Advertisement

Inequality Assessment by Probabilistic Development Indices

  • Annibal Parracho Sant’Anna
  • Márcia de Freitas Siqueira Sadok Menna BarretoEmail author
Original Research
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

This paper analyses the Human Development Index (HDI) time series from 2010 to 2017. An alternative index is studied, which combines the same components of the HDI by means of the joint probability of reaching the lower frontier. Another index combines these partial components with four other components that access different dimensions of inequality. This probabilistic approach has the advantage of allowing the index to be extended with an unlimited number of quality-of-life dimensions. The focus on the lower frontier also allows one to assign higher values to variations away from the extreme poverty than to variations within extremely high well-being. The consistency of HDI and of the inequality-corrected HDI is confirmed. Moreover, this work demonstrates that the probabilistic approach allows the use of the same principle to evaluate, in a consistent way, a large number of dimensions. The evolution of 4-year averages is also analyzed.

Keywords

Human Development Index Composition of probabilistic preferences Multi-criteria decision analysis Uncertainty modelling 

Notes

References

  1. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the World, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binder, C. (2017). Measuring uncertainty based on rounding: New method and application to inflation expectations. Journal of Monetary Economics, 90, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carley, M. (1981). Political and bureaucratic dilemmas in social indicators for policy making. Social Indicators Research, 9(1), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Celemín, J., & Velázquez, G. (2018). Spatial analysis of the relationship between a Life Quality Index, HDI and poverty in the province of Buenos Aires and the autonomous city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Social Indicators Research, 140(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Çilingirtürk, A., & Koçak, H. (2018). Human Development Index (HDI) rank-order variability. Social Indicators Research, 137(2), 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henzel, S., & Rengel, M. (2017). Dimensions of macroeconomic uncertainty: A common factor analysis. Economic Inquiry, 55(2), 843–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jurado, K., Ludvigson, S., & Ng, S. (2015). Measuring uncertainty. American Economic Review, 105(3), 1177–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mariano, E. B., Sobreiro, V. A., & Nascimento Rebelatto, D. A. (2015). Human development and data envelopment analysis: A structured literature review. Omega, 54, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nanaj, A., & Duka, R. (2017). The Dynamic of Poverty Measurement Indexes, from HDI to MPI. Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, 3(1), 52–62.Google Scholar
  10. Natoli, R., & Zuhair, S. (2011). Measuring progress: A comparison of the GDP, HDI, GS and the RIE. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sant’Anna, A. P. (2015a). Probabilistic human development indices. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 12, 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sant’Anna, A. P. (2015b). Probabilistic composition of preferences: Theory and applications. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Sant’Anna, A. P., Lima, G. B. A., Sant’Anna, L. A. F. P., & Gavião, L. O. (2018). Two-stage composition of probabilistic preferences. Annals of Data Science.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-018-0177-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. UNDESA. (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 Revision. New York. Retrieved 21 January 2019 from http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp.
  15. World Bank ICP. (2017). Fundamentals of purchasing power parities. Retrieved 21 January 2019 from http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/332341517441011666/PPP-brochure-2017-webformat-rev.pdf.
  16. Zirogiannis, N., Krutilla, K., Tripodis, Y. & Fledderman, K. (2019). Human development over time: An empirical comparison of a Dynamic Index and the standard HDI. Social Indicators Research, 142(1), 773–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFFNiteróiBrazil
  2. 2.Centro Universitário La Salle do Rio de Janeiro – UNILASALLE-RJNiteróiBrazil

Personalised recommendations