Using Weighted Goal Programming Model for Planning Regional Sustainable Development to Optimal Workforce Allocation: An Application for Provinces of Iran
- 137 Downloads
Due to the urbanization and economic growth, planning of regional sustainable development has become one of the major challenges in the world. The key indicators such as gross domestic product (GDP), electricity and energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission (GHG) are considered in sustainable development planning. This paper determines number of required workforce in different sectors of each province in Iran considering targets/goals for sustainable development indicators in the 2030 macroeconomic and regional planning. First, the relative goals are designed for GDP, electricity, energy and GHG emission and then, two weighted goal programming models are applied to allocate the optimal workforce among four sectors: agriculture, industry, services and transportation. The first model minimizes recruitment of new workforce and allows current workforce exchange among the four sectors in each province in order to achieve the goals, while the second model indicates equitable distribution of new workforce recruitment in different sectors within each province. In both models, the workforce changes have been investigated based on achieving the desirable growth rates of GDP, GHG, electricity and energy consumption as planned by the government. Based on the results of this paper, policy makers can manage workforce and the government can make optimized decisions to macroeconomic and regional planning.
KeywordsSustainable development Weighted goal programming Regional planning Optimal workforce allocation
The authors would like to thank Professor Filomena Maggino, the editor of Social Indicators Research Journal, and five reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. As results this paper has been improved substantially.
- Bečić, E., Mulej, E. M., & Švarc, J. (2012). Measuring social progress by sustainable development indicators: Cases of Croatia and Slovenia. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37, 458–465.Google Scholar
- Ciegis, R., Ramanauskiene, J., & Startiene, G. (2015). Theoretical reasoning of the use of indicators and indices for sustainable development assessment. Engineering Economics, 63(4), 33–40.Google Scholar
- Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2001). A sustainable Europe for a better world: The European Union strategy for sustainable development. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
- Greaker, M., Stoknes, P. E., Alfsen, K. H., & Ericson, T. (2013). A Kantian approach to sustainable development indicators for climate change. Ecological Indicators, 91, 10–18.Google Scholar
- Jones, D., & Tamiz, M. (2010). Case study: Application of goal programming in portfolio selection. In Practical goal programming. International series in operations research and management science (Vol. 141, pp. 151–160). Springer US.Google Scholar
- Kılkış, Ş. (2015). Sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems index for Southeast European cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 130, 222–234.Google Scholar
- Lee, S. M. (1972). Goal programming for decision analysis of multiple objectives. Sloan Management Review, 14, 11–24.Google Scholar
- Munda, G. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. In Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (pp. 953–986). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2001). The well being of nations: The role of human and social capital. OECD Publication. http://www.oecd.org. Accessed on 2016.
- Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2011). Economic Development. Addison-Wesley, Edition 11Google Scholar
- World Summit for Social development Copenhagen. (1995). http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/wssd/index.html. Accessed on 2016.