Assessing Euro 2020 Strategy Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: VIKOR and TOPSIS
- 194 Downloads
The European Union (EU) 2020 Strategy aims at forming the conditions for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth targets. Assessment of the EU countries’ situation is of vital importance in attaining the EU 2020 Strategy. This paper presents an impartial evaluation of the performance of 27 EU member countries in terms of each EU 2020 Strategy. For the basis of the evaluation, we propose an effective and easily practicable measure for ranking and monitoring the countries according to their performance by using the VIKOR and the TOPSIS methods, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, which allows for the integration of the 22 indicators, and be capable of considering such a broad spectrum of criteria including various economic, financial, demographic, educational and innovational. Our study provides a comparative analysis of the above-two methods. The contribution of the study to the literature is that these methods can be applied for assessing countries in terms of the EU 2020 Strategy which have the multi–dimensionality targets. The results point out new EU member countries such as Slovenia and Romania have attained higher scores than many of the 15 EU countries.
KeywordsEU 2020 strategy EU growth priorities and targets Multi-criteria decision making
- Barroso, J. M. (2010). Europe: 2020. Presentation to the informal European council of 11 February 2010, Brussels.Google Scholar
- Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). Multi-objective decision making with a large number of objectives. An application for Europe 2020. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 67–79.Google Scholar
- Codogno, L., Odinet, G., & Padrini, F. (2009). The use of targets in the Lisbon strategy. Economic Focus, 14. Rome: Ministry of Economy and Finance.Google Scholar
- Demirel, N. Ç., & Yucenur, G. N. (2011). The cruise port place selection problem with extended VIKOR and ANP methodologies under fuzzy environment. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (Vol. 2).Google Scholar
- Dincer, S. E. (2011). Multi-criteria analysis of economic activity for European Union member states and candidate countries: TOPSIS and WSA Application. European Journal of Social Sciences, 21(4), 563–572.Google Scholar
- Europe 2020 Strategy. (2010). Communication from the commission Europe 2020 a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm. Accessed 14 Feb 2017.
- European Commission. (2017). EUROSTAT database. Cited 26.05.2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/europe-2020-indicators/europe-2020-strategy.
- Fischer, S., Gran, S., Hacker, B., Jakobi, A. P., Petzold, S., Pusch, T., et al. (2010). Europe 2020: Proposals for the post-Lisbon strategy. International policy analysis. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
- Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/405566708255.
- Graells, A. S. (2015). Public procurement and the EU competition rules (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 9781782259992.Google Scholar
- Gros, D., & Roth, F. (2012). The Europe 2020 strategy can it maintain the EU’s competitiveness in the world? Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels.Google Scholar
- Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2012). Data mining concepts and techniques (3rd ed.). Elsevier: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
- Inan, A., (2005). Avrupa Birliği ekonomik yaklaşımı: Lizbon stratejisi ve maastricht kriterleri. Bankacılar Dergisi, 52, ISSN 13-0217.Google Scholar
- International Monetary Fund. (2017). World economic outlook database. Cited 20.04.2017. https://www.imf.org/en/Data.
- Kaya, P., Cetin, Eİ., & Kuruuzum, A. (2011). ÇKKV ile Avrupa Birliği ve aday ülkelerin yaşam kalitesinin analizi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 13, 80–94.Google Scholar
- Kontolomis, Z. (2003). Exchange rates are a matter of common concern: Policies in the run-up to the euro? European Commission, Directorate- General Economic and financial affairs. Economic Papers, ISSN 1725-3187, No: 191.Google Scholar
- Mir, M. A., Ghazvinei, P. T., Sulaiman, N. M. N., Basri, N. E. A., Saheri, S., Mahmood, N. Z., et al. (2016). Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 109–115.Google Scholar
- Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2011). The EU 2020 poverty target. Amsterdam, AIAS, GINI Discussion Paper 19.Google Scholar
- Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.Google Scholar
- Ozden, Ü. H. (2012). AB’ye üye ülkelerin ve Türkiye’nin ekonomik performanslarına göre VIKOR yöntemi ile sıralanması. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(21), 455–468.Google Scholar
- Parker, L. (2010). Climate change and the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS): Looking to 2020. CRS Report for Congress.Google Scholar
- Renda, A. (2014). The review of the Europe 2020 strategy: From austerity to prosperity? CEPS policy brief, 322, 27.Google Scholar
- Tucker, C. (2003). The Lisbon strategy and the open method of coordination: A new vision and the revolutionary potential of soft governance in the European Union. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 28–31 August.Google Scholar
- Urfalıoglu, F., & Genc, T. (2013). CKKV teknikleri ile Türkiye’nin ekonomik performansının Avrupa Birliği üye ülkeleri ile karşılaştırılması. Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B. Dergisi, 35(2), 329–360.Google Scholar
- Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56–66.Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum. (2012). The Europe 2020 competitiveness report: Building a more competitive Europe. Insight report, ISBN-10: 978-92-95044-43-2, Geneva. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/CSI/2012/Europe2020_Competitiveness_Report_2012.pdf.