Solar Physics

, Volume 269, Issue 2, pp 451–454

Hysteresis of Cosmic Rays with Respect to Sunspot Numbers During the Recent Sunspot Minimum



Cosmic ray neutron monitors show intensity changes (counts) anti-correlated with sunspot number Rz, but with a lag of a few months. The lag is ∼ 3 months for even cycles and ∼ 9 – 15 months for odd cycles. Thus, for the recently started even Cycle 24, a lag of ∼ 3 months was expected. However, for Cycle 24, whereas Rz had a minimum value (zero) in August 2009, cosmic ray intensity decreased only after March 2010, with a lag of seven months with respect to Rz. Thus, Cycle 24 did not conform to the known pattern of even cycles (lag of ∼ 3 months). It may be noted that the minimum at the juncture of Cycle 23-24 was abnormally long, tens of months instead of few months as in earlier cycles. Also, in this solar minimum, the cosmic ray intensity was much higher than in previous cycles.


Cosmic rays Hysteresis Cycle 24 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Burlaga, L.F., McDonald, F.B., Goldstein, M.N., Lazarus, A.J.: 1985, J. Geophys. Res. 90, 12027. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burlaga, L.F., McDonald, F.B., Ness, N.F.: 1993, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 1. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dorman, L.I.: 1959, In: Proc. 6th Int. Cosmic Ray Conf., Moscow 4, Springer, Berlin, 328. Google Scholar
  4. Dorman, L.I.: 2001, Adv. Space Res. 27, 601. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorman, L.I., Iucci, N., Villoresi, G.: 2001, Adv. Space Res. 27, 589. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dorman, L.I., Dorman, I.V., Iucci, N., Parisi, M., Villoresi, G.: 2001, Adv. Space Res. 27, 589. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jokipii, J.R., Davila, J.M.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, 1156. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jokipii, J.R., Thomas, B.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 243, 1115. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kane, R.P.: 2007, Ann. Geophys. 25, 2087. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee, M.A., Fisk, L.A.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, 836. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mavromichalaki, H., Paouris, E., Karalidi, T.: 2007, Solar Phys. 245, 369. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Parker, E.N.: 1963, Interplanetary Dynamical Processes, Interscience, New York. MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Potgieter, M.S., Moraal, H.: 1985, Astrophys. J. 294, 425. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wibberenz, G., Richardson, I.G., Cane, H.V.: 2002, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1353. doi:10.1029/2002JA009461, SSH 5, 1–15, 2002. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – INPESão José dos CamposBrazil

Personalised recommendations