Advertisement

Measurement and Determinants of Multidimensional Poverty: Evidence from Taiwan

  • Ke-Mei ChenEmail author
  • Chao-Hsien Leu
  • Te-Mu Wang
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Poverty is multifaceted. In this study, multiple data sources and analytical approaches were used to analyze multidimensional poverty profiles in Taiwan. The Alkire–Foster method and a multilevel modeling technique were applied to examine multidimensional poverty and multilevel factors, respectively. The resulting estimates of multidimensional poverty indicated disparate multidimensional poverty profiles for the four districts of Taiwan. This study’s findings on the multilevel determinants of multidimensional poverty demonstrate that the levels of multiple dimensions of deprivation vary across cities and counties according to microlevel factors including age, socioeconomic status, marital status, household income, and household size. At the macrolevel, level of urbanization and service-to-manufacturing ratio were found to significantly correlate with level of multidimensional poverty. Finally, the study presents the implications of these findings for antipoverty policy and provides suggestions for future research.

Keywords

Multidimensional poverty Deprivation Capability poverty Multilevel analysis Taiwan 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (Grant Nos. MOST 104-2420-H-194-008-DR and MOST 107-2410-H-020-001-). The study used the data from the National Health Interview Survey Original Database provided by the Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, National Health Research Institutes and Food and Drug Administration, and the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Finally, we appreciate the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments.

References

  1. Adeoti, A. I. (2014). Trend and determinants of multidimensional poverty in rural Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 6(5), 220–231.  https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE2013.0535.Google Scholar
  2. Alkire, S., & Apablaza, M. (2016). Multidimensional poverty in Europe 20062012: Illustrating a methodology (OPHI working paper 74). Retrieved from Oxford: http://ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-in-europe-2006-2012-illustrating-a-methodology/. Accessed 07 Apr 2019.
  3. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2007). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement (OPHI working paper 7). Retrieved from Oxford: http://www.ophi.org.uk/working-paper-number-07/. Accessed 07 Apr 2019.
  4. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006.Google Scholar
  5. Alkire, S., Foster, J. E., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015a). The Alkire–Foster counting methodology. In S. Alkire, J. E. Foster, S. Seth, M. E. Santos, J. M. Roche, & P. Ballon (Eds.), Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis (pp. 144–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Alkire, S., Foster, J. E., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015b). Introduction. In S. Alkire, J. E. Foster, S. Seth, M. E. Santos, J. M. Roche, & P. Ballon (Eds.), Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis (pp. 1–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Alkire, S., Foster, J. E., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015c). Overview of methods for multidimensional poverty assessment. In S. Alkire, J. E. Foster, S. Seth, M. E. Santos, J. M. Roche, & P. Ballon (Eds.), Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis (pp. 70–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Alkire, S., Foster, J. E., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015d). Robustness analysis and statistical inference. In S. Alkire, J. E. Foster, S. Seth, M. E. Santos, J. M. Roche, & P. Ballon (Eds.), Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis (pp. 233–255). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Alkire, S., & Roche, J. M. (2011). Beyond headcount: Measures that reflect the breadth and components of child poverty (OPHI working paper 45). Retrieved from Oxford: http://www.ophi.org.uk/new-approach-to-child-poverty/. Accessed 07 Apr 2019.
  10. Alkire, S., & Santos, M. (2013). A multidimensional approach: Poverty measurement & beyond. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 239–257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0257-3.Google Scholar
  11. Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries (OPHI working paper 38). Retrieved from Oxford: http://www.ophi.org.uk/acute-multidimensional-poverty-a-new-index-for-developing-countries/. Accessed 07 Apr 2019.
  12. Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2014). Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: Robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Development, 59, 251–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.026.Google Scholar
  13. Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 55(4), 749–764.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1911028.Google Scholar
  14. Atkinson, A. B. (2003). Multidimensional deprivation: Contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 51–65.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023903525276.Google Scholar
  15. Batana, Y. M. (2013). Multidimensional measurement of poverty among women in Sub-Saharan Africa. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 337–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0251-9.Google Scholar
  16. Battiston, D., Cruces, G., Lopez-Calva, L. F., Lugo, M. A., & Santos, M. E. (2013). Income and beyond: Multidimensional poverty in six Latin American countries. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 291–314.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0249-3.Google Scholar
  17. Belhadj, B. (2011). New fuzzy indices of poverty by distinguishing three levels of poverty. Research in Economics, 65(3), 221–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2010.10.002.Google Scholar
  18. Bennett, C. J., & Mitra, S. (2013). Multidimensional poverty: Measurement, estimation, and inference. Econometric Reviews, 32(1), 57–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2012.690331.Google Scholar
  19. Betti, G., & Verma, V. (2008). Fuzzy measures of the incidence of relative poverty and deprivation: A multi-dimensional perspective. Statistical Methods and Applications, 17(2), 225–250.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-007-0062-8.Google Scholar
  20. Bossert, W., Chakravarty, S. R., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2013). Multidimensional poverty and material deprivation with discrete data. Review of Income and Wealth, 59(1), 29–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00519.x.Google Scholar
  21. Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 25–49.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023913831342.Google Scholar
  22. Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2009). Multidimensional poverty orderings: Theory and applications. In K. Basu & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Arguments for a better world: Essays in honor of Amartya Sen. Ethics, welfare, and measurement (Vol. I, pp. 337–362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Bradshaw, J., & Finch, N. (2003). Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 32(4), 513–525.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727940300713X.Google Scholar
  24. Cerioli, A., & Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In C. Dagum & M. Zenga (Eds.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272–284). Berlin; New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Chen, K.-M., Leu, C.-H., & Wang, T.-M. (2016). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis in Taiwan. Journal of Population Studies, 53, 1–59.  https://doi.org/10.6191/JPS.2016.53.01. (published in Chinese).Google Scholar
  26. Chen, K.-M., & Wang, T.-M. (2015). Determinants of poverty status in Taiwan: A multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research, 123(2), 371–389.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0741-4.Google Scholar
  27. Costa, M., & De Angelis, L. (2008). The multidimensional measurement of poverty: A fuzzy set approach. STATISTICA, 68(3/4), 303–319.Google Scholar
  28. D’Ambrosio, C., Deutsch, J., & Silber, J. (2011). Multidimensional approaches to poverty measurement: An empirical analysis of poverty in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, based on the European panel. Applied Economics, 43(8), 951–961.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840802600129.Google Scholar
  29. Dewilde, C. (2008). Individual and institutional determinants of multidimensional poverty: A European comparison. Social Indicators Research, 86(2), 233–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9106-6.Google Scholar
  30. Duclos, J.-Y., Sahn, D. E., & Younger, S. D. (2006). Robust multidimensional poverty comparisons. The Economic Journal, 116(514), 943–968.Google Scholar
  31. European Commission. (2016). Air quality standards. Retrieved from http://www.ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm. Accessed 07 Apr 2019.
  32. Foster, J. E., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761–766.Google Scholar
  33. Guo, G., & Zhao, H. (2000). Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 441–462.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.441.Google Scholar
  34. Hong, M.-H. (2011). Should social welfare policy focus on income poverty or consumption poverty? Taiwanese Journal of Social Welfare, 10(1), 97–165.Google Scholar
  35. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York and Hove: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  36. Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. M. (2005). Multilevel analysis. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (Vol. 2, pp. 785–793). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hsueh, C. T. (2004). Examining the feminization of poverty in Taiwan: A case of 1990s. Journal of Population Studies, 29, 95–121.Google Scholar
  38. Labar, K., & Bresson, F. (2011). A multidimensional analysis of poverty in China from 1991 to 2006. China Economic Review, 22(4), 646–668.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2011.08.005.Google Scholar
  39. Lee, S.-L., & Wang, T.-M. (2008). Multi-dimensional trends of child poverty in Taiwan: Application and decomposition of the SST index. NTU Social Work Review, 18, 191–230. (published in Chinese).Google Scholar
  40. Lee, Y.-J. (2011). The dynamics of social disadvantage cumulation: A case study of Taiwan. Social Policy & Social Work, 15(1), 39–90.Google Scholar
  41. Leu, C.-H. (1996). Gender differences in poverty. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 8(2), 221–256. (published in Chinese).Google Scholar
  42. Leu, C.-H., Chen, K.-M., & Chen, H.-H. (2016). A multidimensional approach to child poverty in Taiwan. Children and Youth Services Review, 66, 35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.018.Google Scholar
  43. Levine, S., Muwonge, J., & Batana, Y. M. (2012). A robust multidimensional poverty profile for Uganda (OPHI working paper 55). Retrieved from Oxford: http://www.ophi.org.uk/a-robust-multidimensional-poverty-profile-for-uganda/. Accessed 07 Apr 2019.
  44. Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A multidimensional study. World Development, 41, 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.024.Google Scholar
  46. National Development Council. (2017). The National Development Plan 2017–2020. Taipei: National Development Council.Google Scholar
  47. Neff, D. (2013). Fuzzy set theoretic applications in poverty research. Policy and Society, 32(4), 319–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.10.004.Google Scholar
  48. Ningaye, P., & Mom Njong, A. (2014). Determinants and spatial distribution of multidimensional poverty in Cameroon. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), 91–103.  https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v3i1.619.Google Scholar
  49. Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2010). Using non-monetary deprivation indicators to analyze poverty and social exclusion: Lessons from Europe? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(2), 305–325.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20493.Google Scholar
  50. Perry, B. (2002). The mismatch between income measures and direct outcome measures of poverty. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 19, 101–127.Google Scholar
  51. Qi, D., & Wu, Y. (2015). A multidimensional child poverty index in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 159–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.08.011.Google Scholar
  52. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Santos, M. E., Villatoro, P., Mancero, X., & Gerstenfeld, P. (2015). A multidimensional poverty index for Latin America (OPHI working paper 79). Retrieved from Oxford: http://www.ophi.org.uk/a-multidimensional-poverty-index-for-latin-america/. Accessed 07 Apr 2019.
  54. Sanusi, M. M., Denis, D. M., Kumar, M., Kispotta, W., Bose, D. K., & Srivastava, S. K. (2015). Estimating multidimensional poverty and identifying poor households in Kano state. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(12), 148–157.Google Scholar
  55. Saunders, P. (2011). Down and out: Poverty and exclusion in Australia. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  56. Saunders, P., Wong, H., & Wong, W. P. (2014). Deprivation and poverty in Hong Kong. Social Policy & Administration, 48(5), 556–575.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12042.Google Scholar
  57. Sen, A. K. (1976). An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44(2), 219–231.Google Scholar
  58. Shorrocks, A. F. (1995). Revisiting the Sen poverty index. Econometrica, 63(5), 1225–1230.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2171728.Google Scholar
  59. Spicker, P. (2007). Definitions of poverty: Twelve clusters of meaning. In P. Spicker, S. A. Leguizamon, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Poverty: An international glossary (2nd ed., pp. 229–243). London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  60. Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. Berkeley: University Of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tseng, S. F., You, Y. C., & Ho, C. C. (2002). New economy, underemployment, and inadequate employment. Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society, 3, 215–237.Google Scholar
  62. Tsui, K.-Y. (2002). Multidimensional poverty indices. Social Choice and Welfare, 19(1), 69–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s355-002-8326-3.Google Scholar
  63. Waglé, U. R. (2005). Multidimensional poverty measurement with economic well-being, capability, and social inclusion: A case from Kathmandu, Nepal. Journal of Human Development, 6(3), 301–328.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500287621.Google Scholar
  64. Wang, T.-M., Ho, H.-C., & Liu, Y.-L. (2008). The effects of income growth, economic inequality and changing family structure on poverty rates: A case study from 1990 to 2004. Taiwanese Journal of Social Welfare, 7(1), 29–63. (published in Chinese).Google Scholar
  65. Wang, Y.-T., & Chen, J.-R. (2012). Child poverty in Taiwan during the global financial crisis: From the perspective of new social risks. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 22(1–2), 20–35.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2012.681142.Google Scholar
  66. Whelan, C. T., & Maître, B. (2010). Protecting the vulnerable: Poverty and social exclusion in Ireland as the economic crisis emerged. Economic and Social Review, 41(4), 501–525.Google Scholar
  67. Whelan, C. T., Nolan, B., & Maître, B. (2014). Multidimensional poverty measurement in Europe: An application of the adjusted headcount approach. Journal of European social policy, 24(2), 183–197.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928713517914.Google Scholar
  68. Yu, J. (2013). Multidimensional poverty in China: Findings based on the CHNS. Social Indicators Research, 112(2), 315–336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0250-x.Google Scholar
  69. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WorkNational Pingtung University of Science and TechnologyNeipuTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Department of Social WorkTunghai UniversityTaichungTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Social WelfareNational Chung Cheng UniversityMinhsiung TownshipTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations