Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 147, Issue 1, pp 345–359 | Cite as

Latent Character Strength Profile and Grouping Effects

  • Wenjie DuanEmail author
  • Bo Qi
  • Junrong Sheng
  • Yuhang Wang
Original Research

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that personality types may lead to different health status. The current study aims to refine a previous typological profile of strength using a heterogeneous sample (N = 5776) and clarify further the associations between strength profiles and mental wellbeing (e.g., flourishing), mental illbeing (e.g., depression, anxiety, and stress), strength knowledge, and strength use. Latent profile analysis was implemented to distinguish subgroups on the basis of the three-dimensional inventory of character strengths (e.g., self-control, inquisitiveness, and caring). Results refined previous findings and indicated three specific profiles, namely, Strength, Common, and Risk Groups. The Strength Group scored relatively high on self-control and inquisitiveness but low on caring; the Common Group scored relatively high on caring; and the Risk Group had relatively high scores on self-control. As expected, the Strength Group had the highest strength knowledge and strength use, whereas the Risk Group had the least strength knowledge and strength use. The three proposed profiles have significant differences of anxiety, stress, and flourishing; however, the difference of depression between the Strength and Risk Groups was insignificant compared with the Common Group. This study can be helpful in refining strength typologies for future effective strength-based interventions.

Keywords

Latent profile analysis Character strength Strength profile Mental health Strength-based intervention 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The Human Subjects Ethics Sub-Committee of the Department of Sociology and Wuhan University approved this study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained by click a button from the participants before they completed the survey.

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC,19(6), 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal,21(3), 329–341.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atari, M., & Yaghoubirad, M. (2016). The Big Five personality dimensions and mental health: The mediating role of alexithymia. Asian Journal of Psychiatry,24, 59–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakk, Z., & Vermunt, J. K. (2016). Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal,23(1), 20–31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.955104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology,9(2), 291.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457949700206X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird, V. J., Le, B. C., Leamy, M., Larsen, J., Oades, L. G., Williams, J., et al. (2012). Assessing the strengths of mental health consumers: A systematic review. Psychological Assessment,24(4), 1024–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bravo, A. J., Boothe, L. G., & Pearson, M. R. (2016). Getting personal with mindfulness: A latent profile analysis of mindfulness and psychological outcomes. Mindfulness,7(2), 420–432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0459-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruna, M. O., Brabete, A. C., & Izquierdo, J. M. A. (2018). Reliability generalization as a seal of quality of substantive meta-analyses: The case of the VIA inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) and their relationships to life satisfaction. Psychological Reports.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118779198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research,33(33), 261–304.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung, F. M., Van de Fons, J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist,66(7), 593–603.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement,7(3), 249.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168300700301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest A Journal of the American Psychological Society,11(2), 53–79.  https://doi.org/10.2307/41038735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology,49(3), 182–185.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duan, W. (2016). The benefits of personal strengths in mental health of stressed students: A longitudinal investigation. Quality of Life Research,25(11), 2879–2888.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1320-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duan, W., & Bu, H. (2017). Development and initial validation of a short three-dimensional inventory of character strengths. Quality of Life Research,26(9), 2519–2531.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1579-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duan, W., Bu, H., Zhao, J., & Guo, X. (2018). Examining the mediating roles of strengths knowledge and strengths use in an one-year single-session character strength-based cognitive intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0014-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duan, W., & Guo, P. (2015). Association between virtues and posttraumatic growth: Preliminary evidence from a Chinese community sample after earthquakes. Peerj,3, e883.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duan, W., Guo, P., & Gan, P. (2015). Relationships among trait resilience, virtues, post-traumatic stress disorder, and posttraumatic growth. PLoS ONE,10(5), e0125707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duan, W., & Ho, S. M. Y. (2017). Three-dimensional model of strengths: Examination of invariance across gender, age, education levels, and marriage status. Community Mental Health Journal,53(2), 233–240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-016-0038-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duan, W., Ho, S. M. Y., Yu, B., Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, T., et al. (2012). Factor structure of the chinese virtues questionnaire. Research on Social Work Practice,22(6), 680–688.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731512450074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duan, W., Li, J., & Mu, W. (2017). Psychometric characteristics of strengths knowledge scale and strengths use scale among adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917705593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duan, W., & Wang, Y. (2018). Latent profile analysis of the three-dimensional model of character strengths to distinguish at-strengths and at-risk populations. Quality of Life Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1933-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duan, W., & Xie, D. (2016). Measuring adolescent flourishing: Psychometric properties of flourishing scale in a sample of chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916655504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dziak, J. J., Bray, B. C., Zhang, J., Zhang, M., & Lanza, S. T. (2016). Comparing the performance of improved classify-analyze approaches for distal outcomes in latent profile analysis. Methodology European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral & Social Sciences,12(4), 107.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferguson, E. (2013). Personality is of central concern to understand health: Towards a theoretical model for health psychology. Health Psychology Review,7(sup1), S32–S70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.547985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Friedman, H. S. (2008). The multiple linkages of personality and disease. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity,22(5), 668–675.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2007.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology,9(2), 103–110.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,78(6), 1135–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Govindji, R., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review,2(2), 143–153.Google Scholar
  30. Hampson, S. E., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Personality and health: A lifespan perspective handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 770–794). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Haridas, S., Bhullar, N., & Dunstan, D. A. (2017). What’s in character strengths? Profiling strengths of the heart and mind in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences,113, 32–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ho, S. M. Y., Rochelle, T. L., Law, L. S. C., Duan, W., Bai, Y., & Shih, S. M. (2014). Methodological Issues in Positive Psychology Research with Diverse Populations: Exploring Strengths Among Chinese Adults. In J. T. Pedrotti & L. M. Edwards (Eds.), Perspectives on the intersection of multiculturalism & positive psychology (pp. 45–57). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoerger, M., Coletta, M., Sörensen, S., Chapman, B. P., Kaukeinen, K., Tu, X., et al. (2016). Personality and perceived health in spousal caregivers of patients with lung cancer: The roles of neuroticism and extraversion. Journal of aging research,2016, 5659793.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5659793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Joseph, S., & Wood, A. (2010). Assessment of positive functioning in clinical psychology: Theoretical and practical issues. Clinical Psychology Review,30(7), 830.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis (Press release).Google Scholar
  36. Lanza, S. T., & Rhoades, B. L. (2013). Latent class analysis: An alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prevention Science,14(2), 157–168.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0201-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, T., Duan, W., & Guo, P. (2017). Character strengths, social anxiety, and physiological stress reactivity. Peerj,5, e3396.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu, X., Lv, Y., Ma, Q., Guo, F., Yan, X., & Ji, L. (2016). The basic features and patterns of character strengths among children and adolescents in China. Studies of Psychology & Behavior,27(5), 536–542.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lo, Y. T., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika,88(3), 767–778.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety and stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychological Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Manikam, R. (2002). Mental health of children and adolescents. In N. N. Singh, T. H. Ollendick, & A. N. Singh (Eds.), International perspectives on child and adolescent mental health (Vol. 2, pp. 1–36). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  42. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling,16(2), 191–225.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mcgrath, R. E. (2015). Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. Journal of Positive Psychology,10(5), 407–424.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the five factor model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences,51(8), 915–919.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology,55, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998). reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology,49(1), 229–258.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moran, C. M., Diefendorff, J. M., Kim, T. Y., & Liu, Z. Q. (2012). A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior,81(3), 354–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality,41(6), 1213–1233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nurius, P. S., & Macy, R. J. (2008). Heterogeneity among violence-exposed women: applying person-oriented research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,23(3), 389–415.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507312297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,14(4), 535–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). After the disaster: Using the big-five to predict changes in mental health among survivors of the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Disaster Prevention and Management,22(5), 456–466.  https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-09-2013-0161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Otonari, J., Nagano, J., Morita, M., Budhathoki, S., Tashiro, N., Toyomura, K., et al. (2012). Neuroticism and extraversion personality traits, health behaviours, and subjective well-being: the Fukuoka Study (Japan). Quality of Life Research,21(10), 1847–1855.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0098-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ovejero, M., Brabete, A., & Alvarado, J. (2017). I can’t get no satisfaction: Measurement invariance and gender differences in the spanish version of the satisfaction with life scale. In Paper presented at the fifth world congress on positive psychology, Montreal.Google Scholar
  54. Park, N. (2004). Character strengths and positive youth development. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,591(1), 40–54.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence,29(6), 891–909.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,23(5), 603–619.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths use as a predictor of well-being and health-related quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies,12(1), 153–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9181-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013a). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being? The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. Journal of Positive Psychology,8(3), 222–232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.777767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013b). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies,14(1), 275–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Proyer, R. T., Wellenzohn, S., Gander, F., & Ruch, W. (2015). Toward a better understanding of what makes positive psychology interventions work: predicting happiness and depression from the person × intervention fit in a follow-up after 3.5 years. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being,7(1), 108–128.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Quinlan, D., Swain, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies,13(6), 1145–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ramaswamy, V., Desarbo, W. S., Reibstein, D. J., & Robinson, W. T. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science,12(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science,2(4), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ruch, W., Weber, M., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2014). Character strengths in children and adolescents reliability and initial validity of the german values in action inventory of strengths for youth (German VIA-Youth). European Journal of Psychological Assessment,30(1), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2011). The general factor of personality. In S. V. S. T. Chamorro-Premuzic & A. A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 132–161). London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  66. Ryff, C. D., Dienberg Love, G., Urry, H. L., Muller, D., Rosenkranz, M. A., Friedman, E. M., et al. (2006). Psychological Well-Being and Ill-Being: Do They Have Distinct or Mirrored Biological Correlates? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,75(2), 85–95.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000090892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics,6(2), págs. 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika,52(3), 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Seligman, M. E. P. (2015). Chris Peterson’s unfinished masterwork: The real mental illnesses. Journal of Positive Psychology,10(1), 3–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.888582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smidt, W., Kammermeyer, G., & Roux, S. (2015). Relations between the big five personality traits of prospective early childhood pedagogues and their beliefs about the education of preschool children: Evidence from a German study. Learning and Individual Differences,37, 96–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Strickhouser, J. E., Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2017). Does personality predict health and well-being? A metasynthesis. Health Psychology: Official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association,36(8), 797–810.  https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Suh, H., Gnilka, P. B., & Rice, K. G. (2017). Perfectionism and well-being: A positive psychology framework. Personality and Individual Differences,111, 25–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tang, X., Duan, W., Wang, Z., & Liu, T. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of flourishing scale. Research on Social Work Practice,26(5), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514557832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Toner, E., Haslam, N., Robinson, J., & Williams, P. (2012). Character strengths and wellbeing in adolescence: Structure and correlates of the values in action inventory of strengths for children. Personality and Individual Differences,52(5), 637–642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. World Health Organization, W. (2018). World Mental Health Day 2018. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/world-mental-health-day/2018/en/.
  76. Yoo, J. P., & Ahn, J. (2017). Understanding the typologies of child subjective well-being: A cross-country comparison. Children and Youth Services Review.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang, W., Wang, A.-N., Yao, S.-Y., Luo, Y.-H., Li, Z.-H., Huang, F.-F., et al. (2016). Latent profiles of posttraumatic growth and their relation to differences in resilience among only-child-lost people in China. PLoS ONE,11(12), e0167398.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social and Public Administration SchoolEast China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Management and EconomicsXi’an Technological UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of SociologyWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of SociologyUniversity of Notre DameSouth BendUSA

Personalised recommendations