Inequality of Opportunity in Indian Women
- 412 Downloads
Inequality of opportunity (IOp) in any society is defined as that part of overall inequality which arises from factors beyond the control of an individual (circumstances) such as parental education, caste, gender, religion etc. and is thus considered unfair and is against the meritocratic values of a society. Hence, it needs to be controlled and compensated. We estimate the IOp in economic outcomes among Indian women by using the nationally representative India Human Development Survey 2011–2012. We include parental education, caste, religion and region of birth as circumstances. The overall IOp in income ranges from 18–25% and 16–21% (of total income inequality) in urban and rural areas, respectively. The corresponding figures for consumption expenditure are 16–22% and 20–23% in urban and rural areas, respectively. We also estimate the partial contributions of the circumstances to the overall IOp. We find that the parental education is the most significant contributor to IOp in urban areas, whereas, region of birth is the most significant contributor to IOp in rural areas. Fortunately, findings imply that socially and culturally imbedded factors like caste and religion which are more persistent do contribute to the IOp, but, the largest contribution is due to factors like parental education and region which can be relatively easily tackled and addressed with policy interventions.
KeywordsInequality of opportunity Indian women Income Consumption expenditure India
The authors would like to thank Ashish Dangi and Ram Kumar for providing suggestions and comments on earlier drafts.
- Barros, R. P., Ferreira, F. H. G., Vega, J. R. M., & Chanduvi, J. S. (2009). Measuring inequality of opportunities in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Palgrave Macmillan and The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Bhat, P. M., & Zavier, F. (1999). Findings of national family health survey: Regional analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, 3008–3032.Google Scholar
- Brunori, P (2016). How to measure inequality of opportunity: A hands-on guide? Life Course Centre working paper series no 2016-04. Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- Callen, T. (2007). PPP versus the market: Which weight matters? Finance and Development, 44(1), 50.Google Scholar
- Checchi, D., V. Peragine, & Serlenga, L. (2010). Fair and unfair income inequalities in Europe. ECINEQ working paper 174, Society for Study of Economic Inequality.Google Scholar
- Dabla-Norris, M. E., Kochhar, M. K., Suphaphiphat, M. N., Ricka, M. F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
- Desai, S., Dubey, A. &Vanneman, R. (2015). India human development survey-II (IHDS-II), 2011–12. ICPSR36151-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
- Ferreira, F., & Gignoux, J. (2008). The measurement of inequality of opportunity: Theory and an application to Latin America. World Bank Policy research working paper no. 4659. New York: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Government of India. (2006). Social economic and educational status of muslim community in India. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
- Jayaraj, D., & Subramanian, S. (2013). On the inter-group inclusiveness of India’s consumption expenditure growth. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(10), 65–70.Google Scholar
- Jayaraj, D., & Subramanian, S. (2015). Growth and inequality in the distribution of India’s consumption expenditure 1983 to 2009–2010. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(32), 39–47.Google Scholar
- Luo, X., & Zhu, N. (2008). Rising income inequality in China: A race to the top. Policy Research working paper no. 4700. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Marrero, G., & Rodríguez, J. G. (2011). Inequality of opportunity in the United States: Trends and decomposition. In J. Bishop (Ed.), Inequality of opportunity: Theory and measurement (research on economic inequality) (Vol. 19, pp. 217–246). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Motiram, S., & Singh, A. (2012). How close does the apple fall to the tree? Some estimates on intergenerational occupational mobility for India. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(40), 56–65.Google Scholar
- Motiram, S., & Vakulabharanam, V. (2012). Indian inequality: patterns and changes, 1993 – 2010. India development report. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2015). OECD education at a glance. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/edu/education-at-a-glance-2015.htm.
- Ostry, J. D., & Berg, A. (2011). Inequality and unsustainable growth; two sides of the same coin? (No. 11/08). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
- Pathak, P. K., & Singh, A. (2009). Geographical variation in poverty and child malnutrition in India. In Population, poverty and health: Analytical approaches (pp. 183–206). New Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
- Peterskovsky, L., & Schüller, M. (2010). China and India—The new growth engines of the global economy? GIGA focus international edition English, (04). Chennai: GIDA Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
- Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2000). Intrahousehold allocation and gender relations: New empirical evidence from four developing countries. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Roemer, J. E. (1993). A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 22(2), 146–166.Google Scholar
- Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of opportunity (No. 331.2/R62e). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Roemer, J. E. (2006). Economic development as opportunity equalization. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, No 1583, Yale University.Google Scholar
- Singh, A. (2012b). Inequality of opportunity in access to primary education among Indian children. Population Review, 51(1), 50–68.Google Scholar
- Suárez Álvarez, A., & López Menéndez, A. J. (2018b). Income inequality and inequality of opportunity in Europe. Are they on the rise. In J. Bishop, & J. Gabriel (Eds.), Inequality, taxation and intergenerational transmission, Vol: 26 (Research on Economic Inequality Series).Google Scholar
- Suárez Álvarez, A., & López Menéndez, A. J. (2018c). Inequality of opportunity in developing countries: Does the income aggregate matter? LIS WP 2018-739. Available in http://www.lisdatacenter.org/.
- Subramanian, S., & Jayaraj, D. (2016). The quintile income statistic, money-metric poverty, and disequalising growth in India: 1983 to 2011–12. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(5), 73–79.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2015). 17 goals to transform our world: Sustainable development goals. Retrieve at http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
- Vakulabharanam, V. (2010). Does class matter? Class structure and worsening inequality in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(29), 67–76.Google Scholar
- Weisskopf, T. E. (2011). Why worry about inequality in the booming Indian economy? Economic and Political Weekly, 46(47), 41–51.Google Scholar