Advertisement

Wellbeing as Emergent from the Leveraging of Polarities: Harnessing Component Interdependencies

  • Lance NeweyEmail author
  • Rui Torres de Oliveira
Original Research
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

The starting premise of this article is that within existing approaches the nature of the interrelationship between components of wellbeing is both under-conceptualized and under-measured. This paper contrasts three perspectives of wellbeing component interrelationship. The first and most common is a hierarchical approach, which prioritizes economic wellbeing and uses this to fund attainment of other components of wellbeing, such as social and environmental. A second perspective, which we call aggregation approaches, list dashboards of wellbeing components and average them. Both of these approaches emphasize the dependence and independence of the underlying components respectively. In this paper we develop a conceptualization of wellbeing based on the interdependence of eight components: economic, environmental, social, cultural, psychological, physical, spiritual and cultural. Our theory of interdependence is a multarity-based view of wellbeing which sees the latter as emerging from the integrated leveraging of at least four fundamental polarities: economic and environmental, physical and psychological, material and spiritual and social and cultural. Wellbeing costs increase and value creation opportunities lost when interdependence between components is ignored.

Keywords

Wellbeing Components Interdependence Polarities Leveraging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express sincere gratitude to Leslie DePol and Susan Dupre from Polarity Partnerships for their invaluable insights and expertise in all things polarity. The paper benefitted greatly from their feedback.

References

  1. Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, R. (2008). A survey of composite indices measuring country performance: 2008 update. Working paper. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme, Office of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2017). Twenty-five years of materialism: Do the US and Europe diverge? Social Indicators Research, 133, 787–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bithas, K., & Kalimeris, P. (2017). The material intensity of growth: Implications from the human scale of production. Social Indicators Research, 133, 1011–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleys, B. (2012). Beyond GDP: Classifying alternative measures for progress. Social Indicators Research, 109, 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callicott, J. B. (1996). Environmental wellness. Literature and Medicine, 15(1), 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciommi, M., Gentili, A., Ermini, B., Gigliarano, C., Chelli, F. M., & Gallegati, M. (2017). Have your cake and eat it too: The well-being of the Italians (1861–2011). Social Indicators Research, 134, 473–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, M. (2005). Assessing well-being using hierarchical needs. United Nations University: World Institute for Development Economics Research, Research Paper No.: 2005/22.Google Scholar
  10. Cook-Greuter, S. R. (2004). Making the case for a developmental perspective. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36, 275–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cortright, B. (1997). Psychotherapy and spirit: Theory and practice in transpersonal psychotherapy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A., & Weinberg, M. K. (2015). Multi-item measurement of subjective wellbeing: Subjective approaches. In W. Glatzer, et al. (Eds.), Global handbook of quality of life: Exploration of well-being of nations and continents. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. De Graaf, J., Wann, D., & Naylor, T. H. (2014). Affluenza: How over-consumption is killing us—and how to fight back (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  14. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100, 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Wissing, M. P., & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2013). Sources and motives for personal meaning in adulthood. Journal of Positive Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830761.Google Scholar
  16. Deneulin, S., & McGregor, J. A. (2010). The capability approach and the politics of a social conception of wellbeing. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(4), 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of need. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89, 89–125.Google Scholar
  20. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three political economies of the welfare state. International Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 92–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations. Discussion paper 2004/06. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
  22. Gasper, D. (2005). Subjective and objective well-being in relation to economic inputs: Puzzles and responses. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gidley, J. (2007). The evolution of consciousness as a planetary imperative: An integration of integral views. Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary and Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research and Praxis, 5, 4–226.Google Scholar
  24. Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need: Climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen vivir: Today’s tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., Abdallah, S., Seaford, C., & Mahony, S. (2012). Review report on beyond GDP indicators: Categorisation, intensions and impacts. BRAINPOOL deliverable 1.1, Final version, 18 October 2012.Google Scholar
  27. Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well-being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 1(2), 137–164.Google Scholar
  28. Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index (5th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, B. (2014). Polarity management: Identifying and managing unsolvable problems. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, B. (forthcoming). AND: How to leverage polarity/paradox/dilemma. Advance draft copy direct from Author.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, T. M., & Felps, W. (2013). Shareholder wealth maximization and social welfare: A utilitarian critique. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2), 207–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King, M., Speck, P., & Thomas, A. (2001). The royal free interview for religious and spiritual beliefs: Development and validation of a self-report version. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1015–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lajoie, D. H., & Shapiro, S. I. (1992). Definitions of transpersonal psychology: The first twenty-three years. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 24(1), 79–98.Google Scholar
  37. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  38. Massoli, P., Mazziotta, M., Pareto, A., & Rinaldelli, C. (2014). Indici compositi per il BES. Giornate della Ricerca 10–11 Novembre 2014. Roma: Istat.Google Scholar
  39. Max-Neef, M. (1995). Economic growth and quality of life: A threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 15, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). A non-compensatory composite index for measuring well-being over time. Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4, 93–104.Google Scholar
  41. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2016). On a generalized non-compensatory composite index for measuring socio-economic phenomena. Social Indicators Research, 127, 983–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCauley, C. D., Drath, W. H., Palus, C. J., O’Connor, P. M. G., & Baker, B. A. (2006). The use of constructive-developmental theory to advance the understanding of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 634–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKeown, T. (1988). The origins of human disease. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. MacNeill, J. (1988). Strategies for sustainable economic development, Scientific American, September, 155–165.Google Scholar
  45. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. ‎Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en.Google Scholar
  47. Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pargament, K. I. & Sweeney, P. J. (2011). Building spiritual fitness in the army: An innovative approach to a vital aspect of human development (pp. 58–64), American Psychologist.Google Scholar
  49. Patrizii, V., Pettini, A., & Resce, G. (2017). The cost of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 133, 985–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pepper, D. (1996). Modern environmentalism: An introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Perry, B. (2009). Non-income measures of material wellbeing and hardship: First results from the 2008 New Zealand living standards survey with international comparisons. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.Google Scholar
  52. Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—Spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sawatzky, R., Ratner, P. A., & Chiu, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between spirituality and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 72, 153–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Segre, E., Rondinella, T., & Mascherini, M. (2011). Well-being in Italian regions. Measures, civil society and evidence. Social Indicators Research, 102, 47–69.Google Scholar
  56. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Smale, B., & O'Rourke, D. (2018). Capturing quality of life with the Canadian Index of Wellbeing. Public Sector Digest.Google Scholar
  58. Steffen, W., Persson, A., Deutsch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., et al. (2011). The anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio, 40, 739–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A. and Fitoussi, J-P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. In The report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  60. Torjman, S. (2004). Culture and recreation: Links to well-being. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
  61. Van den Bergh, J. (2009). The GDP paradox. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Zanden, J. L., Baten, J., d’Ercole, M. M., Rijpma, A., Smith, C., & Timmer, M. (2014). How was life? Global well-being since 1820. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264214262-en.Google Scholar
  63. Villalba, U. (2013). Buen Vivir vs Development: A paradigm shift in the Andes? Third World Quarterly, 34(8), 1427–1442.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.831594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vincent, N., Ward, L., & Denson, L. (2015). Promoting post-conventional consciousness in leaders: Australian community leadership programs. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Welzel, C., Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2003). The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 341–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the world health organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilber, K. (2006). Integral spirituality: A startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. Boston, MA: Shambala.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Queensland Business SchoolUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations