Advertisement

Measuring Multi-group Polarization, Segmentation and Ambiguity: Increasingly Unequal Yet Similar Constituent Canadian Income Distributions

  • Gordon AndersonEmail author
  • Jasmin Thomas
Original Research
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The Canadian income distribution is a mixture of Aboriginal, Non-Aboriginal, Urban, Rural and Gender based constituency distributions which Social Justice imperatives suggest should exhibit similarity across constituencies. Capturing the degree to which they are similar is closely related to notions of polarization and convergence among these many disparate constituencies. Unfortunately, increasing similarity increases the potential for ambiguity or lack of unanimity among the wellbeing indicators conventionally employed in exploring differences between groups, and the tools presently available only suit pairwise comparison or analyses of collections of latent, indeterminate groups. By exploiting subgroup non-decomposability of the Gini coefficient, this study produces three new tools for measuring the extent of segmentation, polarization and the potential for ambiguity in societal Income Wellbeing orderings among many identifiable subgroups. Employing these tools in an exploration of the evolution of constituent Canadian Income distributions over the first decade of the 21st Century reinforces the inequality—polarization distinction revealing increasing inequality coincident with diminishing segmentation and polarization which suggests some advancement of Canadas’ avowed social justice agenda. An increasing potential for ambiguity among wellbeing indicators is also apparent.

Keywords

Inequality measurement Societal segmentation Polarization Ambiguity Income distributions 

Notes

References

  1. Anderson, G. (2004). Toward an empirical analysis of polarization. Journal of Econometrics, 122(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, G. (2012). Boats and tides and ‘trickle down’ theories: What economists presume about wellbeing when they employ stochastic process theory in modeling behavior. Economics E-Journal 2012-42.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, G., & Leo, T. W. (2014). Ranking alternative non-combinable prospects: A stochastic dominance based route to the second best solution. University of Toronto, Department of Economics, Working Paper 520, 2014-10-20.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, G., Linton, O., & Thomas, J. (2017). Similarity, dissimilarity and exceptionality: generalizing Gini’s transvariation to measure “differentness” in many distributions. Metron, 75(2), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, G., Post, T., & Whang, Y. J. (2019). Somewhere between Utopia and Dystopia: Choosing from multiple incomparable prospects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1–29.Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkinson, A. B. (1983). Social justice and public policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson, A. B., & Brandolini, A. (2013). On the identification of the middle class. In Income inequality: Economic disparities and the middle class in affluent countries, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
  9. Baker, M., &., Milligan, K. (2008). How does job‐protected maternity leave affect mothers′ employment? Journal of Labor Economics, 26(4), 655–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2008). What is middle class about the middle classes around the world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Battistin, E., Blundell, R., & Lewbel, A. (2009). Why is consumption more log normal than income? Gibrat’s law revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 117(6), 1140–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blundell, R., & Preston, I. (1998). Consumption inequality and income uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 603–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonesteel, S., & Anderson, E. (2008). Canada’s relationship with Inuit: A history of policy and program development. Ottawa: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Bourguignon, F. (1979). Decomposable income inequality measures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 901–920.Google Scholar
  15. Browning, M., & Lusardi, A. (1996). Household saving: Micro theories and micro facts. Journal of Economic literature, 34(4), 1797–1855.Google Scholar
  16. Chretien, J. (2002). Address by Prime Minister Jean Chretien in reply to the speech from the Throne. Government of Canada. October 1, 2002.Google Scholar
  17. Chrétien, J. (2000). Tribute to the Right Honourable Pierre Elliot Trudeau, House of Commons, September 29, 2000. Office of the Prime Minister. Retrieved from Library and Archives Canada. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/primeministers/h4-4082-e.html.
  18. Crowley, T., & Crowley, T. A. (1990). Agnes Macphail and the politics of equality. James Lorimer & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Dagum, C. (1968). Multivariate Transvariation Theory Among Several Distributions and Its Economic Applications. Econometric Research Program, Princeton University. Research Memorandum, 100.Google Scholar
  20. Davidson, R. (2009). Reliable inference for the Gini index. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson, R., & Duclos, J. Y. (2000). Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica, 68(6), 1435–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duclos, J. Y., Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2004). Polarization: concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica, 72(6), 1737–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Esteban, J. M., & Ray, D. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 819–851.Google Scholar
  24. Feir, D., & Hancock, R. L. (2016). Answering the call: a guide to reconciliation for quantitative social scientists. Canadian Public Policy, 42(3), 350–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fong, F. (2017). Income inequality in Canada: The urban gap. Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Fortin, N., Green, D. A., Lemieux, T., Milligan, K., & Riddell, W. C. (2012). Canadian inequality: Recent developments and policy options. Canadian Public Policy, 38(2), 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foster, J. E., & Wolfson, M. C. (2010). Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the US. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedman, M. (1957). Theory of the consumption function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités Économiques. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
  30. Giles, D. E. (2004). Calculating a standard error for the Gini coefficient: some further results. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gini, C. (1912). Variabilità e mutabilità. Reprinted in E. Pizetti & T. Salvemini. Memorie di metodologica statistica. Google Scholar
  32. Gini, C. (1916). Il Concetto ditransvariazionee le sue prime applicazioni. Athenaeum.Google Scholar
  33. Gini, C. (1959). Transvariazione. Roma: Libreria Goliardica.Google Scholar
  34. Gordon, C. E., & White, J. P. (2014). Indigenous educational attainment in Canada. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(3), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Green, D. A., Riddell, W. C., & St-Hilaire, F. (2016). Income inequality in Canada: Driving forces, outcomes and policy. Income Inequality: The Canadian Story, 1–73. IRPP.Google Scholar
  36. Green, D. A., & Sand, B. M. (2015). Has the Canadian labour market polarized? Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 48(2), 612–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall, R. E. (1978). Stochastic implications of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis: theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 86(6), 971–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hey, J. D., & Lambert, P. J. (1980). Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient: comment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(3), 567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kanatami, I. T. (2014). Assessing the impact of the First Nations and Inuit Child Care Initiative (FNICCI) across Inuit Nunangat.Google Scholar
  40. Kay-Raining Bird, E. (2011). Health, education, language, dialect, and culture in first nations, inuit, and mtis communities in Canada: An overview. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, 35(2).Google Scholar
  41. Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., & Trannoy, A. (2008). Inequality of opportunities versus inequality of outcomes: Are Western societies all alike? Review of Income and Wealth, 54(4), 513–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., & Trannoy, A. (2009). Equality of opportunity and luck: Definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France. Journal of Public Economics, 93(11–12), 1189–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leo, T. W. (2017). On the asymptotic distribution of (generalized) Lorenz transvariation measures. METRON, 75(2), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leshno, M., & Levy, H. (2002). Preferred by “all” and preferred by “most” decision makers: Almost stochastic dominance. Management Science, 48(8), 1074–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lütkepohl, H. (1982). Differencing multiple time series: Another look at Canadian money and income data. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 3(4), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Modarres, R., & Gastwirth, J. L. (2006). A cautionary note on estimating the standard error of the Gini index of inequality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68(3), 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mookherjee, D., & Shorrocks, A. (1982). A decomposition analysis of the trend in UK income inequality. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 886–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moyser, M. (2017). Women and paid work. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  49. Mulroney, M. B. (1985). Opening statement at the First Ministers’ Conference on the Rights of Aboriginal Peoples, April 2–3, 1985. Ottawa, April 2–3, 1985. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 1985. 21 p.Google Scholar
  50. National Aboriginal Economic Development Board [NAEDB]. (2012). The Aboriginal Economic Benchmarking Report.Google Scholar
  51. National Aboriginal Economic Development Board [NAEDB]. (2015). The Aboriginal Economic Progress Report 2015.Google Scholar
  52. Pendakur, K., & Pendakur, R. (2011). Aboriginal income disparity in Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 37(1), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Penney, C. (2013). Aboriginal Data as a Result of Changes to the 2011 Census of Population. Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada, Strategic Research/Affaires autochtones et développement du Nord Canada, La recherche stratégique.Google Scholar
  54. Quah, D. (1997). Empirics for growth and distribution: Polarization, stratification and convergence club. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shorrocks, A. F. (1983). Ranking income distributions. Economica, 50(197), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Status of Women Canada. (2005). Equality for women: Beyond the illusion. The Expert Panel on Accountability Mechanisms for Gender Equality, Final Report, December.Google Scholar
  57. Status of Women Canada. (2017). Gender equality. Status of Women Canada, Government of Canada. http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/commemoration/iwd-jif/equality-egalite-en.html.
  58. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  60. UNDP. (2016). Human development report 2016: Human development for everyone. Technical Appendix. UNDP.Google Scholar
  61. Weinstein, J. (2007). Quiet revolution west: The rebirth of Métis nationalism. Calgary: Fifth House.Google Scholar
  62. Weymark, J. A. (2003). Generalized Gini indices of equality of opportunity. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolfson, M. C. (1994). When inequalities diverge. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 353–358.Google Scholar
  64. Xie, Y., & Zhou, X. (2014). Income inequality in today’s China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(19), 6928–6933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yitzhaki, S. (1979). Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 321–324.Google Scholar
  66. Yitzhaki, S. (1994). Economic distance and overlapping of distributions. Journal of Econometrics, 61(1), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zheng, B. (2016). Almost Lorenz Dominance. University of Colorado. Denver, Discussion Paper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economics DepartmentUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations