Solar Physics

, Volume 291, Issue 9–10, pp 3081–3102 | Cite as

On-line Tools for Solar Data Compiled at the Debrecen Observatory and Their Extensions with the Greenwich Sunspot Data

Sunspot Number Recalibration

Abstract

The primary task of the Debrecen Heliophysical Observatory (DHO) has been the most detailed, reliable, and precise documentation of the solar photospheric activity since 1958. This long-term effort resulted in various solar catalogs based on ground-based and space-borne observations. A series of sunspot databases and on-line tools were compiled at DHO: the Debrecen Photoheliographic Data (DPD, 1974 –), the dataset based on the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) of the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) called SOHO/MDI-Debrecen Data (SDD, 1996 – 2010), and the dataset based on the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) of the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) called SDO/HMI–Debrecen Data (HMIDD, 2010 – ). User-friendly web-presentations and on-line tools were developed to visualize and search data. As a last step of the compilation, the revised version of Greenwich Photoheliographic Results (GPR, 1874 – 1976) catalog was converted to DPD format, and a homogeneous sunspot database covering more than 140 years was created. The database of images for the GPR era was completed with the full-disc drawings of the Hungarian historical observatories Ógyalla and Kalocsa (1872 – 1919) and with the polarity drawings of Mount Wilson Observatory. We describe the main characteristics of the available data and on-line tools.

Keywords

Sunspots Active regions Magnetic fields 

References

  1. Baranyi, T.: 2015, Comparison of Debrecen and Mount Wilson/Kodaikanal sunspot group tilt angles and the Joy’s law. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 447, 1857. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baranyi, T., Győri, L., Ludmány, A., Coffey, H.E.: 2001, Comparison of sunspot area data bases. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 323, 223. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baranyi, T., Király, S., Coffey, H.E.: 2013, Indirect comparison of Debrecen and Greenwich daily sums of sunspot areas. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 434, 1713. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clette, F., Berghmans, D., Vanlommel, P., Van der Linden, R.A.M., Koeckelenbergh, A., Wauters, L.: 2007, From the Wolf number to the International Sunspot Index: 25 years of SIDC. Adv. Space Res. 40, 919. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clette, F., Svalgaard, L., Vaquero, J.M., Cliver, E.W.: 2014, Revisiting the sunspot number. A 400-year perspective on the solar cycle. Space Sci. Rev. 186, 35. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coddington, O., Lean, J.L., Pilewskie, P., Snow, M., Lindholm, D.: 2016, A solar irradiance climate data record. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. DOI. Early Online Releases. Google Scholar
  7. Dezső, L.: 1982, Debrecen heliophysical observatory. Solar Phys. 79, 195. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dezső, L.: 1987, An account of the Greenwich photoheliographic results of 1874 – 1976 and of Debrecen’s first catalog of 1977. Publ. Debr. Heliophys. Obs., Heliogr. Ser. 1, 231. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Dezső, L., Gerlei, O., Kovács, Á.: 1987, Photoheliographic results for the year 1977. Publ. Debr. Heliophys. Obs., Heliogr. Ser. 1, 11. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Erwin, E.H., Coffey, H.E., Denig, W.F., Willis, D.M., Henwood, R., Wild, M.N.: 2013, The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874 – 1976): initial corrections to the printed publications. Solar Phys. 288, 157. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gyenge, N., Baranyi, T., Ludmány, A.: 2014, Migration and extension of solar active longitudinal zones. Solar Phys. 289, 579. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gyenge, N., Korsós, M.B., Baranyi, T., Ludmány, A.: 2015, Data base and tool for studying of active region magnetic configuration and positions of solar flares. fenyi.solarobs.unideb.hu/Flares/ [Downloaded: 1 November 2015].
  13. Gyenge, N., Ballai, I., Baranyi, T.: 2016, Statistical study of spatio-temporal distribution of precursor solar flares associated with major flares. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 459, 3532. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gyenge, N., Ludmány, A., Baranyi, T.: 2016, Active longitude and solar flare occurrences. Astrophys. J. 818, 127. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Győri, L.: 1998, Automation of area measurement of sunspots. Solar Phys. 180, 109. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Győri, L.: 2005, Automated determination of the alignment of solar images. Hvar Obs. Bull. 29, 299. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Győri, L.: 2012, Study of differences between sunspot and white light facular area data determined from SDO/HMI and SOHO/MDI observations. Solar Phys. 280, 365. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Győri, L., Baranyi, T., Muraközy, J., Ludmány, A.: 2005, Recent advances in the Debrecen sunspot catalogs. Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. 76, 981. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Győri, L., Baranyi, T., Ludmány, A.: 2011, Photospheric data programs at the Debrecen Observatory. In: Choudhary, D.P., Strassmeier, K.G. (eds.) Proc. Internat. Astron. Union 6/Symp. 273, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 403. ADS. DOI. Google Scholar
  20. Győri, L., Ludmány, A., Baranyi, T.: 2016, Comparative analysis of Debrecen sunspot catalogues. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. (submitted) Google Scholar
  21. Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., Joy, A.H.: 1919, The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys. J. 48, 153. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoyt, D.V., Schatten, K.H.: 1998, Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction. Solar Phys. 179, 189. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howard, R., Gilman, P.A., Gilman, P.I.: 1984, Rotation of the Sun measured from Mount Wilson white-light images. Astrophys. J. 283, 373. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitchatinov, L.L., Khlystova, A.I.: 2014, North-South asymmetry of solar dynamo in the current activity cycle. Astron. Lett. 40, 663. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korsós, M.B., Baranyi, T., Ludmány, A.: 2014, Pre-flare dynamics of sunspot groups. Astrophys. J. 789, 107. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, J., Ulrich, R.K.: 2012, Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles. Astrophys. J. 758, 115. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A.: 2014, Re-examining sunspot tilt angle to include anti-Hale statistics. Astrophys. J. 797, 130. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A.: 2016, Tilt angle and footpoint separation of small and large bipolar sunspot regions observed with HMI. Astrophys. J. 818, 7. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCrea, W.H.: 1975, Royal Greenwich Observatory: An Historical Review issued on the occasion of its Tercentenary. H.M. Stationery Off., London. ADS.
  30. Moon, K.R., Delouille, V., Li, J.J., De Visscher, R., Watson, F., Hero, A.O.: 2016, Image patch analysis of sunspots and active regions II. Clustering via matrix factorization. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 6, A3. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mordvinov, A.V., Pevtsov, A.A., Bertello, L., Petrie, G.J.D.: 2016, Solar-Terr. Phys. 2, 3. ADS. DOI. Google Scholar
  32. Muraközy, J., Ludmány, A.: 2012, Phase lags of solar hemispheric cycles. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 419, 3624. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muraközy, J., Baranyi, T., Ludmány, A.: 2014, Sunspot group development in high temporal resolution. Solar Phys. 289, 563. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muraközy, J., Baranyi, T., Ludmány, A.: 2016, An alternative measure of solar activity from detailed sunspot datasets. Solar Phys. DOI. Google Scholar
  35. Rothermel, H.: 1993, Images of the Sun: Warren De la Rue, George Biddell Airy and celestial photography. Br. J. Hist. Sci. 26, 137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Royal Greenwich Observatory: 1874 – 1976, Greenwich Photoheliographic Results 1874 – 1976, 91. Google Scholar
  37. Scherrer, P.H., Bogart, R.S., Bush, R.I., Hoeksema, J.T., Kosovichev, A.G., Schou, J., et al.: 1995, Solar Phys. 162, 129. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scott, R.H.: 1885, The history of the Kew Observatory. Proc. Roy. Soc. London 39, 37. ADS. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Senthamizh Pavai, V., Arlt, R., Dasi-Espuig, M., Krivova, N.A., Solanki, S.K.: 2015, Sunspot areas and tilt angles for solar cycles 7 – 10. Astron. Astrophys. 584, A73. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sokoloff, D., Khlystova, A., Abramenko, V.: 2015, Solar small-scale dynamo and polarity of sunspot groups. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 451, 1522. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sun, X., Hoeksema, J.T., Liu, Y., Zhao, J.: 2015, On polar magnetic field reversal and surface flux transport during Solar Cycle 24. Astrophys. J. 798, 114. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tóth, L., Mező, G., Gerlei, O.: 2002, Haynald Observatory photosphere observations 1880 – 1919. J. Hist. Astron. 33, 278. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vargha, M., Kolláth, Z.: 1999, The first century of Konkoly Observatory. Astron. Geophys. 40, 17. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang, Y.-M., Colaninno, R.C., Baranyi, T., Li, J.: 2015, Active-region tilt angles: magnetic versus white-light determinations of Joy’s law. Astrophys. J. 798, 50. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, M.E.W.: 1987, Astronomy in London: 1860 – 1900. Quart. J. Roy. Astron. 28, 10. ADS. ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. Willis, D.M., Coffey, H.E., Henwood, R., Erwin, E.H., Hoyt, D.V., Wild, M.N., Denig, W.F.: 2013a, The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874 – 1976): summary of the observations, applications, datasets, definitions and errors. Solar Phys. 288, 117. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Willis, D.M., Henwood, R., Wild, M.N., Coffey, H.E., Denig, W.F., Erwin, E.H., Hoyt, D.V.: 2013b, The Greenwich photo-heliographic results (1874 – 1976): procedures for checking and correcting the sunspot digital datasets. Solar Phys. 288, 141. ADS. DOI. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Willis, D.M., Wild, M.N., Appleby, G.M., Macdonald, G.M.: 2016, The Greenwich Photo-heliographic Results (1874 – 1885): Observing Telescopes, Photographic Processes, and Solar Images. Solar Phys. DOI.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heliophysical Observatory, Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth SciencesHungarian Academy of SciencesDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations