Latent Character Strength Profile and Grouping Effects
- 56 Downloads
Previous studies have shown that personality types may lead to different health status. The current study aims to refine a previous typological profile of strength using a heterogeneous sample (N = 5776) and clarify further the associations between strength profiles and mental wellbeing (e.g., flourishing), mental illbeing (e.g., depression, anxiety, and stress), strength knowledge, and strength use. Latent profile analysis was implemented to distinguish subgroups on the basis of the three-dimensional inventory of character strengths (e.g., self-control, inquisitiveness, and caring). Results refined previous findings and indicated three specific profiles, namely, Strength, Common, and Risk Groups. The Strength Group scored relatively high on self-control and inquisitiveness but low on caring; the Common Group scored relatively high on caring; and the Risk Group had relatively high scores on self-control. As expected, the Strength Group had the highest strength knowledge and strength use, whereas the Risk Group had the least strength knowledge and strength use. The three proposed profiles have significant differences of anxiety, stress, and flourishing; however, the difference of depression between the Strength and Risk Groups was insignificant compared with the Common Group. This study can be helpful in refining strength typologies for future effective strength-based interventions.
KeywordsLatent profile analysis Character strength Strength profile Mental health Strength-based intervention
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The Human Subjects Ethics Sub-Committee of the Department of Sociology and Wuhan University approved this study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Written informed consent was obtained by click a button from the participants before they completed the survey.
- Bruna, M. O., Brabete, A. C., & Izquierdo, J. M. A. (2018). Reliability generalization as a seal of quality of substantive meta-analyses: The case of the VIA inventory of strengths (VIA-IS) and their relationships to life satisfaction. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118779198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest A Journal of the American Psychological Society,11(2), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/41038735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dziak, J. J., Bray, B. C., Zhang, J., Zhang, M., & Lanza, S. T. (2016). Comparing the performance of improved classify-analyze approaches for distal outcomes in latent profile analysis. Methodology European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral & Social Sciences,12(4), 107. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Govindji, R., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review,2(2), 143–153.Google Scholar
- Hampson, S. E., & Friedman, H. S. (2008). Personality and health: A lifespan perspective handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 770–794). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ho, S. M. Y., Rochelle, T. L., Law, L. S. C., Duan, W., Bai, Y., & Shih, S. M. (2014). Methodological Issues in Positive Psychology Research with Diverse Populations: Exploring Strengths Among Chinese Adults. In J. T. Pedrotti & L. M. Edwards (Eds.), Perspectives on the intersection of multiculturalism & positive psychology (pp. 45–57). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoerger, M., Coletta, M., Sörensen, S., Chapman, B. P., Kaukeinen, K., Tu, X., et al. (2016). Personality and perceived health in spousal caregivers of patients with lung cancer: The roles of neuroticism and extraversion. Journal of aging research,2016, 5659793. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5659793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis (Press release).Google Scholar
- Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety and stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychological Foundation.Google Scholar
- Manikam, R. (2002). Mental health of children and adolescents. In N. N. Singh, T. H. Ollendick, & A. N. Singh (Eds.), International perspectives on child and adolescent mental health (Vol. 2, pp. 1–36). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling,16(2), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology,55, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Otonari, J., Nagano, J., Morita, M., Budhathoki, S., Tashiro, N., Toyomura, K., et al. (2012). Neuroticism and extraversion personality traits, health behaviours, and subjective well-being: the Fukuoka Study (Japan). Quality of Life Research,21(10), 1847–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0098-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ovejero, M., Brabete, A., & Alvarado, J. (2017). I can’t get no satisfaction: Measurement invariance and gender differences in the spanish version of the satisfaction with life scale. In Paper presented at the fifth world congress on positive psychology, Montreal.Google Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013a). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being? The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. Journal of Positive Psychology,8(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.777767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013b). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies,14(1), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Wellenzohn, S., Gander, F., & Ruch, W. (2015). Toward a better understanding of what makes positive psychology interventions work: predicting happiness and depression from the person × intervention fit in a follow-up after 3.5 years. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being,7(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science,2(4), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2011). The general factor of personality. In S. V. S. T. Chamorro-Premuzic & A. A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 132–161). London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Ryff, C. D., Dienberg Love, G., Urry, H. L., Muller, D., Rosenkranz, M. A., Friedman, E. M., et al. (2006). Psychological Well-Being and Ill-Being: Do They Have Distinct or Mirrored Biological Correlates? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,75(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1159/000090892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smidt, W., Kammermeyer, G., & Roux, S. (2015). Relations between the big five personality traits of prospective early childhood pedagogues and their beliefs about the education of preschool children: Evidence from a German study. Learning and Individual Differences,37, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Toner, E., Haslam, N., Robinson, J., & Williams, P. (2012). Character strengths and wellbeing in adolescence: Structure and correlates of the values in action inventory of strengths for children. Personality and Individual Differences,52(5), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization, W. (2018). World Mental Health Day 2018. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/world-mental-health-day/2018/en/.
- Zhang, W., Wang, A.-N., Yao, S.-Y., Luo, Y.-H., Li, Z.-H., Huang, F.-F., et al. (2016). Latent profiles of posttraumatic growth and their relation to differences in resilience among only-child-lost people in China. PLoS ONE,11(12), e0167398. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar