Advertisement

Residential Mobility Decreases the Perception of Social Norm Violations

  • Siyang LuoEmail author
  • Qianting Kong
  • Zijun Ke
  • Liqin Huang
  • Meihua Yu
  • Yiyi Zhu
  • Ying Xu
Original Research
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

Social norms are essential but vary across human societies. With the internationalization of human society, the population’s mobility has greatly increased, which can impact people’s psychological states and behaviors. The current research aimed to examine the hypothesis that residential mobility plays a crucial role in the perception of social norm violations with six studies. Studies 1 and 2 used an association test and experimental manipulation, respectively, and found that residential mobility was associated with a decreased perception of weak social norm violations in females. Study 3 further suggested that residential mobility modulates individuals’ perception threshold to social norm violation behavior. Studies 4 and 5 revealed that the relationship between residential mobility and perception of social norm violations is mediated by face threats, and a mini meta-analysis further confirmed the significant effect of residential mobility on the perception of social norm violations. Our findings provide insights into how and why individuals’ perceptions of social norm-violating behaviors vary according to the dynamic development of society. As residential mobility continues to increase worldwide, especially in developing countries, we may observe concomitant changes in the subjective perception of social norms that should be given more attention during social governance.

Keywords

Residential mobility Social norm violations Face threatening 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (Project 17YJCZH121) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Project 2017A030310553) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 31800916).

Author Contributions

KQT and LSY designed the research; KQT, ZYY, XY conducted the experiment; KQT, KZJ and LSY analyzed the data; and KQT, YMH, HLQ, LSY and KZJ wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Compliance With Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethics Statement

All participants gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Department of Psychology of Sun Yat-sen University Ethics Committee.

Code Availability

The custom computer code and questionnaire that was used in the main analysis of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Data Availability

The deidentified data that support the main findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Supplementary material

11205_2019_2224_MOESM1_ESM.docx (439 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 439 kb)

References

  1. Abell, E., & Gecas, V. (1997). Guilt, shame, and family socialization: A retrospective study. Journal of Family Issues,18(2), 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bao, Y., Zhou, K. Z., & Su, C. (2003). Face consciousness and risk aversion: do they affect consumer decision-making? Psychology & Marketing,20(8), 733–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F. (1986). Identity: Cultural change and the struggle for self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F. (1987). How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(1), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bicchieri, C. (2005). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosker, M., Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & Schramm, M. (2012). Relaxing hukou: Increased labor mobility and china’ s economic geography. Journal of Urban Economics,72(2–3), 252–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology,13(3), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Capraro, V., & Perc, M. (2018). Grand challenges in social physics: In pursuit of moral behavior. Frontiers in Physics, 6, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, J. D., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Individual differences in the accuracy of detecting social covariations: Ecological sensitivity. Journal of Research in Personality,42(2), 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. (2013). The age of migration-international movements in the modern world (S. Castles Ed. ed.).Google Scholar
  14. Chan, H., Wan, L. C., & Sin, L. Y. (2009). The contrasting effects of culture on consumer tolerance: Interpersonal face and impersonal fate. Journal of Consumer Research,36(2), 292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chekroun, P., & Brauer, M. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: The effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology,32(6), 853–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, X., Szolnoki, A., & Perc, M. (2012). Risk-driven migration and the collective-risk social dilemma. Physical Review E,86(3), 036101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chu, G. C. (1985). The changing concept of self in contemporary China. In A. J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives (pp. 252–277). New York: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Chu, R. (2006). Social interactions among the Chinese: On the issue of face. Chinese Social Psychological Review,2, 79–106.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, D. (1998). Culture, social organization, and patterns of violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75(2), 408–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, D. (2001). Cultural variation: Considerations and implications. Psychological Bulletin,127(4), 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin,122(1), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Czaika, M., & De Haas, H. (2014). The globalization of migration: Has the world become more migratory? International Migration Review,48(2), 283–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ding, G., & Bao, Y. (2014). Editorial perspective: Assessing developmental risk in cultural context: the case of ‘left behind’ children in rural China. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,55(4), 411–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fan, C. C. (2003). Rural-urban migration and gender division of labor in transitional China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,27(1), 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., et al. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science,332(6033), 1100–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Garden City.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Oxford: Aldine.Google Scholar
  28. Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,10(10), 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gordon, I., Vander Wyk, B. C., Bennett, R. H., Cordeaux, C., Lucas, M. V., Eilbott, J. A., et al. (2013). Oxytocin enhances brain function in children with autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,110(52), 20953–20958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R. J., & Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,90(2), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halpern, D. (2001). Moral values, social trust and inequality: Can values explain crime? British Journal of Criminology,41(2), 236–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Helbing, D., Brockmann, D., Chadefaux, T., Donnay, K., Blanke, U., Woolley-Meza, O., et al. (2015). Saving human lives: What complexity science and information systems can contribute. Journal of Statistical Physics,158(3), 735–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2001). Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology,208(1), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ho, D. (1991). The concept of “face” in Chinese-American interaction. In Encountering the Chinese: a guide for Americans, 111–124.Google Scholar
  35. Ho, V. T., Rousseau, D. M., & Levesque, L. L. (2006). Social networks and the psychological contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties, and beliefs regarding employer obligations. Human Relations,59(4), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holleran, P. A., Littman, D. C., Freund, R. D., & Schmaling, K. B. (1982). A signal detection approach to social perception: Identification of negative and positive behaviors by parents of normal and problem children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,10(4), 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. International Organization for Migration. (2015). World migration 2015: Migrants and cities: New partnerships to manage mobility. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar
  38. Jonsson, G. (2009). Comparative report: African migration trends. African perspectives on human mobility programme.Google Scholar
  39. Joy, A. (2001). Gift giving in Hong Kong and the continuum of social ties. Journal of Consumer Research,28(2), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King, A. (1988). Face, shame and the analysis of behavior patterns of the Chinese. In The Psychology of the Chinese, pp. 319–345.Google Scholar
  41. King, A., & Bond, M. H. (1985). The Confucian paradigm of man: A sociological view. In Chinese culture and mental health, pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
  42. Krumhuber, E. G., Tsankova, E., & Kappas, A. (2016). Examining subjective and physiological responses to norm violation using text-based vignettes. International Journal of Psychology,53(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Levari, D. E., Gilbert, D. T., Wilson, T. D., Beau, S., Amodio, D. M., & Thalia, W. (2018). Prevalence-induced concept change in human judgment. Science,360(6396), 1465–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, J. J., & Su, C. (2007). How face influences consumption. International Journal of Market Research,49(2), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lu, M., & Gao, H. (2011). Labour market transition, income inequality and economic growth in China. International Labour Review, 150, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lun, J., Oishi, S., & Tenney, E. R. (2012). Residential mobility moderates preferences for egalitarian versus loyal helpers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,48(1), 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ma, Y., & Han, S. (2012). Functional dissociation of the left and right fusiform gyrus in self-face recognition. Human Brain Mapping,33(10), 2255–2267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Magdol, L. (2002). Is moving gendered? The effects of residential mobility on the psychological well-being of men and women. Sex roles,47(11), 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mak, W. W., Chen, S. X., Lam, A. G., & Yiu, V. F. (2009). Understanding distress: the role of face concern among Chinese Americans, European Americans, Hong Kong Chinese, and mainland Chinese. The Counseling Psychologist,37(2), 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mak, W. W., & Cheung, R. Y. (2012). Psychological distress and subjective burden of caregivers of people with mental illness: the role of affiliate stigma and face concern. Community Mental Health Journal,48(3), 270–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review,98(2), 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mazzurega, M., Marisa, J., Zampini, M., & Pavani, F. (2018). Thinner than yourself: Self-serving bias in body size estimation. Psychological Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1119-z.
  54. McElreath, R. (2004). Community structure, mobility and the strength of norms in an African society, the Sangu of Tanzania. In Foundations of human sociality: Ethnogra, pp. 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miller, S. C., Kennedy, C. C., DeVoe, D. C., Hickey, M., Nelson, T., & Kogan, L. (2009). An examination of changes in oxytocin levels in men and women before and after interaction with a bonded dog. Anthrozoös,22(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moineddin, R., Matheson, F. I., & Glazier, R. H. (2007). A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models. BMC Medical Research Methodology,7(1), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mu, Y., Kitayama, S., Han, S., & Gelfand, M. J. (2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,112(50), 15348–15353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oetzel, J., Ting-Toomey, S., Masumoto, T., Yokochi, Y., Pan, X., Takai, J., et al. (2001). Face and facework in conflict: A cross-cultural comparison of China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Monographs,68(3), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ohbuchi, K. I., Tamura, T., Quigley, B. M., Tedeschi, J. T., Madi, N., Bond, M. H., et al. (2004). Anger, blame, and dimensions of perceived norm violations: Culture, gender, and relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,34(8), 1587–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oishi, S. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science,5(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oishi, S., & Graham, J. (2010). Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science,5(4), 356–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., Miao, F. F., Talhelm, T., Endo, Y., Uchida, Y., et al. (2013). Residential mobility increases motivation to expand social network: But why? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,49(2), 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oishi, S., Lun, J., & Sherman, G. D. (2007). Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93(1), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oishi, S., Miao, F. F., Koo, M., Kisling, J., & Ratliff, K. A. (2012). Residential mobility breeds familiarity-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,102(1), 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Oishi, S., & Talhelm, T. (2012). Residential mobility: What psychological research reveals. Current Directions in Psychological Science,21(6), 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ozsoy, S., Esel, E., & Kula, M. (2009). Serum oxytocin levels in patients with depression and the effects of gender and antidepressant treatment. Psychiatry Research,169(3), 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Royzman, E. B., Leeman, R. F., & Baron, J. (2009). Unsentimental ethics: Towards a content-specific account of the moral–conventional distinction. Cognition,112(1), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science,277(5328), 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science,8, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Su, J. C., Chiu, C. Y., Lin, W. F., & Oishi, S. (2016). Social monitoring matters for deterring social deviance in stable but not mobile socio-ecological contexts. PLoS ONE,11(11), e0167053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thornton, I. M., Srismith, D., Oxner, M., & Hayward, W. G. (2019). Other-race faces are given more weight than own-race faces when assessing the composition of crowds. Vision Research, 157, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ting-Toomey, S., Gao, G., Trubisky, P., Yang, Z., Soo Kim, H., Lin, S.-L., et al. (1991). Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study in five cultures. International Journal of conflict management,2(4), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. van Honk, J., Schutter, D. J., Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., Tuiten, A., & Koppeschaar, H. (2004). Testosterone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology,29(7), 937–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang, C. S., & Leung, A. K. Y. (2010). The cultural dynamics of rewarding honesty and punishing deception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,36(11), 1529–1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differeces and similarities in behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,46, 55–123.Google Scholar
  76. Wu, W. (2006). Migrant intra-urban residential mobility in urban China. Housing Studies,21(5), 745–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wu, T., Fu, F., Zhang, Y., & Wang, L. (2012). Expectation-driven migration promotes cooperation by group interactions. Physical Review E,85(6), 066104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology,113(2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yu, J., & Xie, Y. (2015). Cohabitation in China: Trends and determinants. Population and Development Review, 41(4), 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and DiseaseSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations