Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 142, Issue 2, pp 689–712 | Cite as

Evaluation and Management of Urban Liveability: A Goal Programming Based Composite Indicator

  • Beatriz Valcárcel-AguiarEmail author
  • Pilar Murias
Article

Abstract

This paper proposes a composite indicator intended to assess the degree of liveability provided by urban areas. This synthetic index makes two essential contributions to previous research. Firstly, it starts from a series of specifically urban partial indicators and dimensions. Secondly, the technique used to estimate the goal-programming-based index (Blancas et al. in Ecol Econ 69:2158–2172, 2010) enables urban managers to actively participate in constructing the indicator. The instrument was tested by estimating the index for a number of Spanish cities. The results reveal significant differences in the degree of liveability based on geographical location, population and functional hierarchy. Its application to Spain further highlights the tool’s potential for liveability analysis by varying urban manager profiles.

Keywords

Urban liveability Urban management Composite indicator Goal programming Spanish cities 

References

  1. Abel, J. R., Gabe, T. M., & Stolarick, K. (2014). Skills across the urban-rural hierarchy. Growth and Change, 45(4), 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammons, D. N. (2012). Municipal benchmarks: Assessing local performance and establishing community standards. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  3. Arbab, P. (2017). City prosperity inititative index: Using AHP method to recalculate the weights of dimensions and sub-dimensions in reference to Tehran Metropolis. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(4), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archibugi, F. (2001). City effect and urban overload as a program indicators of the regional policy. Social Indicators Research, 54, 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellet, C., & Llop, J. M. (2004). Miradas a otros espacios urbanos: las ciudades intermedias. Scripta Nova. Revista electronica de geografía y ciencias sociales, 165(8), 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Blair, J. P., & Premus, R. (1987). Major factors in industrial location: A review. Economic Development Quarterly, 1(1), 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blancas, F. J., Caballero, R., González, M., Lozano-Oyola, M., & Pérez, F. (2010). Goal programming synthetic indicators: An application for sustainable tourism in Andalusian coastal counties. Ecological Economics, 69, 2158–2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonatti, G., Ivaldi, E., & Soliani, R. (2017). Quality of life in Italian cities: A temporal comparison between before the crisis and after. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(4), 560–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyer, R., & Savageau, D. (1981). Places Rated Almanac. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  10. Braulio-Gonzálo, M., Bovea, M. D., & Ruá, M. J. (2015). Sustainability on the urban scale: Proposal of a structure of indicators for the Spanish context. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 53, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Button, K. (2002). City management and urban environmental indicators. Ecological Economics, 40, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1961). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Cheema, S. G. (1993). The challenge of urban management: some issues. In S. G. Cheema & E. Wards (Eds.), Urban management policies and innovations in developing countries (1-17). London: Praeger Westport.Google Scholar
  15. Cicerchia, A. (1999). Measures of optimal centrality: Indicators of city effect and urban overloading. Social Indicators Research, 46, 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cullen, J. B., & Levitt, S. D. (1999). Crime, urban flight, and the consequences for cities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(2), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88, 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devuyst, D. (2001). Introduction to sustainability assessment at the local level. In D. Devuyst, L. Hens, & W. De Lannoy (Eds.), How green is the City? Sustainability assessment and the management of urban environments. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Díaz-Balteiro, L., & Romero, C. (2004). Sustainability of forest management plans: A discrete goal programming approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 71, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, National Bureau of economic research working papers, 9931.Google Scholar
  21. ESPON. (2003). The role, specific situation and potentials of urban areas as nodes in a polycentric development. Third interim report. Luxembourg: ESPON.Google Scholar
  22. ESPON. (2014). Town. Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context. ESPON: Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2007). State of European cities report. Adding value to the European Urban Audit. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission. (2011). Cities of tomorrow. Challenges. visions. ways forward. Brussels: Directorate General for Regional Policy.Google Scholar
  25. European Environment Agency. (2011). Air quality e-Reporting. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/aqereporting-8.
  26. Eurostat. (2011). Urban audit. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
  27. Findlay, A., Morris, A., & Rogerson, R. (1988). Where to live in Britain in 1988? Cities, 5, 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (1996). Economics of agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10, 339–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., & Meijers, E. (2007). City-ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Centre for Regional Science.Google Scholar
  31. Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glaeser, E. L., & Mare, D. C. (2001). Cities and skills. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2), 316–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glaeser, E. L., Ressenger, M., & Tobio, K. (2008). Urban inequality. (NBER working paper series, 14419, National Bureau of Economic Research).Google Scholar
  34. Glaeser, E. L., & Sacerdote, B. (1999). Why is there more crime in cities? Journal of Political Economy, 107(S6), S225–S258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Godschalk, D. R. (2004). Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. González, E., Cárcaba, A., & Ventura, J. (2011). The importance of the geographic level of analysis in the assessment of the quality of life: The case of Spain. Social Indicators Research, 102(2), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. González, E., Cárcaba, A., & Ventura, J. (2016). Weight constrained DEA measurement of the quality of life in Spanish municipalities in 2011. Social Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1426-y.Google Scholar
  38. Gottlieb, P. (1994). Amenities as economic development tools: Is there enough evidence? Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 1413–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gough, M. Z. (2015). Reconciling livability and sustainability: Conceptual and practical implications for planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Higgins, P., & Campanera, J. M. (2011). (Sustainable) quality of life in English city locations. Cities, 28, 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huggins, R. (2009). Regional competitive intelligence: Benchmarking and policy making. Regional Studies, 44(5), 539–658.Google Scholar
  42. Hughes, P., Bellamy, J., & Black, A. (1999). Social trust: Locally and across Australia. Third Sector Review, 5, 5–24.Google Scholar
  43. Ignizio, J. P. (1976). Goal programming and extensions. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  44. Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G. (2015). Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krugman, P. (1996). Urban concentration: The role of increasing returns and transport costs. International Regional Science Review, 19(1–2), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lambiri, D., Biagi, B., & Royuela, V. (2007). Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Social Indicators Research, 84, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee, S. M. (1972). Goal programming for decision analysis. Philladelphia: Auerbach.Google Scholar
  48. Liu, B.-C. (1976). Quality of life indicators in U.S. metropolitan areas. A statistical analysis. Praeger Publishers: New York.Google Scholar
  49. Lloyd, K., Fullagar, S., & Reid, S. (2016). Where is the “social” in constructions of liveability? Exploring community, social interactions and social cohesion in changing urban environments. Urban Policy and Research, 34(4), 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luque-Martínez, T., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2005). City benchmarking: A methodological proposal referring specifically to Granada. Cities, 22(6), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marans, R. W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marans, R. W. (2015). Quality of urban life & environmental sustainable studies: Future linkage opportunities. Habitat International, 45, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Martín, J. C., & Mendoza, C. (2013). A DEA approach to measure the quality of life in the municipalities of the Canary Islands. Social Indicators Research, 113, 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Medcalfe, S. (2017). Economic well-being in U.S. metropolitan statistical areas. Social Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1755-5.Google Scholar
  55. Meijering, J. V., Kern, K., & Tobi, H. (2014). Identifying the methodological characteristics of European green city rankings. Ecological Indicators, 43, 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport. (2011). Bibliotecas Públicas Españolas en Cifras. Available online: http://www.mecd.gob.es/cultura/areas/bibliotecas/mc/ebp/portada.html.
  57. Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality. (2011). Catálogo Nacional de Hospitales. Available online: https://www.msssi.gob.es/estadisticas/microdatos.do.
  58. Ministry of Public Works and Transport. (2009). Sistema de Información Urbana. Available online: http://visorsiu.fomento.es/geonetwork/srv/es/main.home.
  59. Morais, P., & Camanho, A. S. (2011). Evaluation of performance of European cities with the aim to promote quality of life improvements. Omega, 39, 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morais, P., Miguéis, V. L., & Camanho, A. S. (2013). Quality of life experienced by human capital: An assessment of European cities. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mori, K., Fujii, T., Yamashita, T., Mimura, Y., Uchiyama, Y., & Hayashi, K. (2015). Visualization of a City Sustainability Index (CSI): Towards transdisciplinary approaches involving multiple stakeholders. Sustainability, 7, 402–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  63. Navarro, J. M., & Artal, A. (2015). Foot voting in Spain: What do internal migrations say about quality of life in the Spanish municipalities. Social Indicators Research, 124, 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Newton, P. W. (2012). Liveable and sustainable? Socio-technical challenges for twenty-first-century cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 19(1), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nissi, E., & Sarra, A. (2016). A measure of well-being across the Italian urban areas: An integrated DEA-entropy approach. Social Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1535-7.Google Scholar
  66. Peach, N. D., & Petach, L. A. (2016). Development and quality of life in cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 30(1), 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reig, E. (2016). Ciudades y calidad de vida en el área metropolitana de Valencia. Revista de Estudios Regionales, 106, 79–104.Google Scholar
  68. Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. The Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), 1257–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rogerson, R. J. (1995). Environmental and health-related quality of life: Conceptual and methodological similarities. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1373–1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rogerson, R. J. (1999). Quality of life and city competitiveness. Urban Studies, 36(5–6), 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Royuela, V., Suriñach, J., & Reyes, M. (2003). Measuring quality of life in small areas over different periods of time. Social Indicators Research, 64(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saitluanga, B. L. (2014). Spacial pattern of urban livability in Himalayan region: A case of Aizawl City, India. Social Indicators Research, 117, 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Santos, L. D., & Martins, I. (2007). Monitoring urban quality of life: The Porto experience. Social Indicators Research, 80, 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shafer, C. S., Lee, B. K., & Turner, S. (2000). A tale of three greenway trails: User perceptions related to quality of life. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(3), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sharma, S. K. (1989). Municipal management. Urban Affairs Quarterly-India, 21, 47–53.Google Scholar
  77. Spanish Statistical Institute. (2011a). Urban indicators. Available online: http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/en/categoria.htm?c=Estadistica_P&cid=1254735976606.
  78. Spanish Statistical Institute. (2011b). Population figures and demographic censuses. Available online: http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/en/categoria.htm?c=Estadistica_P&cid=1254734710984.
  79. Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J.-F., & Lanoie, P. (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Turcu, C. (2013). Re-thinking sustainability indicators: Local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), 695–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Türksever, A. N. E., & Atalik, G. (2001). Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas. Social Indicators Research, 53, 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F., & Güvenç, Ü. (2001). A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. UN-Habitat. (2008). State of the world´s cities 2008-2009: harmonious cities. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  84. Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Werna, E. (1995). The management of urban development, or the development of urban management? Problems and premises of an elusive concept. Cities, 12(5), 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wheeler, S. M. (2000). Planning for metropolitan sustainability. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wheeler, C. (2005). Cities, skills and inequality. Growth and Change, 36(3), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wheeler, S. M. (2013). Planning for sustainability. Creating livable, equitable and ecological communities. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zanella, A., Camanho, A. S., & Dias, T. G. (2015). The assessment of cities´ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact. Annals of Operations Research, 226, 695–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ziersch, A. M., Baum, F., Darmawan, I. G. N., Kavanagh, A. M., & Bentley, R. J. (2009). Social capital and health in rural and urban communities in South Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Quantitative Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaSantiagoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaSantiagoSpain

Personalised recommendations