Advertisement

Measurement and Determinants of Quality of Life of Older Adults in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • Nam Xuan Vo
  • Trung Quang Vo
  • Somtip Watanapongvanich
  • Nopphol Witvorapong
Article
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

This study represents the first study using Vietnamese data that is based on the World Health Organization’s quality of life instrument—the older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD). With the instrument, the study measures quality of life of a sample of 442 older adults living in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, in 2015. It evaluates the instrument’s psychometric properties and identifies determinants of quality of life. The results suggest that the level of quality of life of older adults in Ho Chi Minh City was quite high, with the total transformed score (scaled between 0 and 100) of 76.62 ± 10.16. The Vietnamese version of the WHOQOL-OLD module shows internal consistency with a high overall Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient and high corrected item-total correlations, construct validity with a reasonable goodness of fit based on a six-factor Confirmatory Factor Analysis model, and content validity with statistically significant facet–facet and item-facet correlation coefficients. Using Ordinary Least Squares and Tobit models, quality of life of older adults in Ho Chi Minh City is found to be associated negatively with age, education, and the number of difficulties with activities of daily living, and associated positively with perceived income adequacy (i.e., whether an older person considered his/her income to be sufficient). The analyses suggest that interventions related to improvements of functional health and standard of living could enhance quality of life in old age in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Keywords

Vietnam Elderly Quality of life Reliability Validity WHOQOL-OLD 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff at the Department of Health—Ho Chi Minh City and the teaching staff at the Department of Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, for their assistance in the data collection process. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Manika Wisessathorn, Dr. Benjamas Suksatit, and the four anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Ethical standard

The research protocol used in this study was approved by the Science and Ethics Council in Biomedical Research at the Department of Health—Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, on April 20, 2015.

References

  1. Biljon, V. L., Nel, P., & Roos, V. (2015). A partial validation of the WHOQOL-OLD in a sample of older people in South Africa. Global Health Action, 8(1), 28209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjelland, I., Krokstad, S., Mykletun, A., Dahl, A. A., Tell, G. S., & Tambs, K. (2008). Does a higher educational level protect against anxiety and depression? The HUNT study. Social Science and Medicine, 66(6), 1334–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowling, A., & Gabriel, Z. (2007). Lay theories of quality of life in older age. Ageing & Society, 27(6), 827–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conrad, I., Matschinger, H., Riedel-Heller, S., von Gottberg, C., & Kilian, R. (2014). The psychometric properties of the German version of the WHOQOL-OLD in the German population aged 60 and older. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eser, S., Saatli, G., Eser, E., Baydur, H., & Fidaner, C. (2010). The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument—older adults module (WHOQOL-Old). Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 21(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  6. Fang, J., Power, M., Lin, Y., Zhang, J., Hao, Y., & Chatterji, S. (2012). Development of short versions for the WHOQOL-OLD module. The Gerontologist, 52(1), 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gobbens, R. J. J., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Dutch WHOQOL-OLD. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. González-Celis, A. L., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2013). Quality of life in the elderly: Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-OLD module in Mexico. Health, 5(12), 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ha, N. T., Duy, H. T., Le, N. H., Khanal, V., & Moorin, R. (2014). Quality of life among people living with hypertension in a rural Vietnam community. BMC Public Health, 14(1), 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halvorsrud, L., Kalfoss, M., & Diseth, Å. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Norwegian WHOQOL-OLD module. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 22(2), 292–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
  12. Huong, N. T., Ha, L. T. H., Chi, N. T. Q., Hill, P. S., & Walton, T. (2012). Exploring quality of life among the elderly in Hai Duong province, Vietnam: A rural–urban dialogue. Global Health Action, 5(1), 18874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, T. W., Ko, I. S., & Lee, K. J. (2006). Health promotion behaviors and quality of life among community-dwelling elderly in Korea: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, K., Kay, N. S., & Nokkaew, N. (2009). The performance of the World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF in assessing the quality of life of Thai college students. Social Indicators Research, 90, 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, R., Wu, S., Hao, Y., Gu, J., Fang, J., Cai, N., et al. (2013). The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): Psychometric evaluation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Low, G., Molzahn, A. E., & Schopflocher, D. (2013). Attitudes to aging mediate the relationship between older peoples’ subjective health and quality of life in 20 countries. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lucas-Carrasco, R., Laidlaw, K., & Power, M. J. (2011). Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD for Spanish older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 15(5), 595–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Minh, H. V., Ng, N., Byass, P., & Wall, S. (2012). Patterns of subjective quality of life among older adults in rural Vietnam and Indonesia. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 12(3), 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mugomeri, E., Chatanga, P., Khetheng, T. E., & Dhemba, J. (2017). Quality of life of the elderly receiving old age pension in Lesotho. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 29(4), 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nilsson, J., Rana, A. M., & Kabir, Z. N. (2006). Social capital and quality of life in old age: Results from a cross-sectional study in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Aging and Health, 18(3), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nilsson, J., Rana, A. M., Luong, D. H., Winblad, B., & Kabir, Z. N. (2012). Health-related quality of life in old age: A comparison between rural areas in Bangladesh and Vietnam. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 24(4), 610–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Power, M., Quinn, K., & Schmidt, S. (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2197–2214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prince, M. J., Wu, F., Guo, Y., Robledo, L. M. G., O’Donnell, M., Sullivan, R., et al. (2015). The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. The Lancet, 385(9967), 549–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Santor, D. A., Haggerty, J. L., Lévesque, J.-F., Burge, F., Beaulieu, M.-D., Gass, D., et al. (2011). An overview of confirmatory factor analysis and item response analysis applied to instruments to evaluate primary healthcare. Healthcare Policy, 7, 79–92.Google Scholar
  26. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  27. Shetty, P. (2012). Grey matter: Ageing in developing countries. The Lancet, 379(9823), 1285–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simões, C., & Santos, S. (2014). Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Escala Pessoal de Resultados. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 1065–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, A. E., Sim, J., Scharf, T., & Phillipson, C. (2004). Determinants of quality of life amongst older people in deprived neighbourhoods. Aging & Society, 24, 793–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Soh, S.-E., Morris, M. E., & McGinley, J. L. (2011). Determinants of health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 17, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., Galas, A., Zawisza, K., Chatterji, S., Haro, J. M., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., et al. (2017). Gender-related differences in the multi-pathway effect of social determinants on quality of life in older age—the COURAGE in Europe project. Quality of Life Research, 26, 1865–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trentini, C. M., Chachamovich, E., Wagner, G. P., Müller, D. H., Hirakata, V. N., & de Almeida Fleck, M. P. (2011). Quality of life (QoL) in a Brazilian sample of older adults: The role of sociodemographic variables and depression symptoms. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(3), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. United Nations (UN). (2015). World population prospects—The 2015 revision: Key findings and advance tables. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  34. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (2016). Rapid population ageing in Viet Nam: Challenges and opportunities. Ha Noi: UNFPA Viet Nam Country Office.Google Scholar
  35. Vameghi, R., Niksirat, Z., Hatamizadeh, N., & Kazemnejad, A. (2012). Health-related quality of life in retired older people in Tehran City. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 31(2), 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vilar, M., Sousa, L. B., & Simões, M. R. (2016). The European Portuguese WHOQOL-OLD module and the new facet Family/Family life: Reliability and validity studies. Quality of Life Research, 25(9), 2367–2372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wada, T., Ishine, M., Sakagami, T., Kita, T., Okumiya, K., Mizuno, K., et al. (2005). Depression, activities of daily living, and quality of life of community-dwelling elderly in three Asian countries: Indonesia, Vietnam, and Japan. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 41(3), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Witvorapong, N. (2015). The relationship between upstream intergenerational transfers and wealth of older adults: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Population Research, 32(3–4), 215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. World Bank. (2018). Country and lending groups: country classification. World Bank. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups. Accessed 25 March 2018.
  40. World Health Organization (WHO). (2006). The WHOQOL-OLD module–manual. Copenhagen: World Health Organization European Office.Google Scholar
  41. World Health Organization Quality of Life Group (WHOQOL Group). (1996). What Quality of life? World health forum, 17(4), 354–356.Google Scholar
  42. World Health Organization Quality of Life Group (WHOQOL Group). (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social, Economic and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of PharmacyMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Pharmacy Administration, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  3. 3.Faculty of EconomicsChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations