Advertisement

Solar Physics

, Volume 252, Issue 1, pp 121–137 | Cite as

Multiresolution Analysis of Active Region Magnetic Structure and its Correlation with the Mount Wilson Classification and Flaring Activity

  • J. Ireland
  • C. A. Young
  • R. T. J. McAteer
  • C. Whelan
  • R. J. Hewett
  • P. T. Gallagher
Article

Abstract

Two different multiresolution analyses are used to decompose the structure of active-region magnetic flux into concentrations of different size scales. Lines separating these opposite polarity regions of flux at each size scale are found. These lines are used as a mask on a map of the magnetic field gradient to sample the local gradient between opposite polarity regions of given scale sizes. It is shown that the maximum, average, and standard deviation of the magnetic flux gradient for α,β,β γ, and β γ δ active-regions increase in the order listed, and that the order is maintained over all length scales. Since magnetic flux gradient is strongly linked to active-region activity, such as flares, this study demonstrates that, on average, the Mt. Wilson classification encodes the notion of activity over all length scales in the active-region, and not just those length scales at which the strongest flux gradients are found. Further, it is also shown that the average gradients in the field, and the average length-scale at which they occur, also increase in the same order. Finally, there are significant differences in the gradient distribution, between flaring and non-flaring active regions, which are maintained over all length scales. It is also shown that the average gradient content of active-regions that have large flares (GOES class “M” and above) is larger than that for active regions containing flares of all flare sizes; this difference is also maintained at all length scales. All of the reported results are independent of the multiresolution transform used. The implications for the Mt. Wilson classification of active-regions in relation to the multiresolution gradient content and flaring activity are discussed.

Keywords

Sun: active region Sun: magnetic field 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramenko, V.I.: 2005, Multifractal analysis of solar magnetograms. Solar Phys. 228, 29 – 42. doi: 10.1007/s11207-005-3525-9. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramenko, V.I., Yurchyshyn, V.B., Wang, H., Spirock, T.J., Goode, P.R.: 2002, Scaling behavior of structure functions of the longitudinal magnetic field in active regions on the sun. Astrophys. J. 577, 487 – 495. doi: 10.1086/342169. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, R.J.: 1989, Statistics: A Guide to the Use of Statistical Methods in the Physical Sciences, Wiley, New York. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bratsolis, E., Sigelle, M.: 1998, Solar image segmentation by use of mean field fast annealing. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 131, 371 – 375. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Conlon, P.A., Gallagher, P.T., McAteer, R.T.J., Ireland, J., Young, C.A., Kestener, P., Hewett, R.J., Maguire, K.: 2008, Multifractal properties of evolving active regions. Solar Phys. 248, 297 – 309. doi: 10.1007/s11207-007-9074-7. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui, Y., Li, R., Zhang, L., He, Y., Wang, H.: 2006, Correlation between solar flare productivity and photospheric magnetic field properties 1. Maximum horizontal gradient, length of neutral line, number of singular points. Solar Phys. 237, 45 – 659. doi: 10.1007/s11207-006-0077-6. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. De Moortel, I., Munday, S.A., Hood, A.W.: 2004, Wavelet analysis: The effect of varying basic wavelet parameters. Solar Phys. 222, 203 – 228. doi: 10.1023/B:SOLA.0000043578.01201.2d. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Domingo, V., Fleck, B., Poland, A.I.: 1995, The SOHO mission: An overview. Solar Phys. 162, 1 – 37. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Dudok de Wit, T.: 2006, Fast segmentation of solar extreme ultraviolet images. Solar Phys. 239, 519 – 530. doi: 10.1007/s11207-006-0140-3. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Falconer, D.A., Moore, R.L., Gary, G.A.: 2002, Correlation of the coronal mass ejection productivity of solar active regions with measures of their global nonpotentiality from vector magnetograms: Baseline results. Astrophys. J. 569, 1016 – 1025. doi: 10.1086/339161. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Falconer, D.A., Moore, R.L., Gary, G.A.: 2006, Magnetic causes of solar coronal mass ejections: Dominance of the free magnetic energy over the magnetic twist alone. Astrophys. J. 644, 1258 – 1272. doi: 10.1086/503699. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Falconer, D.A., Moore, R.L., Porter, J.G., Gary, G.A., Shimizu, T.: 1997, Neutral-line magnetic shear and enhanced coronal heating in solar active regions. Astrophys. J. 482, 519 – 534. doi: 10.1086/304114. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallagher, P.T., Moon, Y.J., Wang, H.: 2002, Active-region monitoring and flare forecasting I. Data processing and first results. Solar Phys. 209, 171 – 183. doi: 10.1023/A:1020950221179. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Georgoulis, M.K.: 2005, Turbulence in the solar atmosphere: Manifestations and diagnostics via solar image processing. Solar Phys. 228, 5 – 27. doi: 10.1007/s11207-005-2513-4. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: 2001, Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston. ISBN 0201180758. Google Scholar
  16. Hewett, R.J., Gallagher, P.T., McAteer, R.T.J., Young, C.A., Ireland, J., Conlon, P.A., Maguire, K.: 2008, Multiscale analysis of active region evolution. Solar Phys. 248, 311 – 322. doi: 10.1007/s11207-007-9028-0. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Keeping, E.S.: 1995, Introduction to Statistical Inference, Dover International, New York (first published 1962). Google Scholar
  18. Lawrence, J.K., Ruzmaikin, A.A., Cadavid, A.C.: 1993, Multifractal measure of the solar magnetic field. Astrophys. J. 417, 805 – 811. doi: 10.1086/173360. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawrence, J.K., Cadavid, A.C., Ruzmaikin, A.A.: 1996, On the multifractal distribution of solar magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 465, 425 – 435. doi: 10.1086/177430. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Leka, K.D., Barnes, G.: 2003a, Photospheric magnetic field properties of flaring versus flare-quiet active regions. I. Data, general approach, and sample results. Astrophys. J. 595, 1277 – 1295. doi: 10.1086/377511. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Leka, K.D., Barnes, G.: 2003b, Photospheric magnetic field properties of flaring versus flare-quiet active regions. II. Discriminant analysis. Astrophys. J. 595, 1296 – 1306. doi: 10.1086/377512. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Leka, K.D., Barnes, G.: 2007, Photospheric magnetic field properties of flaring versus flare-quiet active regions. IV. A statistically significant sample. Astrophys. J. 656, 1173 – 1186. doi: 10.1086/510282. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. McAteer, R.T.J., Gallagher, P.T., Ireland, J.: 2005, Statistics of active region complexity: A large-scale fractal dimension survey. Astrophys. J. 631, 628 – 635. doi: 10.1086/432412. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. McAteer, R.T.J., Gallagher, P.T., Ireland, J., Young, C.A.: 2005, Automated boundary-extraction and region-growing techniques applied to solar magnetograms. Solar Phys. 228, 55 – 66. doi: 10.1007/s11207-005-4075-x. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. McIntosh, P.S.: 1990, The classification of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 125, 251 – 267. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Scherrer, P.H., Bogart, R.S., Bush, R.I., Hoeksema, J.T., Kosovichev, A.G., Schou, J., Rosenberg, W., Springer, L., Tarbell, T.D., Title, A., Wolfson, C.J., Zayer, I., MDI Engineering Team: 1995, The solar oscillations investigation – Michelson Doppler imager. Solar Phys. 162, 129 – 188. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Schrijver, C.J.: 2007, A characteristic magnetic field pattern associated with all major solar flares and its use in flare forecasting. Astrophys. J. 655, L117 – L120. doi: 10.1086/511857. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Starck, J.L., Murtagh, F., Bijaoui, A.: 1998, Image Processing and Data Analysis. The Multiscale Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN: 0521590841. Google Scholar
  29. Turmon, M., Pap, J.M., Mukhtar, S.: 2002, Statistical pattern recognition for labeling solar active regions: Application to SOHO/MDI imagery. Astrophys. J. 568, 396 – 407. doi: 10.1086/338681. CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Wall, J.V., Jenkins, C.R.: 2003, Practical Statistics for Astronomers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar
  31. Wasserman, L.: 2004, All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference, Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer, New York. ISBN 0387402721. zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Ireland
    • 1
  • C. A. Young
    • 1
  • R. T. J. McAteer
    • 2
  • C. Whelan
    • 3
  • R. J. Hewett
    • 4
  • P. T. Gallagher
    • 5
  1. 1.ADNET Systems, Inc., NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight CenterGreenbeltUSA
  2. 2.Catholic University of America, NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA
  3. 3.School of PhysicsUniversity College DublinDublin 4Ireland
  4. 4.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  5. 5.Astrophysics Research Group, School of PhysicsTrinity College DublinDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations