Solar Physics

, Volume 258, Issue 2, pp 319–330 | Cite as

The Shape of The Sunspot Cycle: A One-Parameter Fit

  • D. M. VolobuevEmail author


The empirical description of the shape of the sunspot cycle is one of the oldest problems of solar physics. Here we show that an accurate two-parameter fit is achievable where the parameters are correlated (r=0.88) for 23 solar cycles. The correlation between the parameters of our fit provides the possibility of a one-parameter fit if the times of the minima are known a priori. A one-parameter fit can also be derived from truncated dynamo models, but the goodness of the fit is not better than as achieved for the empirical fit. We suggest that the goodness of a one-parameter fit can serve as a criterion to compare different dynamo models. A one-parameter fit provides the possibility to forecast the shape of the coming cycle via a forecast of one parameter which changes synchronously with the secular variation. A previous estimation of the coming decadal average sunspot number is converted into the forecast of the shape of the 24th cycle with a maximum of 118±26 W. The accuracy is limited mostly by the uncertainties of the predicted secular variation and the uncertainty of the time of the minimum.


Solar cycle Forecast Dynamo 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bhatt, N.J., Jain, R., Aggarwal, M.: 2009, J. Astrophys. Astron. 30, 71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Meyer, F.: 2003, Solar Phys. 217, 349. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Dikpati, M., de Toma, G., Gilman, P.A.: 2006, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L05102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elling, W., Schwentek, H.: 1992, Solar Phys. 137, 155. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., Reichmann, E.J.: 1994, Solar Phys. 151, 177. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoyt, D.V., Schatten, K.H.: 1996, Solar Phys. 165, 181. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Kane, R.P.: 2007, Solar Phys. 243, 205. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitchatinov, L.L., Pipin, V.V., Makarov, V.I., Tlatov, A.G.: 1999, Solar Phys. 189, 227. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Mininni, P.D., Gomez, D.O., Mindlin, G.B.: 2001, Solar Phys. 201, 203. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Pesnell, W.D.: 2008, Solar Phys. 252, 209. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Sabarinath, A., Anilkumar, A.K.: 2008, Solar Phys. 250, 183. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Solanki, S.K., Usoskin, I.G., Kromer, B., Schüssler, M., Beer, J.: 2004, Nature 431, 1084. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Stewart, J.Q., Panofsky, A.A.: 1938, Astrophys. J. 4, 385. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Svalgaard, L., Cliver, E.W., Kamide, Y.: 2005, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L01104. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Volobuev, D.: 2006, Solar Phys. 238, 421. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Volobuev, D.M., Makarenko, N.G.: 2008, Solar Phys. 249, 121. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Waldmeier, M.: 1935, Astron. Mitt. 133, 105. Google Scholar
  18. Wilson, R.M.: 1987, Solar Phys. 111, 255. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pulkovo ObservatorySt.-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations