Sociological Forum

, 21:55 | Cite as

Home Ownership, Social Insurance, and the Welfare State


Home ownership has potentially significant consequences for welfare state policy. High owner-occupancy rates may function as private insurance where social spending is low (a substitution effect). Alternatively, state income redistribution policies could raise the number of home owners (an income effect). Cross-national time-series data show that social spending is negatively related to home ownership, and mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and owner-occupancy rates. This suggests that owner-occupancy acts as a form of social insurance over the life course. Future welfare state researchers should consider the issue of home ownership in analyses of inequality and the social safety net.

Key Words

home ownership welfare income policy 


  1. Amenta, Edwin , and Jane D. Poulsen1996“Social politics in context: The institutional politics theory and social spending at the end of the New Deal.” Social Forces 75:33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, Peter1986The Capitalist Revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bernardi, Fabrizio , and Teresio Poggio2004“Home ownership and social inequality in Italy.” In Karin Kurz and Hans-Peter Blossfeld (eds.), Home Ownership and Social Inequality in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bullock, N.1991“Comparing European past with third world present.” In Gulsun Saglamer and A. Sule Ozuekren (eds.), Housing for the Urban Poor. ENHR International Symposium. Istanbul Technical University.Google Scholar
  5. Castles, Francis1998“The really big trade-off: Home ownership and the welfare state in the new world and the old.” Acta Politica 33:5–19.Google Scholar
  6. Chiuri, Maria Concetta , and Tullio Jappelli2000a“Financial markets, judicial costs and housing tenure: An international comparison.” Working paper. Department of Economics. Università di Bari.Google Scholar
  7. Chiuri, Maria Concetta , and Tullio Jappelli2000b“Financial markets and home ownership: A comparative study.” Working paper #44. Centro Studi in Economia e Finanza.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, Christopher D. , and Andrew A. Samwick1997“The nature of precautionary wealth.” Journal of Monetary Economics 40:41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cauthen, Nancy K. , and Edwin Amenta1996“Not for widows only: Institutional politics and the formative years of Aid to Dependent Children.” American Sociological Review 61:427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conley, Dalton C.1999Being Black, Living in the Red: Race, Wealth, and Social Policy in America. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, Robert1982Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Daunton, Martin J.1987A Property-Owning Democracy? Housing in Britain. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  13. Doling, John1997Comparative Housing Policy: Government and Housing in Advanced Industrialized Countries. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  14. Engels, Friedrich1969The Condition of the Working Class in England. St. Albans: Panther.Google Scholar
  15. Esping-Andersen, Gosta1985Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Esping-Andersen, Gosta1990The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, Peter , and John Stephens1988“Development and the world economy.” In Neil E. Smelser (ed.), The Handbook of Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Geurts, Veerle , and Luc Goossens2004“Home ownership and social inequality in Belgium.” In Karin Kurz and Hans-Peter Blossfeld (eds.), Home Ownership and Social Inequality in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Goodin, Robert E., Bruce Headey, Ruud. Muffels , and Henk-Jan Dirven1999The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hausman, Jerry1978“Specification tests in econometrics.” Econometrica 46:1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henderschott, Patric H. , and Michael White2000“The rise and fall of housing’s favored investment status.” Journal of Housing Research 11(2):257–275.Google Scholar
  22. John C. Henretta1984“Parental status and child’s home ownership.” American Sociological Review 49:131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heston, Alan, Robert Summers , and Bettina Aten2002Penn World Table Version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons (CICUP), University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  24. Hicks, Alexander1999Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hicks, Alexander , and Lane Kenworthy1998“Cooperative institutions and political economic performance in affluent capitalism.” American Journal of Sociology 103:1632–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hicks, Alexander , and Joya Misra1993“Political resources and the expansion of the welfare effort.” American Journal of Sociology 99:668–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hicks, Alexander, Joya Misra , and Tang Nah Ng1995“The programmatic emergence of the welfare state.” American Sociological Review 60:329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hicks, Alexander , and Duane Swank1984a“On the political economy of welfare expansion: A comparative analysis of 18 advanced capitalist democracies, 1960–1971.” Comparative Political Studies 17:81–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hicks, Alexander , and Duane Swank1984b“Governmental redistribution in rich capitalist democracies.” Policy Studies Journal 13:265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hicks, Alexander , and Duane Swank1992“Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrial democracies, 1960–1982.” American Political Science Review 86:658–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard, Christopher1997The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin , and John D. Stephens1993“Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state.” American Journal of Sociology 99:711–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin , and John D. Stephens1997Comparative Welfare States Data Set. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University and the University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  34. International Labour Office  Various Years The Cost of Social Security. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  35. International Monetary Fund1996International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  36. Joint Center for Housing Studies1997The State of the Nation’s Housing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  37. Kemeny, Jim1980“The political economy of housing.” In Edward L. Wheelwright and Ken Buckley (eds.), Essays in the Political Economy of Australian Capitalism, Vol. 4. Sydney: Australia and New Zealand Book Company.Google Scholar
  38. Kemeny, Jim1981The Myth of Home Ownership. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Kemeny, Jim1992Housing and Social Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Kennedy, Neale , and Palle Anderson1994“Household saving and real house prices: An international perspective.” Bank for International Settlements, Working Paper No. 20.Google Scholar
  41. Kleinbaum, David G., Lawrence J. Kuiper , and Keith G. Muller1988Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods. Belmont, CA: Duxberry.Google Scholar
  42. Kleinman, Mark1996Housing, Welfare and the State in Europe. Cheltenhan, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  43. Korpi, Walter , and Joakim Palme1998“The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries.” American Sociological Review 63:661–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kurz, Karin2004“Home ownership and social inequality in West Germany.” In Karin Kurz and Hans-Peter Blossfeld (eds.), Home Ownership and Social Inequality in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kurz, Karin , and Hans-Peter Blossfeld (eds.)2004Home Ownership and Social Inequality in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lukes, Steven1974Power: A Radical View. London: MacMillan Books.Google Scholar
  47. McCrate, Elaine1997“Welfare and women’s earnings.” Politics and Society 25:417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGuire, Chester C.1981International Housing Policies: A Comparative Analysis. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  49. Mulder, Clara H.2004“Home ownership and social inequality in the Netherlands.” In Karin Kurz and Hans-Peter Blossfeld (eds.), Home Ownership and Social Inequality in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Oliver, Melvin L. , and Thomas M. Shapiro1995Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)2001Social Expenditures Database. CD-ROM Version, 3rd edn.Google Scholar
  52. Oswald, Andrew J.1999“The housing market and Europe’s unemployment: A non-technical paper.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  53. Pahl, Ray1975Whose City? 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.Google Scholar
  54. Pampel, Fred C. , and John B. Williamson1993“Welfare spending in advanced industrial democracies, 1950–1980.” American Journal Sociology 99:1424–1456.Google Scholar
  55. Pooley, Colin G. (ed.)1992Housing Strategies in Europe: 1880–1930. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ramsey, James B.1969“Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 71:389–390.Google Scholar
  57. Rex, John1968“The sociology of a zone of transition.” In Ray Pahl (ed.), Readings in Urban Sociology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  58. Saunders, Peter1990A Nation of Home Owners. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  59. Saunders, Peter1992“Domestic property and social class.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2:233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmidt, S.1989“Convergence theory, labour movements, and corporatism: The case of housing.” Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 6:83–101.Google Scholar
  61. Scholten, Ulrich1999“The Euro and Owner-Occupancy Rates in Europe.” Working Paper, Center for Economic Studies, University of Munich.Google Scholar
  62. Sherradan, Michael1991Assets and the Poor: A New American Welfare Policy. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  63. Skocpol, Theda1985“Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research.” In Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Skocpol, Theda , and Edwin Amenta1986“States and social policies.” Annual Review of Sociology 12:131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smeeding, Timothy, P. Saunders, J. Coder, S. Jenkins, J. Fontall, A. Hagenaars, R. Hauser , and M. Wolfson1993“Poverty, inequality, and family living standards impacts across seven nations: The effect of noncash subsidies for health, education and housing.” Review of Income and Wealth 39:229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stephens, John D.1979The Transformation from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Swank, Duane1982“Between incrementalism and revolution: Group protest and the growth of the welfare state.” American Behavioral Scientist 26:291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Szelenyi, Ivan1983Urban Inequalities under State Socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Tombeur, Caroline de (ed.)1997LIS/LES Information Guide. Working Paper No. 7. Luxembourg Income Study, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  70. Torgersen, Ulf1987“Housing: The wobbly pillar under the welfare state.” In Bengt Turner, Jim Kemeny, and Lennart J. Lundquist (eds.), Between State and Market: Housing in the Postindustrial Era. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
  71. Wilensky, Harold L.1975The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditure. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wilensky, Harold L.1976The “New Corporatism”: Centralization and the Welfare State. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Wolff, Edward1990“Wealth holdings and poverty status in the U.S.” Review of Income and Wealth 36:143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wolff, Edward1996“International comparisons of wealth inequality.” Review of Income and Wealth 42:433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. World Bank Group2000World Development Indicators 2000. Country at a Glance Online Data, countrydata/countrydata.html.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Social Science Research, New York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations