Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 142, Issue 2, pp 667–688 | Cite as

How Far is Campania from the Best-Performing Region in Italy? A Territorial-Divide Analysis of Separate Waste Collection

  • Antonio Garofalo
  • Rosalia Castellano
  • Massimiliano Agovino
  • Gennaro Punzo
  • Gaetano MusellaEmail author
Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the divides in separate waste collection (SWC) between Campania and Veneto from a twofold perspective that considers both intensity (the size of the gap) and inequality (the differences among the SWC distributions across municipalities). In the framework of Kapp’s social cost theory, the Recentered Influence Function regression allows an evaluation of the amount of territorial divides that are accounted for by the: (i) regional component, which captures the extent to which regional authorities transpose national legislation into programs of waste management; (ii) municipal component, which explains the effect of the operational strategies adopted by each local authority to guarantee an adequate performance. As the best-performing region in Italy, Veneto reached an average SWC level far superior to that of Campania in 2012, and more importantly, most of its municipalities exceeded the 65% target set by Legislative Decree 152/2006 with a smaller variability within the region. However, a more detailed analysis shows that the policies and strategies for waste management set by the regional authority in Campania should be more effective at the initial stage, but are partly held back by the successive implementation steps controlled by each municipality. One of the primary deterrents of reaching a better performance in waste management in Campania lies in the weakness of its institutions, which makes the region more vulnerable with a large amount of heterogeneity in waste management performance across municipalities.

Keywords

Waste management Separate waste collection Government policy Regional Government analysis Inequality RIF regression 

JEL Classification

C21 Q5 Q53 Q58 R11 R5 

References

  1. Agovino, M., Crociata, A., & Sacco, P. L. (2016a). Location matters for pro-environmental behaviour: A spatial Markov Chains approach to proximity effects in differentiated waste collection. Annals of Regional Science, 56(1), 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agovino, M., Ferrara, M., & Garofalo, A. (2016b). An Exploratory Analysis on Waste Management in Italy: A Focus on Waste Disposal in Landfill. Land Use Policy, 57, 669–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agovino, M., Garofalo, A., & Mariani, A. (2016c). Effects of environmental regulation on separate waste collection dynamics: Empirical evidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124(1), 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agovino, M., Garofalo, A., & Mariani, A. (2017). Separate waste collection in Italy: the role of socio-cultural factors and targets set by law. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(2), 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armiero, M. (2014). Garbage under the Volcano: The waste crisis in Campania and the struggles for environmental justice. In M. Armiero & L. Sedrez (Eds.), A history of environmentalism. Local struggles, global histories. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Pl.Google Scholar
  6. Armiero, M., & D’Alisa, G. (2012). Rights of resistance: the garbage struggles for environmental justice in Campania, Italy. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23(4), 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armiero, M., & Fava, A. (2016). Of humanities, sheep, and dioxin: a history of contamination and transformation in Acerra, Italy. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 27(2), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bello, H., & Szymanski, S. (1996). Compulsory competitive tendering for public services in the UK: The case of refuse collection. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23(5–6), 881–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berglund, C., & Söderholm, P. (2003). An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization. Environmental & Resource Economics, 26(3), 429–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human resources, 8(4), 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruvoll, A., & Nyborg, K. (2004). The cold shiver of not giving enough: on the social cost of recycling campaigns. Land Economics, 80(4), 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bucciol, A., Montinari, N., & Piovesan, M. (2015). Do not trash the incentive! Monetary incentives and waste sorting. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1204–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bucciol, A., Montinari, N., Piovesan, M., & Valmasoni, L. (2011). Measuring the impact of economic incentives in waste sorting. In A. D’Amato, M. Mazzanti, & A. Montini (Eds.), Waste Management in Spatial Envirnoments. Abingdon: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  14. Caggiano, M., & De Rosa, S. P. (2015). Social economy as antidote to criminal economy. How social cooperation is reclaiming commons in the context of Campania’s environmental conflicts. Partecipazione e Conflitto, The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 8(2), 530–554.Google Scholar
  15. Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (1997). The impact of state and local policies on the recycling effort. Eastern Economic Journal, 23(4), 411–423.Google Scholar
  16. Cantoni, R. (2016). The waste crisis in Campania, south Italy: A historical perspective on an epidemiological controversy. Endeavour, 40(2), 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castellano, R., Musella, G., & Punzo, G. (2017). Structure of the labour market and wage inequality: Evidence from European countries. Quality & Quantity, 51(5), 2191–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Castellano, R., Musella, G., & Punzo, G. (2018). Exploring changes in the employment structure and wage inequality in Western Europe using the unconditional quantile regression. Empirica.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-017-9397-z.Google Scholar
  19. Chang, D. S., Liu, W., & Yeh, L. T. (2013). Incorporating the learning effect into data envelopment analysis to measure MSW recycling performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 496–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Comba, P., Bianchi, F., Fazzo, L., Martina, L., Menegozzo, M., Minichilli, F., et al. (2006). Cancer mortality in an area of Campania (Italy) characterized by multiple toxic dumping sites. Annals of the New York Academic of Sciences, 1076, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Corraliza, J. A., & Berenguer, J. (2000). Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: A situational approach. Environment and behavior, 32(6), 832–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crociata, A., Agovino, M., & Sacco, P. L. (2016). Neighborhood effects and pro-environmental behavior: The case of Italian separate waste collection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. D’Alisa, G., & Armiero, M. (2013). What happened to the trash? Political miracles and real statistics in an emergency regime. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 24(4), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. D’Alisa, G., Burgalassi, D., Healy, H., & Walter, M. (2010). Conflict in Campania: Waste emergency on crisis of democracy. Ecological Economics, 70, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. D’Alisa, G., Di Nola, M. F., & Giampietro, M. (2012). A multi-scale analysis of urban waste metabolism: Density of waste disposed in Campania. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. D’Alisa, G., & Kallis, G. (2016). A political ecology of maladaptation: insights from a Gramscian theory of the State. Global Environmental Change, 38, 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. D’Amato, A., Mazzanti, M., & Nicolli, F. (2015). Waste and organized crime in regional enviroments. How Waste tariffs and mafia affect waste management and disposal. Resource and Energy Economics, 41, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Biase, M. (2009). Lo Stato attacca. Pianura risponde. Scenari, strategie, tattiche ed azioni della rivolta anti-discarica nella periferia occidentale napoletana, In: Petrillo A. (edizione) Biopolitica di un rifiuto. Le rivolte antidiscarica a Napoli e in Campania, Ombre Corte editore, Verona.Google Scholar
  29. de Miranda Ribeiro, F., & Kruglianskas, I. (2015). Principles of environmental regulatory quality: A synthesis from literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Di Vita, G. (1997). Macroeconomic effects of the recycling of waste derived from imported nonrenewable raw materials. Resource Policy, 23(4), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Distaso, A. (2012). For an integrated and sustainable management of solid urban waste: an approach based on theory of social costs. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(3), 220–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Domberger, S., Meadowcroft, S. A., & Thompson, D. J. (1986). Competitive tendering and efficiency: The case of refuse collection. Fiscal studies, 7(4), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Expósito, A., & Velasco, F. (2018). Municipal solid-waste recycling market and the European 2020 Horizon Strategy: A regional efficiency analysis in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 938–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fazzo, L., Belli, S., Minichilli, F., Mitis, F., Santoro, M., Martina, L., et al. (2008). Cluster analysis of mortality and malformations in the provinces of Naples and Caserta (Campania regions). Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di sanità, 44(1), 99–111.Google Scholar
  35. Fiorillo, D. (2013). Household waste recycling: National Survey Evidence from Italy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(8), 1125–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Firpo, S., Fortin, N., Lemieux, T. (2007). Decomposing wage distributions using recentered influence function regressions. University of British Columbia (June).Google Scholar
  37. Firpo, S., Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3), 953–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fortin, N., Lemieux, T., & Firpo, S. (2011). Decomposition methods in economics. Handbook of labor economics, 4, 1–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garofalo, A., Castellano, R., Punzo, G., & Musella, G. (2017). Skills and labour incomes: How unequal is Italy as part of the Southern European countries? Quality & Quantity.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0531-6.Google Scholar
  40. Guerrini, A., Carvalho, P., Romano, G., & Cunha Marques, R. (2017). Assessing efficiency drivers in municipal solid waste collection services through a non-parametric method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147(20), 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hage, O., & Söderholm, P. (2008). An econometric analysis of regional differences in household waste collection: the case of plastic packaging waste in Sweden. Waste Management, 28(10), 1720–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hampel, F. R. (1974). The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heckley, G., Gerdtham, U. G., & Kjellsson, G. (2016). A general method for decomposing the causes of socioeconomic inequality in health. Journal of Health Economics, 48, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hornik, J., Cherian, J., Madansky, M., & Narayana, C. (1995). Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research results. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 24(1), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kapp, K. W. (1950). The social costs of private enterprise. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  46. Kapp, K. W. (1969). On the nature and significance of social costs. Kyklos, 2, 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kapp, K. W. (1970). Environmental disruption and social costs: A challenge to economics. Kyklos, 4, 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kapp, K. W. (1974). The implementation of environmental policies. Environmental Policies and Development Planning in Contemporary China and Other Essays. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
  49. Kapp, K. W. (1977). Environment and technology: New frontiers for the social and natural sciences. Journal of Economic Issues, 11(3), 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kinnaman, T. C. (2006). Policy watch examining the justification for residential recycling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kinnaman, T. C. (2010). Optimal solid waste tax policy centralized recycling. National Tax Journal, 63(2), 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Legambiente. (2012). Ecosistema Urbano. XIX Rapporto sulla qualità ambientale dei comuni capoluogo di provincia. http://www.legambiente.it/contenuti/dossier/ecosistema-urbano.
  54. Lucchini, F., & Membretti, A. (2016). The land of fires. Evaluating a state law to restore the narrative power of local communities. Partecipazione e conflitto, 9(2), 640–665.Google Scholar
  55. Martinez-Alier, J., Temper, L., Del Bene, D., & Scheidel, A. (2016). Is there a global environmental justice movement? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(3), 731–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Martuzzi, M., Mitis, F., Bianchi, F., Minichilli, F., Comba, P., & Fazzo, L. (2009). Cancer mortality and congenital anomalies in a region of Italy with intense environmental pressure due to waste. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 66, 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Nicolli, F. (2009). The dynamics of landfill diversion: Economic Drivers, policy factors and spatial issue: Evidence from Italy using provincial panel data. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Nicolli, F. (2012). Waste dynamics in economic and policy transitions: Decoupling, convergence and spatial effects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(5), 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A., & Zoboli, R. (2008). Municipal waste generation and socio economic drivers. Evidence from comparing Northern and Southern Italy. Journal of Environmental Development, 17, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2008). Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness: Evidence on decoupling from the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 1221–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2013). Resource taxation and regional planning: Revenue recycling for local sustainability in the aggregates sector. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(6), 893–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Membretti, A. (2016). Terra dei Fuochi: valutare l’impatto sulla salute della Legge 6/2014. Assunti di base, metodologia e procedure di una ricerca-azione territoriale. Cartografie Sociali, 1, Mimesis Edizioni.Google Scholar
  63. New York Times. (2007). In Mire of Politics and the Mafia, Garbage Reigns. May 31, 2007.Google Scholar
  64. Nifo, A., & Vecchione, G. (2014). Do institutions play a role in skilled migration? The Case of Italy, Regional Studies, 48(10), 1628–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rogge, N., & De Jaeger, S. (2012). Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in collecting and processing municipal solid waste: A shared input DEA-model. Waste Management, 32(10), 1968–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sarra, A., Mazzocchitti, M., & Rapposelli, A. (2017). Evaluating joint environmental and cost performance in municipal waste management systems through data envelopment analysis: Scale effects and policy implications. Ecological Indicators, 73, 756–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S., & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of environmental psychology, 15(2), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simões, P., Carvalho, P., & Marques, R. C. (2012). Performance assessment of refuse collection services using robust efficiency measures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 67, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and behavior, 27(6), 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. The Economist. (2009). Special report on waste, February 26th 2009.Google Scholar
  72. Triassi, M., Alfano, R., Illario, M., Nardone, A., Caporale, O., & Montuori, P. (2015). Environmental pollution from illegal waste disposal and health effects: a review on the “Triangle of Death”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 1216–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Van den Bergh, J. C. (2010). Externality or sustainability economics? Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2047–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and behavior, 22(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yeomans, J. S. (2007). Solid waste planning under uncertainty using evolutionary simulation–optimization. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 41, 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Garofalo
    • 1
  • Rosalia Castellano
    • 2
  • Massimiliano Agovino
    • 1
  • Gennaro Punzo
    • 1
  • Gaetano Musella
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Economic and Legal StudiesUniversity of Naples “Parthenope”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Management and Quantitative StudiesUniversity of Naples “Parthenope”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations