Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Assessing Social Interest in Burnout Using Google Trends Data

  • 38 Accesses


Burnout is a serious problem in modern society and early detection methods are needed to successfully handled its multiple effects. The latter refer to working well-being, as well as to the affective, psychological, physiological, and behavioral well-being of workers. However, in many countries official statistics on this topic are not available. For this reason, we propose to use Google Trends data as proxies for the interest in burnout and to analyze them through the functional data analysis approach. The latter allows to address the so-called ‘curse of dimensionality’ of big data, enabling an effective statistical analysis when the number of variables exceeds the number of observations. Under this framework, the functional analysis of variance (FANOVA) model is used for testing a macro geographic area effect on search queries for the keyword “burnout” in Italy. The estimation of the FANOVA model is proposed in a finite dimensional space generated by a basis function representation. Thus, the functional model is reduced to a MANOVA model on the basis coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. Aguilera, A. M., & Aguilera-Morillo, M. C. (2013). Comparative study of different B-spline approaches for functional data. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(7–8), 1568–1579.

  2. Anderson, T. (2003). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis (3rd ed.). London: Wiley.

  3. Behseta, S., Kass, R., Moorman, D., & Olson, C. (2007). Testing equality of several functions: Analysis of single-unit firing-rate curves across multiple experimental conditions. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 3958–3975.

  4. Borritz, M., Rugulies, R., Christensen, K., Villadsen, E., & Kristensen, T. (2006). Burnout as a predictor of self-reported sickness absence among human service workers: Prospective findings from three year follow up of the PUMA study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63, 98–106.

  5. Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the present with google trends. Economic Record, 88, 2–9.

  6. Cuevas, A., Febrero, M., & Fraiman, R. (2004). An anova test for functional data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 47(1), 111–112.

  7. De Boor, C. (2001). A practical guide to splines (revised ed.). New York: Springer.

  8. Di Battista, T., Fortuna, F., & Maturo, F. (2016). Parametric functional analysis of variance for fish biodiversity assessment. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 28, 101–109.

  9. Di Bella, E., Leporatti, L., & Maggino, F. (2018). Big data and social indicators: Actual trends and new perspectives. Social Indicators Research, 135(3), 869–878.

  10. Dyrbye, L., Shanafelt, T., Balch, C., Satele, D., Sloan, J., & Freischlag, J. (2011). Relationship between work-home conflicts and burnout among American surgeons: A comparison by sex. Archives of Surgery, 146, 211–217.

  11. Eurofound, (2016). Sixth European Working conditions survey—Overview report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  12. Faraway, J. (1997). Regression analysis for a functional response. Technometrics, 39, 254–261.

  13. Ferraty, F., & Vieu, P. (2006). Nonparametric functional data analysis. New York: Springer.

  14. Ferraty, F., Vieu, P., & Viguier-Pla, S. (2007). Factor-based comparison of groups of curves. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 4903–4910.

  15. Fortuna, F., Maturo, F., & Di Battista, T. (2018). Clustering functional data streams: Unsupervised classification of soccer top players based on Google trends. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 34, 1448–1460.

  16. Glasson, M., Trepanier, J., Patruno, V.,  Daas, P., Skaliotis, M.,& Khan, A. (2013). What does “Big Data” mean for Official Statistics? In Paper for the high-level group for the modernization of statistical production and services, March 10.

  17. Goel, S., Hofman, J., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D., & Watts, D. (2010). Predicting consumer behavior with web search. In S. Levin (Ed.), Proceedings of the National academy of sciences, volume 107 of 41 (pp. 17486–17490). New York: Princeton University, National Academy of Sciences.

  18. Hall, P., & Van Keilegom, I. (2007). Two-sample tests in functional data analysis starting from discrete data. Statistica Sinica, 17, 1511–1531.

  19. Honkonen, T., Ahola, K., Pertovaara, M., Isometsa, E., Kalimo, R., & Nykyri, e a E. (2000). The association between burnout and physical illness in the general population—Results from the finnish health 2000 study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61(59–66), 2006.

  20. Kaufman, C., & Sainy, S. (2010). Bayesian functional ANOVA modeling using Gaussian process prior distributions. Bayesian Analysis, 5(1), 123–150.

  21. Leiter, M., & Schaufeli, W. (1996). Consistency of the burnout construct across occupations. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 9, 229–243.

  22. Lizano, E. (2015). Examining the impact of job burnout on the health and well-being of human service workers: A systematic review and synthesis. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39, 167–181.

  23. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2, 99–113.

  24. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1986). Maslach burn-out inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  25. Maslach, C., Leiter, M., & Schaufeli, W. (2008). Measuring burnout. In C. Cooper & S. Cartwright (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational well-being (pp. 86–108). Oxford: The Oxford Handbook.

  26. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W., & Leiter, M. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.

  27. Maturo, F., Fortuna, F., & Di Battista, T. (2018). Testing equality of functions across multiple experimental conditions for different ability levels in the IRT context: The case of the IPRASE TLT 2016 survey. Social Indicators Research, 146, 19–39.

  28. Ramsay, J., & Silverman, B. (2005). Functional data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

  29. Sayes, W., De Ketelaerea, B., & Dariusa, P. (2008). Potential applications of functional data analysis in chemometrics. Journal of Chemometrics, 22, 335–344.

  30. Seber, G. (1984). Multivariate observations. New York: Wiley.

  31. Shanafelt, T., Balch, C., Bechamps, G., Russell, T., Dyrbye, L., Satele, D., et al. (2009). Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons. Annals of Surgery, 250, 463–471.

  32. Shen, Q., & Faraway, J. (2004). An F test for linear models with functional responses. Statistical Sinica, 14, 1239–1257.

  33. Suner-Soler, R., Grau-Martín, A., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Braga, F., Font-Mayolas, S., et al. (2014). The consequences of burnout syndrome among healthcare professionals in Spain and Spanish speaking Latin American countries. Burnout Research, 1, 82–89.

  34. Wilson, S., Daar, D., Sinno, S., & Levine, S. (2018). Public interest in breast augmentation: Analysis and implications of google trends data. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 42(3), 648–655.

  35. Zeynalov, A. (2017). Forecasting tourist arrivals in prague: Google econometrics. Mpra paper, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Download references


The authors Ana M. Aguilera and M. Escabias thank the support of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities under project MTM2017-88708-P (also supported by the FEDER program).

Author information

Correspondence to Francesca Fortuna.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguilera, A.M., Fortuna, F., Escabias, M. et al. Assessing Social Interest in Burnout Using Google Trends Data. Soc Indic Res (2019).

Download citation


  • Burnout
  • Google trends data
  • FDA
  • FANOVA model