# Critical Analysis of a Hypothesis of the Planetary Tidal Influence on Solar Activity

- 264 Downloads
- 14 Citations

## Abstract

The present work is a critical revision of the hypothesis of the planetary tidal influence on solar activity published by Abreu *et al.* (*Astron. Astrophys.* **548**, A88, 2012; called A12 here). A12 describes the hypothesis that planets can have an impact on the solar tachocline and therefore on solar activity. We checked the procedure and results of A12, namely the algorithm of planetary tidal torque calculation and the wavelet coherence between torque and heliospheric modulation potential. We found that the claimed peaks in long-period range of the torque spectrum are artefacts caused by the calculation algorithm (*viz.* aliasing effect). Also the statistical significance of the results of the wavelet coherence is found to be overestimated by an incorrect choice of the background assumption of red noise. Using a more conservative non-parametric random-phase method, we found that the long-period coherence between planetary torque and heliospheric modulation potential becomes insignificant. Thus we conclude that the considered hypothesis of planetary tidal influence on solar activity is not based on a solid ground.

## Keywords

Planetary influence Solar activity Tidal forces## Notes

### Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Jose Abreu and Jürg Beer for providing the original data, details of the algorithm of planetary torque computation and for the stimulating discussion.

## References

- Abreu, J.A., Beer, J., Ferriz-Mas, A., McCracken, K.G., Steinhilber, F.: 2012, Is there a planetary influence on solar activity?
*Astron. Astrophys.***548**, A88 (A12). 10.1051/0004-6361/201219997. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bigg, E.K.: 1967, Influence of the planet Mercury on sunspots.
*Astron. J.***72**, 463 – 466. 10.1086/110250. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Charbonneau, P.: 2010, Dynamo models of the solar cycle.
*Living Rev. Solar Phys.***7**(3). http://www.livingreviews.org/lrsp-2010-3. - Charbonneau, P.: 2013, Solar physics: The planetary hypothesis revived.
*Nature***493**, 613 – 614. 10.1038/493613a. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ebisuzaki, W.: 1997, A method to estimate the statistical significance of a correlation when the data are serially correlated.
*J. Climate***10**, 2147 – 2153. 10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<2147:AMTETS>2.0.CO;2. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Grinsted, A., Moore, J.C., Jevrejeva, S.: 2004, Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series.
*Nonlinear Proc. Geophys.***11**, 561 – 566. 10.5194/npg-11-561-2004. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jose, P.: 1965, Sun’s motion and sunspots.
*Astron. J.***70**, 193 – 200. 10.1086-109714. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lyons, R.: 2001,
*Understanding Digital Signal Processing*, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, 23 – 29. Google Scholar - Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J.A., Beer, J., Brunner, I., Christl, M., Fisher, H., Heikkilä, U., Kubik, P.W., Mann, M., McCracken, K.G., Miller, H., Miyahara, H., Oerter, H., Wilhelms, F.: 2012, 9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and tree rings.
*Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA***109**, 5967 – 5971. 10.1073/pnas.1118965109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sugihara, G., May, R., Ye, H., Hsieh, C.-h., Deyle, E., Fogarty, M., Munch, S.: 2012, Detecting causality in complex ecosystems.
*Science***338**, 496 – 500. 10.1126/science.1227079. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Usoskin, I.G., Alanko-Huotari, K., Kovaltsov, G.A., Mursula, K.: 2005, Heliospheric modulation of cosmic rays: Monthly reconstruction for 1951 – 2004.
*J. Geophys. Res.***110**, A12108. 10.1029/2005JA011250. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Usoskin, I.G., Voiculescu, M., Kovaltsov, G.A., Mursula, K.: 2006, Correlation between clouds at different altitudes and solar activity: Fact or artifact?
*J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys.***68**, 2164 – 2172. 10.1016/j.jastp.2006.08.005. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar