Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 147, Issue 1, pp 287–310 | Cite as

Preferences or Patriarchy: Why Do Religious Women Work Less?

  • Lewis DavisEmail author
  • Jia Gao
Original Research
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

Religious women work less than their non-religious counterparts. Is this because they want to work less or because patriarchal social norms limit their choices? To address this question, we estimate the employment happiness premium, which we define as the happiness gain associated with being employed, for men and women belonging to six world religions and for the non-religious. Our results indicate that the employment happiness premium is higher for men than for women for every world religion and that the gender gap in the employment happiness premium varies significantly across religions. Next, we ask whether the gender gap in the employment happiness premium can explain the gender gap in employment. That is, is it plausible that preferences explain employment patterns across religions and genders? We find that preferences plausibly explain the gender employment gap for Buddhists, Orthodox Christians, and the non-religious. In contrast, they explain less than half the observed gender employment gap for Hindus, Muslims, Catholics and Protestants. Our findings are consistent with a significant role for patriarchal social norms in constraining female employment in these religious traditions.

Keywords

Happiness Religion Gender inequality Employment Gender division of labor Subjective well-being Patriarchy 

JEL Classification

D60 I31 Z12 J20 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Roger Hoerl, Lori Marso, Ann Owen, Steven Schmidt and participants in the Symposium on Religion, Social Conflict and Social Cohesion, the Union College Economics Seminar, and the Southern Economic Association Meetings for useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Any remaining errors are our own.

References

  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics,88(9), 2009–2042.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,128(2), 469–530.Google Scholar
  3. Algan, Y., Cahuc, P. (2003). Job protection and family policies: The Macho hypothesis. University Paris 1. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  4. Ashraf, Q., & Galor, O. (2013). The ‘Out of Africa’ hypothesis, human genetic diversity, and comparative economic development. American Economic Review,103(1), 1–46.Google Scholar
  5. Bardasi, E., & Francesconi, M. (2004). The impact of atypical employment on individual well-being: Evidence from a panel of British workers. Social Science and Medicine, 58(9), 1671–1688.Google Scholar
  6. Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. (2003). Religion and economic growth across countries. American Sociological Review,68(5), 760–781.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources,50(2), 317–372.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, A. E., & Lelkes, O. (2005). Deliver us from evil: Religion as insurance. No 06/03, Papers on Economics of Religion from Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada, 2005. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gra:paoner:06/03.
  9. Cohen, A. B. (2002). The importance of spirituality in well-being for Jews and Christians. Journal of Happiness Studies,3(3), 287–310.Google Scholar
  10. Cooray, A., & Potrafke, N. (2011). Gender inequality in education: Political institutions or culture and religion? European Journal of Political Economy,27(2), 268–280.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, L. S., & Reynolds, M. (2018). Gendered language and the educational gender gap. Economics Letters,168, 46–48.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, L. S., & Williamson, C. (2018). Does individualism promote gender inequality?. Starkville: Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, L. S., & Wu, S. (2018). The taste for status in international comparison. SSRN Abstract# 3210629.Google Scholar
  14. Dildar, Y. (2015). Patriarchal norms, religion, and female labor supply: Evidence from Turkey. World Development,76, 40–61.Google Scholar
  15. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology,29(1), 94–122.Google Scholar
  16. Dollar, D., & Gatti, R. (1999). Gender inequality, income and growth: Are good times good for women? Policy research report on gender and development working paper series no. 1.Google Scholar
  17. Fernández, R. (2011). Does culture matter? In J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, & M. O. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1, pp. 481–510). North-Holland.Google Scholar
  18. Fernández, R., & Fogli, A. (2009). Culture: an empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics,1(1), 146–177.Google Scholar
  19. Foroutan, Y. (2007). Determinant’s of women’s employment participation: Muslim/non-Muslim differentials in Australia. PhD diss., Australian National University.Google Scholar
  20. Foroutan, Y. (2008). Women’s employment, religion and multiculturalism: Socio-demographic emphasis. Journal of Population Research,25(1), 63–90.Google Scholar
  21. Foroutan, Y. (2015). Misunderstood population? Methodological debate on demography of Muslims. Yearbook of International Religious Demography,2015, 163–176.Google Scholar
  22. Forsythe, N., & Korzeniewicz, R. P. (2000). Gender inequalities and economic growth: A longitudinal evaluation. Economic Development and Cultural Change,48(3), 573–617.Google Scholar
  23. Fortin, N. M. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,21(3), 416–438.Google Scholar
  24. Gay, V., Hicks, D. L., Santacreu-Vasut, E., & Shoham, A. (2015). Decomposing culture: Can gendered language influence women’s economic engagement? Fox School of Business Research Paper 15-046.Google Scholar
  25. Gay, V., Santacreu-Vasut, E., & Shoham, A. (2013). The grammatical origins of gender roles. Berkeley Economic History Laboratory Working Paper 3.Google Scholar
  26. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2003). People’s opium? Religion and economic attitudes. Journal of Monetary Economics,50(1), 225–282.Google Scholar
  27. Heineck, G. (2004). Does religion influence the labor supply of married women in Germany? The Journal of Socio-Economics,33(3), 307–328.Google Scholar
  28. Helliwell, J. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.Google Scholar
  29. Helliwell, J. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34–C45.Google Scholar
  30. Hicks, D. L., Santacreu-Vasut, E., & Shoham, A. (2014). Does mother tongue make for women’s work? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,110(2), 19–44.Google Scholar
  31. Hirschmann, N. J. (2003). The subject of liberty: Towards a feminist theory of freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R., Norris, P., & Ronald, I. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Keister, L. A., & Sherkat, D. E. (2014). Religion and inequality in America: Research and theory on religion’s role in stratification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lehrer, E. L. (1995). The effects of religion on the labor supply of married women. Social Science Research,24(3), 281–301.Google Scholar
  35. Lehrer, E. L. (2004). Religion as determinant of economic and demographic behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review,30(4), 707–726.Google Scholar
  36. Louis, V. V., & Zhao, S. (2002). Effects of family structure, family SES, and adulthood experiences on life satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues,23(8), 986–1005.Google Scholar
  37. Marso, L. J. (2015). Feminism. In M. T. Gibbons (Ed.), The encyclopedia of political thought (1st ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Mavisakalyan, A. (2015). Gender in language and gender in employment. Oxford Development Studies,43(4), 403–424.Google Scholar
  39. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research,17(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  40. Meier, S. & Stutzer, A. (2006). Is volunteering rewarding in itself? In IZA Working Paper No. 1045.Google Scholar
  41. Mishra, V. (2004). Muslim/non-Muslim differentials in fertility and family planning in India. East-West Center Working Paper No. 112, Population and Health Series. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  42. Murphy, K. M., & Topel, R. H. (1985). Estimation and inference in two-step econometric models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,3(4), 370–379.Google Scholar
  43. Nettle, D. (2006). Happiness: The science behind your smile. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Norris, P. (2009). Why do Arab states lag the world in gender equality? HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP09-020.Google Scholar
  45. Norton, S. W., & Tomal, A. (2009). Religion and female educational attainment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,41, 961–986.Google Scholar
  46. Oswald, A. J., & Powdthavee, N. (2008). Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges. Journal of Public Economics,92(5–6), 1061–1077.Google Scholar
  47. Pagan, A. (1984). Econometric issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors. International Economic Review,25(1), 221–247.Google Scholar
  48. Psacharopoulos, G., & Tzannatos, Z. (1989). Female labor force participation: An international perspective. The World Bank Research Observer,4(2), 187–201.Google Scholar
  49. Roy, O. (2004). Globalized Islam: The search for a new ummah. New York City: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Seguino, S. (2011). Help or hindrance? Religion’s impact on gender inequality in attitudes and outcomes. World Development,39(8), 1308–1321.Google Scholar
  51. Seguino, S. (2016). Global trends in gender equality. Journal of African Development,18(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  52. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy,1(2), 190–225.Google Scholar
  53. Van Hoorn, A., & Maseland, R. (2013). Does a Protestant work ethic exist? Evidence from the well-being effect of unemployment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,91, 1–12.Google Scholar
  54. Weinzierl, M. (2005). Estimating a relative utility function. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUnion CollegeSchenectadyUSA

Personalised recommendations