Re-Evaluation of the Flare–Type II–CME Association
- 57 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
We have re-evaluated the association of type II solar radio bursts with flares and/or coronal mass ejections (CMEs) using the year 2000 solar maximum data. For this, we consider 52 type II events whose associations with flares or CMEs were absent or not clearly identified and reported. These events are classified as follows; group I: 11 type IIs for which there are no reports of GOES X-ray flares and CMEs; group II: 12 type IIs for which there are no reports of GOES X-ray flares; and group III: 29 type IIs for which the flare locations are not reported. By carefully re-examining their association from GOES X-ray and Hα, Yohkoh SXT and EIT-EUV data, we attempt to answer the following questions: (i) if there really were no X-ray flares associated with the above 23 type IIs of groups I and II; (ii) whether they can be regarded as backside events whose X-ray emission might have been occulted. From this analysis, we have found that two factors, flare background intensity and flare location, play important roles in the complete reports about flare–type II–CME associations. In the above 23 cases, for more than 50% of the cases in total, the X-ray flares were not noticed and reported, because the background intensity of X-ray flux was high. In the remaining cases, the X-ray intensity might be greatly reduced due to occultation. From the Hα flare data, Yohkoh SXT data and EIT-EUV data, we found that ten cases out of 23 might be frontside events, and the remaining are backside events. While the flare–type II association is found to be nearly 90%, the type II–CME association is roughly around 75%. This analysis might be useful to reduce some ambiguities regarding the association among type IIs, flares and CMEs.
Keywords
Flare Coronal Mass Ejection Radio Burst Solar Maximum Background IntensityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Andrews, M. D.: 2001, Solar Phys. 204, 181.Google Scholar
- Andrews, M. D.: 2002, Solar Phys. 208, 317.Google Scholar
- Chertok, I. M., Fomichev, V. V., Gorgutsa, R. V., Markeev, A. K., and Podstrigach, T. S.: 1990, Astron. Nachr. 311, 55.Google Scholar
- Chertok, I. M., Fomichev, V. V., Gnezdilov, A. A., Gorgutsa, R. V., Grechnev, V. V., Markeev, A. K., Nightingale, R. W., and Sobolev, D. E.: 2001, Solar Phys. 204, 139.Google Scholar
- Classen, H. T. and Aurass, H.: 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 384, 1098.Google Scholar
- Cliver, E. W., and Hudson, H. S.: 2002, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 64, 231.Google Scholar
- Cliver, E. W., Webb, D. F., and Howard, R. A.: 1999, Solar Phys. 187, 89.Google Scholar
- Dryer, M.: 1994, Space Sci. Rev. 67, 363.Google Scholar
- Dryer, M.: 1996, Solar Phys. 169, 421.Google Scholar
- Dryer, M., Fry, C. D., Sun, W., Deehr, C., Smith, Z., Akasofu, S.-I., and Andrews, M. D.: 2001, Solar Phys. 204, 265.Google Scholar
- Gopalswamy, N.: 2000, in R. G. Stone et al. (eds.), AGU Monograph 119, American Geophysical Union, Washinton, D. C., p. 123.Google Scholar
- Gopalswamy, N., Kaiser, M. L., Lepping, R. P., Kahler, S. W., Ogilvie, K., Berdichevksy, D., Kondo, T., Isobe, T., and Akioka, M.: 1998, J. Geophys. Res. A1, 103, 307.Google Scholar
- Gopalswamy, N., Kaiser, M. L., Lepping, R. P., Kahler, S. W., Ogilvie, K., Berdichevksy, D., Kondo, T., Isobe, T., and Akioka, M.: 1999, J. Geophys. Res. A3 104, 4749.Google Scholar
- Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Lara, A., Kaiser, M. L., Thompson, B. J., Gallagher, P. T., and Howard, R. A.: 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 8015.Google Scholar
- Gosling, J. T.: 1993, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 18937.Google Scholar
- Hudson, H. S., Lin, R. P., and Stewart, R. T.: 1982, Solar Phys. 75, 245.Google Scholar
- Hudson, H. S., Kosugi, T., Nitta, N. V., and Shimojo, M.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 561, L211.Google Scholar
- Lara, A., Gopalswamy, N., Nunes, S., Muoz, G. and Yashiro, S.: 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 8016, doi:10.1029/2002GL016481.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, D.: 1975, Solar. Phys. 40, 183.Google Scholar
- Nelson, G. J. and Melrose, D. B.: 1985, in D. J. McLean and N. R. Labrum (eds.), Solar Radiophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 350.Google Scholar
- Reiner, M. J., Kaiser, M. L., Karlický, M., Jiřička, K., and Bougeret, J. L.: 2001, Solar Phys. 204, 123.Google Scholar
- Shanmugaraju, A., Moon, Y.-J., Dryer, M., and Umapathy, S.: 2003a, Solar Phys. 215, 161.Google Scholar
- Shanmugaraju, A., Moon, Y.-J., Dryer, M., and Umapathy, S.: 2003b, Solar Phys. 217, 301.Google Scholar
- švestka, Z.: 2001, Space Sci. Rev. 95, 135.Google Scholar
- Vršnak, B., Ruždjak, V., Zlobec, P., and Aurass, H.: 1995, Solar Phys. 158, 331.Google Scholar
- Vršnak, B.: 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 25291.Google Scholar
- Vršnak, B., Magdalenic, J., and Aurass, H.: 2001, Solar Phys. 202, 319.Google Scholar
- Vršnak, B., Aurass, H., Magdalenic, J., and Gopalswamy, N.: 2001, Astron. Astrophys. 377, 321.Google Scholar
- Vršnak, B., Magdalenic, J., Aurass, H., and Mann, G.: 2002, Astron. Astrophys. 396, 673.Google Scholar
- Watari, S.-I. et al.: 2001, Solar Phys. 204, 423.Google Scholar
- Webb, D. F., Cliver, E. W., Gopalswamy, N., Hudson, H. S., and St. Cyr, O. C.: 1998, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2469.Google Scholar
- Wild, J. P., Smerd, J. F., and Weiss, A. A.: 1963, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1, 291.Google Scholar