Sociological Forum

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 209–244 | Cite as

Kuznets’s Inverted U-Curve Hypothesis: The Rise, Demise, and Continued Relevance of a Socioeconomic Law

Article
  • 161 Downloads

Abstract

This paper provides a historical analysis of the changing significance of the most influential statement ever made on inequality and development—Simon Kuznets’s “inverted U-curve hypothesis.” The shifting interpretations and appropriations of the hypothesis over time—from its status as a speculative supposition in 1955, to its rise and fall as a reified socioeconomic law, to its contested standing in the social sciences today—demonstrate how Kuznets’s arguments, originally advanced under more limited conditions, became transformed into overarching theoretical, empirical, and political constructions. This history suggests that even empirically grounded and testable social science models are contingent on the broader social and political contexts in which they are produced and negotiated.

Key Words

Kuznets’s U-curve income inequality development comparative theory social scientific knowledge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelman, Irma, and Cynthia Taft Morris 1973Economic Growth and Social Equity in Developing Countries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 1978“Growth and impoverishment in the middle of the nineteenth century.” World Development 6:245– 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adelman, Irma, and Sherman Robinson 1989“Income distribution and development.” In Hollis Chenery and T. N. Srinivasan (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 2: 949–1003. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  4. Ahluwalia, Montek S. 1974“Income inequality: Some dimensions of the problem.” In Hollis Chenery et al. (eds.), Redistribution with Growth: 3–37. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 1976a“Income distribution and development: Some stylized facts.” American Economic Review 66:128– 135.Google Scholar
  6. 1976b“Inequality, poverty, and development.” Journal of Development Economics 3:307–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahluwalia, Montek S., Nicholas G. Carter, and Hollis B. Chenery 1979“Growth and poverty in developing countries.” Journal of Development Economics 6:299–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Altimir, Oscar 1974“A data file on income distribution based on household surveys in Latin American countries.” Economic A8 Commission for Latin America, and Development Research Center, International Bank of Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
  9. Anand, Sudir, and S. M. R. Kanbur 1993a“The Kuznets A9 process and the inequality–development relationship.” Journal of Development Economics 40:25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 1993b“Inequality and development: A critique.” Journal of Development Economics 41:19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arrighi, Giovanni, and Beverly J. Silver 2000“Global inequalities and ‘actually existing capitalism.’” Paper University presented at the Conference of Ethics and Globalization, Yale (April), New Haven, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Atkinson, Anthony 1995Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Babb, Sarah 2001Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bardham, Pranab K. 1973“On the incidence of poverty in rural India in the sixties.” Economic and Political Weekly 245:254.Google Scholar
  15. Berry, Albert, and William Cline 1979Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 1989“Poverty and public policy.” World Development 16:539–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bigsten, Arne 1986“Welfare and economic growth in Kenya, 1974–1976.” World Development 14:1151–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Birdsall, Nancy, David Ross, and Richard Sabot 1995“Inequality and growth reconsidered: Lessons from East Asia.” World Bank Economic Review 9:477–508.Google Scholar
  19. Bluestone, Barry, and Bennett Harrison 1982The Deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Bollen, Kenneth A., and Robert W. Jackman 1985“Political democracy and the size distribution of income.” American Sociological Review 13:438– 457.Google Scholar
  21. Booth, David 1985“Marxism and development sociology: Interpreting the impasse.” World Development 13:761–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bornschier, Volkier 1983“World economy, level of development, and income distribution: An integration of different approaches to the explanation of income inequality.” World Development 11:11– 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bornschier, Volker, and T. H. Ballmer-Cao 1979“Income inequality: A cross-national study of the relationships between MNC-penetration, dimensions of the power structure, and income distribution.” American Sociological Review 44:487–506.Google Scholar
  24. Bornschier, Volker, and Christopher Chase-Dunn 1985Transnational Corporations and Underdevelopment. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  25. Bound, John, and George Johnson 1992“Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980s: An evaluation of alternative explanations.” American Economic Review 82:371–392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bourguignon, François 1996“Comment on ‘Inequality, poverty, and growth: Where do we stand?’“ In Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995: 46–49. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  27. Bourguignon, François, and Christian Morrisson 1998“Inequality and development: The role of dualism.” Journal of Development Economics 57:233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bruno, Michael, and Boris Pleskovic 1996“Introduction.” In Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  29. Bruno, Michael, Martin Ravallion, and Lyn Squire 1998“Equity and growth in developing countries: Old and new perspectives on the policy issues.” In Uiro Tanzi and Ke-Young Chu (eds.), Income Distribution and High-Quality Growth: 117–146. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Chase-Dunn, Christopher 1975“The effects of international economic dependence on development and inequality.” American Sociological Review 40:720–739.Google Scholar
  31. Chenery, Hollis 1960“Patterns of industrial growth.” American Economic Review 50:624–654.Google Scholar
  32. Chenery, Hollis, M. S. Ahluwalia, C. L. G. Bell, J. H. Duloy, and R. Jolly 1974Redistribution with Growth. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Chenery, Hollis, and Moises Syrquin 1975Patterns of Development, 1950–1970. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Chenery, Hollis, and Lance Taylor 1968“Development patterns: Among countries and over time.” Review of Economics and Statistics 50:391–416.Google Scholar
  35. Cockett, Richard 1995Thinking the Unthinkable: Think-Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–1983. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  36. Conceiçao, Pedro, and James K. Galbraith 2001“Toward a new Kuznets hypothesis: Theory and evidence on growth and inequality.” In James K. Galbraith and Maureen Berner (eds.), Inequality and Industrial Change: A Global View: 139–160. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Crane, Diana 1972Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Crenshaw, Edward 1992“Cross-national determinants of income inequality: A replication and extension using ecological-evolutionary theory.” Social Forces 71:339– 363.Google Scholar
  39. Cutright, Philips 1967“Inequality: A cross-national analysis.” American Sociological Review 32:562–578.Google Scholar
  40. Danziger, Sheldon H., and Peter Gottschalk (eds.) 1993Uneven Tides: Rising Inequality in America. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Datta, Anindya 1986Growth with Equity: A Critique of the Lewis–Kuznets Tradition. Calcutta: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Deininger, Klaus, and Lyn Squire 1996“A new data set measuring income inequality.” World Bank Economic Review 10:565–591.Google Scholar
  43. 1998“New ways of looking at old issues: Inequality and growth.” Journal of Development Economics 57:259– 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dovring, Folke 1991Inequality: The Political Economy of Distribution. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  45. Dumke, Rolf 1991“Income inequality and industrialization in Germany, 1850–1913: The Kuznets curve re-examined.” In Y. S. Brenner, Hartmut Kaelble, and Mark Thomas (eds.), Income Distribution in Historical Perspective: 117–148. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Escobar, Arturo 1995Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Esteva, Gustavo 1992“Development.” In Wolfgang Sachs (ed.), The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  48. Evans, Peter, and Michael Timberlake 1980“Dependency, inequality, and the growth of the tertiary: A comparative analysis of less developed countries.” American Sociological Review 45:531–552.Google Scholar
  49. Fei, John C. H., and Gustav Ranis 1964Development of the Labor Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  50. 1997Growth and Development from an Evolutionary Perspective. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. Fei, John C. H., Gustav Ranis, and Shirley W. Y. Kuo 1979Growth with Equity: The Taiwan Case. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Fields, Gary S. 1980Poverty, Inequality, and Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. 1984a“Assessing progress toward greater equality of income distribution.” In Mitchell A. Seligson (ed.), The Gap Between the Rich and the Poor. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  54. 1984b“Employment, income distribution, and economic growth in seven small open economies.” Economic Journal 94:74–83.Google Scholar
  55. Findlay, Ronald, and Stanislaw Wellisz 1993Five Small Open Economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Firebaugh, Glenn 1992“Growth effects of foreign and domestic investment.” American Journal of Sociology 98:105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Fishlow, Albert 1972“Brazilian size distribution of income.” Papers and Proceedings of the American Economic Association 62:391–402.Google Scholar
  58. 1973“Some reflections on post-1964 Brazilian economic policy.” In A. Stepan (ed.), Authoritarian Brazil: 69–l18. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  59. 1996“Inequality, poverty, and growth: Where do we stand?” In Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995:25–39. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  60. FitzGerald, E. V. K. 1991“Kurt Mandelbaum and the classical tradition in development theory.” In Kurt Martin (ed.), Strategies of Economic Development: Readings in the Political Economy of Industrialization. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  61. Frank, Charles, and Richard Webb1977 “An Overview of Income Distribution in LDCs: Policy Alternatives and Design,” In Charles Frank and Richard Webb (eds.), Income Distribution and Growth in the Less Developed Countries: 7–43. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  62. Fuchs, Stephen 1992The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  63. Gagliani, Giorgio 1987“Income inequality and economic development.” Annual Review of Sociology 13:313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Galor, Oded, and Daniel Tsiddon 1996“Income distribution and growth: The Kuznets hypothesis revisited.” Econometrica 63(supplement):S103– S117.Google Scholar
  65. Glomm, Gerhard, and B. Ravikumar 1998“Increasing returns, human capital, and the Kuznets curve.” Journal of Development Economics 55:353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hall, Peter 1993“Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25:275–296.Google Scholar
  67. Hamilton, Richard F. 1991The Social Misconstruction of Reality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Harrison, Bennett, and Barry Bluestone 1988The Great U-Turn. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  69. Higgins, Matthew, and Jeffrey G. Williamson 1999“Explaining inequality the world round: Cohort size, Kuznets curves, and openness.” Working Paper no. 7224, July. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  70. Hill, Polly 1986Development Economics on Trial: The Anthropological Case for a Prosecution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  71. Hirschman, Albert O. 1981Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Hunt, Diana 1989Economic Theories of Development. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  73. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) 1998Facing Up to Inequality in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  74. Jackman, Robert W. 1974“Political democracy and social inequality.” American Sociological Review 39:29–45.Google Scholar
  75. Jain, Shail 1975Size Distribution of Income: A Compilation of Data. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  76. Jha, Sailesh K. 1996“The Kuznets curve: A reassessment.” World Development 24:773–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kalecki, Michal 1942“A theory of profits.” Economic Journal 52:258–267.Google Scholar
  78. Katz, Lawrence F., and David Autor 2000“Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality.” In O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), The Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, Chap. 26. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  79. Kim, Kwan S. 1997“Income distribution and poverty: An interregional comparison.” World Development 25:1909–1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. 1991“Epistemic cultures: Forms of reason in science.” History of Political Economy 23:105–122.Google Scholar
  81. Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio, and Timothy Patrick Moran 2005“Theorizing the A15 Relationship Between Inequality and Economic Growth.” Theory and Society 34 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  82. Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio, and William C. Smith 2000“Growth, Poverty, and Inequality in Latin America: Searching for the High Road.” Latin American Research Review 35:7–54Google Scholar
  83. Kravis, Irving B. 1960“International differences in the distribution of income.” Review of Economics and Statistics (November):408–416.Google Scholar
  84. Krueger, Alan B.2002“When It Comes to Income Inequality, More than just Market Forces are at Work.” The New York Times April 4, p.c2.Google Scholar
  85. Kuh, Edwin, and John R. Meyer 1957“How extraneous are extraneous estimates?” Review of Economics and Statistics 39:380–393.Google Scholar
  86. Kuhn, Thomas 1962The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  87. Kuznets, Simon 1955“Economic growth and income inequality.” American Economic Review 45:1–28.Google Scholar
  88. 1961Capital in the American Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  89. 1963“Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: Distribution of income by size.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 11:1–80.Google Scholar
  90. 1966Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure, and Spread. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Kwack, Sung Yeung 1990“The economic development of the Republic of Korea, 1965–1981.” In Lawrence J. Lau (ed.), Models of Development: A Comparative Study of Economic Growth in South Korea and Taiwan: 65–125. San Francisco: International Center for Economic Growth.Google Scholar
  92. Lai, Deepak 1985The Poverty of Development Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Lantican, Clarita P., Christina H. Gladwin, and James L. Seale Jr. 1996“Income and gender inequalities in Asia: Testing alternative theories of development.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 44:236–263.Google Scholar
  94. Latour, Bruno 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keyes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar 1986Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Lecaillon, Jacques, Felx Paukert, Christan Morrisson, and Dimitri Germidis 1984Income Distribution and Economic Development: An Analytical Survey. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  97. Lewis, W. Arthur 1954“Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour.” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 22:139–191.Google Scholar
  98. Lewis, Arthur W. 1958“Unlimited labor: Further notes.” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 26:1–31.Google Scholar
  99. 1976“Development and Distribution.” In Alec Cairncross and Mohinder Puri (eds.) Employment, Income Distribution, and Development Strategy: Problems of the Developing Countries: 26–42. New York: Holmes and Meirer Publishers.Google Scholar
  100. 1984“The state of development theory.” American Economic Review 74:1– 10.Google Scholar
  101. Leys, Colin 1996The Rise and Fall of Development Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Li, Hongyi, Lyn Squire, and Heng-fu Zou 1998“Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality.” Economic Journal 108:26–43.Google Scholar
  103. Lindert, Peter H., and Jeffrey Williamson 1985“Growth, equality, A18 and history.” Explorations in Economic History 22:341–377.Google Scholar
  104. Lipton, Michael 1997“Editorial: Poverty—Are there holes in the consensus?” World Development 25:1003–1007.Google Scholar
  105. Lundberg, Erik 1984“Lundberg on Kuznets.” In William Brit and Kenneth Elzinga (eds.), Contemporary Economists in Perspective, Vol. 2:523–542. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  106. Martin, Kurt 1991Modern development theory.” In Kurt Martin (ed.), Strategies of Economic Development: Readings in the Political Economy of Industrialization:27–73. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  107. Meesook, Oey A. 1975“Review of income distribution data: Thailand, A19 Malaysia, and Indonesia.” Discussion Paper No. 56. Princeton University: Woodrow Wilson School, Research Program in Economic Development, Princeton, USA.Google Scholar
  108. Meier, Gerald M., and Dudley Seers (eds.) 1984Pioneers in Development. New York: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Meyer, John W. 1977“The effects of education as an institution.” American Journal of Sociology 83:55–77.Google Scholar
  110. Milanovic, Branko 1994“Determinants of cross-country income inequality: A20 An ‘augmented’ Kuznets hypothesis.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 1246. World Bank: Policy Research Department, Transition Economics Division.Google Scholar
  111. Milner, Murray, Jr. 1987“Theories of inequality: An overview and a strategy for synthesis.” Social Forces 65:1053–1089.Google Scholar
  112. Minami, Ryoshin1998“Economic Development and Income Distribution in Japan: An Assessment of the Kuznets Hypothesis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 22:39–58.Google Scholar
  113. Muller, Edward N.1985“Income Inequality, Regime Repressiveness, and Political Violence.” American Sociological Review 50:47–61.Google Scholar
  114. 1988“Democracy, Economic Development, and Income Inequality.” American Sociological Review 53:50–68Google Scholar
  115. 1989“Democracy and Inequality.” American Sociological Review 54:868- 71.Google Scholar
  116. Nielsen, François 1994“Income inequality and industrial development revisited.” American Sociological Review 59:654–677.Google Scholar
  117. Nielsen, François, and Arthur S. Alderson 1995“Income inequality, development, and dualism: Results from an unbalanced cross-national panel.” American Sociological Review 60:674–701.Google Scholar
  118. Nugent, Jeffrey B. 1983“An alternative source of measurement error as an explanation of the inverted U-hypothesis.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 31:385–396.Google Scholar
  119. Nurkse, Ragwar 1953Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Ogwang, Tomson 1995“The economic development–income inequality nexus: Further evidence on Kuznets’s U-curve hypothesis.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 54:217–229.Google Scholar
  121. Oshima, Harry T. 1962“The international comparison of size distribution of family incomes with special reference to Asia.” Review of Economics and Statistics 44:439– 445.Google Scholar
  122. Papanek, Gustav F. 1978“Economic growth, income distribution, and the political process in less developed countries.” In Zvi Griliches et al. (eds.), Income Distribution and Economic Inequality: 259–274. New York: Halsted.Google Scholar
  123. Papanek, Gustav F., and O. Kyn 1987“Flattening the Kuznets curve: The consequences for income distribution of development strategy, government intervention, income, and the rate of growth.” Pakistan Development Review 108:97–125.Google Scholar
  124. Paukert, Felix 1973“Income distribution at different levels of development: A survey of the evidence.” International Labour Review 108:97–125.Google Scholar
  125. Pickering, Andrew (ed.) 1992Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  126. Ram, Rati 1995“Economic development and income inequality: An overlooked regression constraint.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 43:425– 434.Google Scholar
  127. 1997“Level of economic development and income inequality: Evidence from the postwar developed world.” Southern Economic Journal 64:576–583.Google Scholar
  128. Randolph, Susan M., and William F. Lott 1993“Can the Kuznets effect be relied on to induce equalizing growth?” World Development 21:829–840.Google Scholar
  129. Ranis, Gustav 1977“Growth and distribution: Trade-offs or compliments?” In William Loeher and John Powelson (eds.), Economic Development, Poverty, and Income Distribution: 41–59. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  130. 1996“Comment on ‘Inequality, poverty, and growth: Where do we stand?’” In Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995:50–55. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  131. Ravallion, Martin 1995“Growth and poverty: Evidence for developing countries in the 1980s.” Economics Letters 48:411–417.Google Scholar
  132. Robinson, Sherman 1976“A note on the U-hypothesis relating income inequality and economic development.” American Economic Review 66:437–440.Google Scholar
  133. Rodrik, Dani 1998“Comments on ‘Equity and growth in developing countries: Old and new perspectives on the policy issues.’” In Uiro Tanzi and Ke-Young Chu (eds.), Income Distribution and High-Quality Growth: 159–163. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  134. Rubinson, Richard 1976“The word-economy A22 and the distribution of income within states: A cross-national study.” American Sociological Review 41:638– 659.Google Scholar
  135. Rubinson, Richard, and Dan Quinlan 1977“Democracy and social inequality: A reanalysis.” American Sociological Review 42:611–623.Google Scholar
  136. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Theda Skocpol (eds.) 1996States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  137. Rule, James B. 1997Theory and Progress in Social Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Sachs, I. 1976The Discovery of the Third World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  139. Sachs, Wolfgang 1990“The archaeology of the development idea.” Interculture 23:2–37.Google Scholar
  140. Saith, Ashwani 1983“Development and distribution: A critique of the cross-country U-hypothesis.” Journal of Development Economics 13:367–382.Google Scholar
  141. Sawyer, Malcolm 1976“Income distribution A23 in OECD countries.” OECD Economic Outlook: Occasional Studies 48:3–36.Google Scholar
  142. Schuurman, Frans J. (ed.) 1993Beyond the Impasse: New Directions in Development Theory. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  143. Seers, Dudley 1979“The birth, life, and death of development economics.” Development and Change 10:707–718.Google Scholar
  144. Sen, Amartya 1983“Development: Which way now?” Economic Journal 93:745–762.Google Scholar
  145. Simpson, Miles 1990“Political rights and income inequality: A cross-national test.” American Sociological Review 55:682– 693.Google Scholar
  146. Sklair, Leslie 1988“Transcending the impasse: Metatheory, theory, and empirical research in the sociology of underdevelopment.” World Development 16:697– 709.Google Scholar
  147. Sklair, Leslie 1997“Social movements for global capitalism: The transnational capitalist class in action.” Review of International Political Economy 4:514–538.Google Scholar
  148. Söderberg, Johan 1991“Wage differentials in Sweden, 1725–1950.” In Y. S. Brenner, Hartmut Kaelble, and Mark Thomas (eds.), Income Distribution in Historical Perspective: 76–95. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  149. Srinivasan, T. N. 1977“Development, poverty, and basic human needs: Some issues.” Food Research Institute Studies 16:11– 28.Google Scholar
  150. Stallings, Barbara, Nancy Birdsall, and Julie Clugage 2000“Growth and inequality: Do regional patterns redeem Kuznets?” In Andres Solimano, Eduardo Aninat, and Nancy Birdsall (eds.), Distributive Justice and Economic Development. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  151. Stern, Nicolas 1989“The economics of development: A survey.” Economic Journal 99:597–685.Google Scholar
  152. Stewart, Frances 1978“Inequality, technology, and payment systems.” World Development 6:275–293.Google Scholar
  153. Sundrum, R. M. 1990Income Distribution in Less Developed Countries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  154. Swamy, S. 1967“Structural change in the distribution of income by size: The case of India.” Review of Income and Wealth 12:155–174.Google Scholar
  155. Teachman, Jay D. 1983“State power, socioeconomic characteristics, and income inequality: A cross-national analysis.” Human Organization 42:205–213.Google Scholar
  156. Thomas, Mark 1991“The evolution of inequality in Australia in the nineteenth century.” In Y. S. Brenner, Hartmut Kaelble, and Mark Thomas (eds.), Income Distribution in Historical Perspective: 149–173. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  157. Tilly, Charles 1984Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  158. Toye, John 1993Dilemmas of Development: Reflections on the Counter-Revolution in Development Economics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  159. Turnham, David 1993Employment and Development in New Review of Evidence. Paris: Development Center, OECD.Google Scholar
  160. Vandergeest, Peter, and Frederick H. Buttell 1988“Marx, Weber, and development sociology: Beyond the impasse.” World Development 16:683–695.Google Scholar
  161. Weede, Erich 1980“Beyond misspecification in sociological analysis of income inequality.” American Sociological Review 45:497–501.Google Scholar
  162. Weede, Erich 1982“The effects of democracy and socialist strength on the size distribution of income: Some more evidence.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 23:151–165.Google Scholar
  163. Weede, Erich, and Joachim Kummer 1985“Some criticism of recent work on world system status, inequality, and democracy.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 26:135–148.Google Scholar
  164. Weede, Erich, and Horst Tiefenbach 1981“Some recent explanations of income inequality: An evaluation and critique.” International Studies Quarterly 25:255–282.Google Scholar
  165. Weisskoff, Richard 1970“Income distribution and economic growth in Puerto Rico, Argentina, and Mexico.” Review of Income and Wealth 16:303–332.Google Scholar
  166. Williamson, Jeffrey G. 1991aInequality, Poverty, and History. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  167. 1991b“British inequality during the industrial revolution: Accounting for the Kuznets curve.” In Y. S. Brenner, Hartmut Kaelble, and Mark Thomas (eds.), Income Distribution in Historical Perspective: 57–75. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  168. 1997Industrialization, Inequality, and Economic Growth. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elger.Google Scholar
  169. World Bank 1993The East Asian Miracle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  170. 2000World Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  171. Yonay, Yuval P. 1998The Struggle over the Soul of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyState University of New York – Stony BrookStony Brook

Personalised recommendations