Carrasco, V.M.S., Clette, F., Lefèvre, L., Gallego, M.C., Arlt, R., Aparicio, A.J.P., Richard, J., Howe, R.: 2016, A revised collection of sunspot group numbers. Solar Phys., in press.  DOI. ADS. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ReSoLVE, Space Climate GroupUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Sodankylä Geophysical ObservatoryUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  3. 3.Ioffe Physical-Technical InstituteSt. PetersburgRussia
  4. 4.Max-Planck-Institut für SonnensystemforschungGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations