Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 141, Issue 1, pp 191–215 | Cite as

The Global Challenge of Jihadist Terrorism: A Quality-of-Life Model

  • M. Joseph SirgyEmail author
  • Mohsen Joshanloo
  • Richard J. Estes
Article
  • 293 Downloads

Abstract

What makes some Muslims in identifiable regions of the world accept Jihadism and, more particularly, Jihadist terrorism as a solution to domestic social, economic, and political problems? We attempt to answer this question using a sample of 32,604 Muslims from 26 countries surveyed in 2011–2012 by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. We hypothesized that many Muslims believe that Jihadist terrorism is an acceptable solution to national, regional, and global social problems such as political corruption, recurrent crime, inter-generational poverty, diversity-related social conflict, widespread joblessness and under-employment that pervade many Islamic nations. This belief is determined by attributing blame for recurrent national problems to Western powers and to their overly powerful cultural and political influence in Islamic societies but, especially those that until recently, were colonies of major European powers. National problems blamed on Western influence, in turn, result in a high sense of national ill-being, which in turn is influenced by low levels of subjective well-being (or subjective ill-being). We also hypothesized that certain effects associated with political militancy, including the willingness to engage in acts of terrorism, are moderated by a sense of economic ill-being and by a fervent sense of Muslim religiosity among the strongest believers in each society. The study results reported in this paper are mostly supportive of these hypotheses. The public policy implications of the findings reported herein are discussed throughout the paper as well.

Keywords

Islamic militancy Jihadism Jihadist terrorism Terrorism Radical Islam Quality of life Subjective well-being National ill-being Perceived Western influence 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors of this paper received financial support from any source in conducting or preparing this manuscript for publication. Further, the authors do not expect to benefit financially in any way from the paper’s publication.

References

  1. Albrecht, S. L., & Heaton, T. B. (1984). Secularization, higher education, and religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 26(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azen, R., & Walker, C. M. (2011). Categorical data analysis for the behavioral and social sciences. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, J. (2012). The world’s Muslims: Unity and diversity: The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved at http://www.pewforum.org/2012/08/09/the-worlds-muslims-unity-and-diversity-executive-summary/.
  4. Berrebi, C. (2007). Evidence about the link between education, poverty and terrorism among Palestinians. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 13(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaydes, L., & Linzer, D. A. (2012). Elite competition, religiosity, and anti-Americanism in the Islamic World. The American Political Science Review, 106(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating bottom-up and top-down theories of subjective well-being: The case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 646–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bryan, M. L., & Jenkins, S. P. (2015). Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantril, H. (1965). Pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cheung, F., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23(10), 2809–2818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuoto, R. A. (2010). The politics of terrorism: Power, legitimacy, and violence. Integral Review, 6(1), 1–20. Retrieved August 28, 2017 from http://integral-review.org/documents/Couto,%20Politics%20of%20Terrorism,%20Vol.%206%20No.%201.pdf.
  13. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., & Tov, W. (2012). National accounts of well-being. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 137–157). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esposito, J., & Mogahed, D. (2007). Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think?. Washington, DC: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
  18. Estes, R. J., & Sirgy, M. J. (2014). Radical Islamic militancy and acts of terrorism: A quality-of-life analysis. Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 615–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Estes, R. J., & Sirgy, M. J. (2016). Is quality of life related to radical Islamic militancy and acts of terrorism? In R. J. Estes & H. Tiliouine (Eds.), Social progress in Islamic societies: Social, political, economic, and ideological challenges (pp. 575–605). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Estes, R. J., & Tiliouine, H. (2014). Development challenges confronting Islamic societies: From collective wishes to concerted actions. Social Indicators Research, 116(1), 67–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Estes, R. J., & Tiliouine, H. (2016). The state of social progress of Islamic societies: Social, political, economic, and ideological challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). (2013). Terrorism defined. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism. Accessed 31 Dec 2017.
  23. Finifter, A. W. (1970). Dimensions of political alienation. American Political Science Review, 64(2), 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freedman, B. (2010). Perspectives on terrorism: Terrorism research centres. University of Leiden (Netherlands), Terrorism Research Initiative (TRI), Vol. 4(5). Retrieved May 15, 2017 from http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/123/html.
  25. Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  26. Graham, J. W., & Coffman, D. L. (2012). Structural equation modeling with missing data. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. Haas, M. L., & Lesch, D. W. (2016). The Arab spring: The hope and reality of the uprisings (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., & Wearing, A. (1991). Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 24(1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. House, Freedom. (2017). Freedom throughout the world, 2017. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
  30. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Institute for Economics and Peace. (2016). Global terrorism index, 2016. Retrieved August 1, 2017 from http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2017/02/Global-Terrorism-Index-2016.pdf.
  32. Investopedia. (2017). Gross national income (GNI). Retrieved September 10, 2017 from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gross-national-income-gni.asp#ixzz4sJSaED8v.
  33. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keyes, C. L. M., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 411–425). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krueger, A. B., & Malečková, J. (2003). Education, poverty and terrorism: Is there a causal connection? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larsen, R. (2011). Missing data imputation versus full information maximum likelihood with second-level dependencies. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lau, A. L., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 72(3), 403–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  39. Nelson, B., & Roylance, T. (2015). Terrorism is rare in democracies. Freedom House News (January 9). Retrieved August 27, 2017 from https://freedomhouse.org/blog/terrorism-remains-rare-democracies.
  40. Nezlek, J. B. (2011). Multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pew Research Center. (2013). The world’s Muslims: Religion, politics and society. Washington: Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. Retrieved August 26, 2017 from “The Pew Forum’s Global Survey of Islam”.Google Scholar
  42. Puddington, A. (2015). Democracy is the best defense against terrorism. Freedom House News (January 13). Retrieved August 27, 2017 from https://freedomhouse.org/blog/democracy-best-defense-against-terrorism.
  43. Quiggin, T. (2010). Terrorism as politics by other means. Global Brief (October 12). Retrieved August 27, from http://globalbrief.ca/blog/2010/10/13/terrorism-as-politics-by-other-means/.
  44. Rubin, B. (Ed.). (1990). Terror as a state and revolutionary strategy; the politics of counterterrorism; terrorism and the media: Dilemmas for government, journalists and the public. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Shafiq, M. N. (2010). Do education and income affect support for democracy in Muslim countries? Evidence from the Pew Global Attitudes Project. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sirgy, M. J., Estes, R. J., & Rahtz, D. (2017). Combatting Jihadist terrorism: A quality-of-life perspective. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 29(3), 461–469.Google Scholar
  47. Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R. A., & Davern, M. (2006). Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: The case of Algeria. Social Indicators Research, 75(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2003). The Arab Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  49. United States Department of State. (2017). Country reports on terrorism, 20002016. Washington: USDOS. Retrieved August 3, 2017 from https://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/.
  50. University of Maryland. (2017). Center for the study of terrorism and response to terrorism (START). College Park, MD: University of Maryland START Program. Retrieved August 3, 2017 from http://www.start.umd.edu/.
  51. Wade, N. (2009). The faith instinct: How religion evolved and why it endures. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  52. Winkelmann, R. (2009). Unemployment, social capital, and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Media and political conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Joseph Sirgy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohsen Joshanloo
    • 2
  • Richard J. Estes
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Marketing, Pamplin College of BusinessVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech)BlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyKeimyung UniversityDaeguSouth Korea
  3. 3.School of Social Policy and Practice (SP2)University of PennsylvaniaNarberthUSA

Personalised recommendations